Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: If true....


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
If true....
Permalink  
 


and that is a big IF coming from that bu$$hitter across the hall, maybe Pat can share the ride with Edith to their respective holding cell while awaiting transportation to their final destination cells......Right Glenn?


Joe Pilchesky

240809?AWSAccessKeyId=1XXJBWHKN0QBQS6TGPG2&Expires=1297296000&Signature=aBT8VD006%2Fp1JJ9bE%2BtjE0GOvYQ%3D&1273534997

Posts: 8719
Date: Jan 29 11:44 AM, 2011
School Director, Patrick O'Malley, buries dead brother, excludes his children, opens estate under false docket number
 Printer Friendly


On January 6, 2007 Paul T. O'Malley, Scranton, passed away.  He was a military veteran, having served his country honorably.  At the time of his death, he was divorced, but he had two children, one was 17 years old and the other was 23.

About a week after Paul T. O'Malley passed, his children received notification from the Veterans' Administration regarding the effect of his death upon benefits he had been receiving. That's how both children found out that their father was dead. You can imagine the shock of getting a letter like that, but it became even more shocking for the children of Paul T. O'Malley.

When they immediately contacted other family members, they learned that their father's funeral was already conducted and they both had been excluded. There was no obit in the paper. Their Uncle Pat, that being Patrick M. O'Malley, Scranton School Director, took possession of the body and disposed of the remains without consulting with, or notifying, the two natural children of Paul T. O'Malley, which happens to be as illegal as the day is long. See 20 Pa. C.S.A., section 305 (c), which provides that if there is no spouse, the legal right to dispose of the remains of the deceased lies in the children.  The funeral director was Carl Sovino.

After a confrontation over what Patrick M. O'Malley did, Pat then put an obit in the paper 11 days after Paul T. O'Malley died.

Fastforward to January 6, 2011.  Patrick M. O'Malley, by and through John J. Brazil, Esq.,  then filed a Petition to take over control of the estate of Paul T. O'Malley. No Will. It was served upon the children of Paul T. O'Malley on January 20th. It's Docket No. 0551-2008, as evidenced by the paperwork. 

The daughter of Paul T. O'Malley, Amber O'Malley, responded by filing a Petition of her own, demanding that as the natural daughter, she should be awarded control of the estate. The law provides that she and her brother gets the estate anyway.

When you click on Amber O'Malley's Petition, notice that the docket number used in Patrick O'Malley's Petition, 0551-2008, has been crossed out and replaced with a new number.  That's because when the clerk at the Register of Wills went to the file to confirm that Docket No. of 0551-2008 was that of the estate of the deceased, Paul. T. O'Malley, she discovered that 0551-2008 was a Docket No. for another person, whose estate matters concluded in May of 2010. 

How did a skilled attorney like John J. Brazil walk into the Register of Wills of Lackawanna County on behalf of Patrick M. O'Malley with a prepared Petition to open an estate using the docket number of someone else he had represented back in 2008.  Yes, he was the lawyer for that deceased person.  Using an existing docket number of someone else saved only a $55.00 fee.

These two trains will collide on February 14, 2011 at 1:30 where Patrick M. O'Malley can explain to Judge Harhut why he used someone else's docket number to open an estate, why he buried the father of the children of Paul T. O'Malley without notice to his natural children, why he failed to follow several other estate laws, and how he thinks he can run for county commissioner with this kind of gross illegal and unethical conduct exposed


__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: If true....
Permalink  
 


Well he is an expert at estate fraud...

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: If true....
Permalink  
 


Oh now don't we think this story would have surfaced before now ... why didn't joe pull this one out when Patrick was running for the School Board

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: If true....
Permalink  
 


It is a big "if", and I think that one should wait for all of the facts to be placed on the table before passing judg(e)ment.  Estates are strange creatures.  When there's no will, there are tons of tiny problems that could pop up and quickly become big ones if they are not remedied immediately.

The information was very detailed, though.  If all this does surface in court, I would be shocked if Pat ran for another term as school director, much less county office.

Big credibility-wagering accusation.

GC


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: If true....
Permalink  
 


......but Glenn my question was if it were true could he and Edith share the same bus on the way to the big house?  :)

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: If true....
Permalink  
 


How does Joe know that there was no will? How does he know that it wasn't a typo on the part of a clerk in the office? How do any of us know that Pat O'Malley was not the executor of the estate. I am assuming that Paul was estranged from his children ... not that this excuses the fact that they were not informed of their fathers death .... but it seems pretty obvious to me that they didn't give a rats ass about thier father until he was dead and they could have a personal gain from his death ... sounds kind of like what Joanne Pilchesky did with her dad ... hmmmmmm .... I knew what kind of day my father had every day of his life because I made a point to speak to both my mother and father every day .... I just don't understand how someone could care so little for their parents that they do not know when they are sick and don't know when they have passed away. Judgemental on my part ... you bet ... am I sorry for being judgemental ... NOPE ... not one bit!

Now hopefully Pat O'Malley was on the up and up with his actions ... and if not then he should be on the bus with Edith! And the real question is .... when is Edith getting on the bus to prison for ripping off an estate?

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: If true....
Permalink  
 


The every famous DD double standard .... Edith even though she is found guilty of a very similar crime ... well we need to give her the benefit of the doubt ... but she has been convicted ... Now we have Pat O'Malley who has not been convicted ... but we should hang him on the Ethics of Joe and his Merry Band of Losers.

big dog
Posts: 355
Date: Jan 29 6:14 PM, 2011
 Printer Friendly

I said it before in this site that Pat Omalley has the brains of a Rock. He should go to jail if this is true. It is a violation of the law, it is theft and deception, then this lawyer actuall files false documentation as it appears. This guy Omalley always has his picture plastered all over the paper telling people what a nice guy he is. He also works at the prision overseeing prisoners that probably have done the same Thing. If this is factual which apparently it appears it is both he and Brazil should serve Federal Prison time of at least 10 years. Typical Politician. Now he Omalley is to appear before a judge and explain his actions. What a shame.



It seems to me after reading the petitions on DD ... the only money Pat O'Malley is looking for is to recover the $4,000 balance that is owed to the funeral home ... it's not like he's taking $100,000 or more  for his own personal use like Edith did ... he wants to settle the balance owed to the Funeral Director.

So here is the question if this guy died in 2007 why are they all just now in 2011 moving ahead with this?   That was 4 years ago ... how old is this girl now?  Was she an adult child at the time of Paul O'Malley's death?


__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: If true....
Permalink  
 


At the time her father died she was only 17 years old and not of legal age. She was born in July of 1989 and her father died in January of 2007 ... so she was not legally an adult capabe of making decisions at the time of his death.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard