Doesn't Joe speaking through one of his gazillion alias and pretending he is someone else so he can take you to task on behalf of himself sort of creep you out a bit?
Is this the same Glenn who lives in Olyphant and has done zero for the people of the City of Scranton?
There's no question about it. Whenever there are Doherty cronies illegally sitting on an authority nothing should be done about it. I don't think Joe Pilchesky should be helping those Latinos save their church either. The nerve of him. As for Kenny McD just let him get away with anything he wants. Joe should have never exposed him, such a waste of time. Joe shouldn't have stopped the county from changing the voting district last year either. Tell the people of Covington Township that Joe Pilchesky is trivial and see what happens.
Let's list all the things Glenn Cashuric has done. Go ahread Glenn, you start it off.
Unbelieveable. You know what's most incredible? That Joe Pilchesky is still here. Still fighting. Still pushing for the right thing.
This is what happens when those who should never...ever...win actually do. As the supermajority flounders and publicly protests that it is being persecuted as a "do nothing" council (which isn't completely true--they are simply a "not doing nearly enough" council) and the council speakers vanish like political zombies deprived of a ready victim to devour, the true colors of the protest movement begin to show.
Chris Phillips? Hero to zero. Ken Smith? Hey, what's a hundred grand in unpaid taxes and fees when his opponent is someone who dares to speak out against Janet? The problem here is that the person who normally would be the most deserving target of that group's scorn is...gasp...Janet herself. All the other potential villains have been defeated.
Now that's a conundrum. The budget will be entertaining, because the Fab Four have really painted themselves into a corner. If they give the unions a free pass, they fail. If they start spreading the pain, DD will implode.
I can'tdisagree with your predictions. I however am not surprised as I have seen her performances during her whole political career (starting back in the "wow I can give myself a job School Director's day). About the only thing she is good at is BSing people.....all talk no action ......all image no substance.
Just for fun Glenn ......between you and me how many fake screen names do you think Baldy actually has?..we estimate over 100
Hey Baldy!!! I dare ya!! LOL you chicken**** all talk no action.......jerk-off. Ya we know this is just another of your aliases. You are about as likely to showup and talk as you are to grow some hair this week. Unless of course you have Fay to do your talking for you.... what a pansy!!! hehahahheheha
Posts: 141 Date: Oct 30 8:50 AM, 2010
Printer Friendly
Decreased funding from $5,000 to $1,000 for St. Joseph's Center mother-infant program.
What is it that this program doesn't do that offends this supermajority to the extent of cutting funding for it? It isn't much funding to begin with for God's sake or maybe it should have been increased. What's up with that? I suppose I'll have to make a council appearance to find out.
This is literally one post after another, after another....... Glenn this kind of thing really doesn't freak you out?.... that he speaks with so many "voices"........it freaks me out. Can anyone say S-Y-B-I-L?
If that doesn't become a book nothing should. There was a book published call "Ball Four" about a park that was saved in Boston I believe. Similar situation, but this story is way more involved. This story has it all.
It's really great of Fran Vutnoski to put her name on that. It means a lot to all of us who want that park back. Thanks Fran.
No matter what happens there Joe P. you're giving it a hell of a ride. No one can say anything different. It'll be a fantastic deed if you pull this off, but as you've shown us the court is dirty to the core and I'll be pretty shocked if it rules against the U of S and the city. Keep up the good work. We'll keep the prayers going.
Universities are not only huge contributors to very high level public officials, but they offer perks galore to friends and families of powerful elected officials and you don't get much more powerful than a Commonwealth Court judge. Trust me, the Jesuits are well connected right up to the Supreme Court as Mr. Pilchesky will discover.
If a university gives a staff or maintenance job to the spouse of anyone who works for the judiciary and that person has children, then they all get a free education. That can be a $500,000.00 perk right there. The beat goes on. The universities have loads of people working for them with relatives in government. All under the radar, of course.
Holy litigation, Batman. Just when you thought you heard it all. Let me get this right. Fran Vutnoski is filing a motion to dismiss a case that she filed years ago that is already over. If that's not like trying to get the wine back into the shape of a grape I don't know what is. Good luck with that one. Who thinks of this stuff?
It's not complex at all if you take the time to read it. It's actually very interesting. And makes total sense I might add.
You need a legal analyst to understand it. Joe should do those things in English so we can all understand what he's doing. I'm sure he knows where he's going with it but don't say just read it to understand it. It's half Greek for me and I'm sure for most who have read it.
If that's you in the "upper" box I can understand why you can understand.
What don't you get? The point is that in the original case that started it all there were lots of mistakes by Paul Walker because he neglected to name all the parties he was supposed to name and that calls for dismissing the whole case by the rules.
(SS Complex) Fran Vutnoski, original plaintiff, has filed a motion in Commonwealth Court that may help win this case
Printer Friendly
As anticipated, the Commonwealth Court has rejected the effort by Fran Vutnoski to have the Phillips/Vutnoski Complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Judge Barry Feudale denied the petition without so much of a hearing on the matter. In fact, he denied it without Carl Greco having to file a response to it. What a prick. Here's a copy of Fuedale's ridiculous order. This will be bumped up to the Supreme Court within 30 days where it belongs.
