To unconfuse: When these ridiculous articles on Duffy showed up on the front page, it was viewed by the Admin of this site as a cheap shot at the unions and by association a cheap shot at Jack Loscombe. It's meant to influence the election.
The Admin of this site posted the exposure of Family Court's negligence and crony antics in retaliation for the Duffy articles. Wherever this issue goes with Family Court and Danielle Ross can therefore be the blame of the Times-Tribune.
He is so retarded, HD, that he honestly believes that it's not wrong that one person or family controls the media in this area, it's just wrong that it isn't HIM.
This is what he's doing here. Playing a completely stupid game of tit for unrelated tat, and he's proving himself to be an even bigger farce than anyone previously imagined.
Get over yourself, loser! You are a punchline. Nothing more, nothing less. The butt of many jokes, some about your website, most about your intellect.
Sue me, bitch.
-- Edited by Paul on Monday 25th of April 2011 03:59:10 PM
Crazy thing is, it's hard to even make the connection to what Pilchesky is doing and what the Times is reporting. More than a few DD posters are confused as to the relationship between his tit-for-tat threads.
What, Joe Pilchesky engaged in non-sensical rants? Why say it isn't so! Next thing you know someone here will be acusing him of inserting not-so-subtle homo-erotic references into this postings. Wait, I think I just did.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.