Banned for asking for clarification - PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech

Paul

Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline

Posts: 1694

Date: Thu Apr 21 11:16 AM, 2011

Banned for asking for clarification

Permalink

Fuh Queue Joe.

Sister Catherine

Posts: 191
Date: Apr 20 10:59 PM, 2011

	Printer Friendly
No signs of tiring, either. Must be the diet he's on - Doherty testicles. Lots of protien. Could be that's why the mayor looks so drained all the time.

You want people thinking that "Sister Catherine" believes that Loscombe sucks dick, go right ahead. I know you're partial to that anyway...

__________________

Paul

Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline

Posts: 1694

Date: Thu Apr 21 11:23 AM, 2011

RE: Banned for asking for clarification	Permalink

Or maybe it was for this one, that Joe was too stupid to pick up on, referencing his wife's estate fraud: http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?aBID=65524 GimmeACuppaJoe Date: Mar 2 5:46 PM, 2011 Anyone who steals from an old man should be made to spend lots of time in jail. Period. __________________

Paul

Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline

Posts: 1694

Date: Thu Apr 21 11:27 AM, 2011

RE: Banned for asking for clarification

Permalink

Or posts in this thread, maybe, that Joe was too stupid to pick up on, referencing Janet's failure to be an open and transparent champion of people other than Pilchelskyesque Bottomfeeder Types: http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?aBID=65524&p=3&topicID=42290102&page=1#lastPostAnchor

GimmeACuppaJoe
Posts: 65
Date: Apr 13 4:22 PM, 2011

	Printer Friendly
Surely our esteemed Mrs. Evans will hold the paper legally responsible for any libelous statements or character misrepresentations put forth, right? Unless it's all true.....devils advocately speaking, of course.

GimmeACuppaJoe
Posts: 65
Date: Apr 13 4:48 PM, 2011

Printer Friendly

fiona wrote:
Janet will explain everything at the proper time (4/21/11 still waiting, BTW...). Until she decides to do so, we should take her at her word, and respect her right to privacy.

Are we prepared to extend that exact same courtesy to EVERY OTHER POLITICIAN in the area, or just a select few. Personally, I like my standards to be of the single variety, not double.

__________________

Paul

Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline

Posts: 1694

Date: Thu Apr 21 11:31 AM, 2011

RE: Banned for asking for clarification

Permalink

Or more from the same thread:

GimmeACuppaJoe
Posts: 65
Date: Apr 14 10:46 AM, 2011

	Printer Friendly
So you're saying that Evans has no one to blame but herself for this controversy? Almost as if she set herself up for it by campaigning on openness and transparency. Almost like "Muphry's Law". Interesting take on it.

GimmeACuppaJoe
Posts: 65
Date: Apr 14 2:14 PM, 2011

Printer Friendly

Seems that the basic question is, "is she on the payroll as teacher or not" and it's being danced around. Seems to be a pretty straightforard question, and not worth all the nonsense. Just say yes or no and it can (and should, frankly) die. Doesnt' seem that anyone really cares about her medical records, as she herself has stated she's involved in a workmans comp claim. The issue comes down to her employment with the SSD. Is she or isn't she? Simple question, simple answer.

fiona
Posts: 133
Date: Apr 14 2:36 PM, 2011

	Printer Friendly
Janet has a right to privacy on her medical condition. Didn't she need to make known on her campaign finance report the status of her employment ? Wouldn't that be enough to satisfy all the questions ? We should be focusing on different issues, and not the comp case involving a teacher. __________________ fiona

GimmeACuppaJoe
Posts: 65
Date: Apr 14 3:17 PM, 2011

Printer Friendly

The only ones who seem to be making an issue over her comp case or medical condition are her supporters. Not even her detractors are focusing on them, Fiona, because those two issues are irrelevant to the question posed.

As far as campaign finance reports, is she running for anything that would necessitate her filing one? No. Two years ago when she was, it wasn't an issue.

Enough spin and deflection. Just answer the question asked.

Not my fault that Pilchesky and Evans supporters are too fking dense for their own good.

Do Scranton a favor and don't vote, losers. No one needs your ignorant input in city business anymore. Go crawl back under your rocks.

__________________