I was in Harrisburg on Wednesday, the 10th, for the purpose of filing a constitutional challenge to the passage of SB850, Act 52 of 2003. That's the legislation that Bob Mellow had rushed through the House and the Senate. He told everyone it was necessary to sell the Complex to the U of S. Of course, Mellow is a big liar. At any rate, it's unconstitutional for any piece of legislation to have more than one subject in it. SB850, Act 52 of 2003 is unconstitutional for that reason. The Complaint is against the entire General Assembly for passing it. It speaks for itself.
-- Edited by Joe Pilchesky on Friday 12th of November 2010 12:23:04 AM
That's not the original title of the thread, and I am certainly not in agreement with the premise of the new heading. Feel free to edit me out of the post as well on that one.
The title of a thread may change many times to accommodate the introduction of updated information or a change in events. Keeping information in one thread prevents splintering and results in readers getting more relevant information at one time. It also makes subsequent searching for information much easier.
Do yourself a favor and start a site of your own. You can call it Iwantmymommy.com. That way you can cry to someone who actually cares. It's often very demanding to keep up with the political pace in this area and there's certainly no time to stop to wipe your ass every time you have a I-want-my-Mommy moment.
Go stand in the corner crybaby and don't come out until I tell you to.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Friday 26th of November 2010 09:57:40 AM
Wow ... does that mean that Glenn got banned? I just am not sure how to take that demeaning post!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I now see why Glenn is upset ... he started the thread therefore I do believe that it should have been his decision if that thread name was changed. It changed the whole train of thought with that thread and it is not a direction that Glenn was looking to go in.
Glenn I don't blame you for being upset with that. I believe that Joe's (The Administrator) response what highly inappropriate ...
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
When you play around in a litterbox, you have to expect to get shat on once in a while.
I don't think any of that nonsense, from the title change to the eloquently mature defense of it, should have come as a suprise to anyone. Least of all Glenn.
I don't think it would have been a surprise ... but he never talked t Glenn that way before ... hmmmm ... and I was right Glenn got banned ... he is one of the original DD posters if I am not mistaken ... not a lot of them left over there.
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice on Saturday 27th of November 2010 03:17:01 AM
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
... he is one of the original DD posters if I am not mistaken ... not a lot of them left over there.
Joe still has his hundreds of log ons, Joann is still on before she goes to jail, and has a few more of her own. After that, there weren't many others to begin with.
Glenn's temporary banishment just stripped them of 85% of their limited credibility. Of course, 85% of not much is still not much, so I guess it wasn't that big of a loss in the end.
GC will be unbanned within a fortnight, following a bogus "I hope you learned your lesson" post from one of them.
I asked him to make the ban permanent and he readily agreed. Now he, his eighty-seven alter egos, and the union people can banter without any dissenting opinion. Enough.
... he is one of the original DD posters if I am not mistaken ... not a lot of them left over there.
Joe still has his hundreds of log ons, Joann is still on before she goes to jail, and has a few more of her own. After that, there weren't many others to begin with.
Glenn's temporary banishment just stripped them of 85% of their limited credibility. Of course, 85% of not much is still not much, so I guess it wasn't that big of a loss in the end.
GC will be unbanned within a fortnight, following a bogus "I hope you learned your lesson" post from one of them.
I personally do not count all of Joe's personas as individual members ... And I don't count Joe and Joann as members as they are the Administrators of that site ... Temporary or not I give Glenn credit for standing up to Joe for a thread that he created and they hijacked it and turned it into something that Glenn never intended it to be ...
Everyone who is bannished from the Land of Joey gets that Email ... change your thinking to our way of thinking and we will let you post again ... They do not want any free thinking people posting on that site.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
i didn't even get to make a post -- he simply didn't like the user name i used at dd. and THAT's saying something, because he's got some pissers over there
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Of course I assume you know this yet another "alias". Right Glenn? So much for friendship aye? Too bad his balls aren't as big as his ego maybe he would have the guts to address you directly!
Ironic moment of the day!! Check out the first post in this thread. Yaaaaaa he is for and against you! He sounds like Gary DiBileo, who also feels strongly both ways about any issue.
Glenn's credibility is circling the drain. Shame that someone very sensitive to important public services was appointed to that seat, perhaps Sherry would have accepted an invite to take it?
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Thursday 8th of September 2011 03:03:15 PM
The reference to testicles is a dead give-away that this is Pilchesky. He seems to have an unusual fixation on that sort of thing....for a supposed hetrosexual that is...
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
If this doesn't creep you out Glenn, doesn't it at least embarrass you a bit? Seriously!!! Doesn’t this jerk-off know we can tell when he is speaking in "another voice"?
They should BOTH be sued. They're both at fault. You can't tell me Pilchesky didn't see those ss numbers. After all these years of posting documents that had lots of information redacted he missed this? No sale.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Friday 14th of October 2011 04:46:52 PM
His minions take it seriously....he is intentionally lying to them....he is having conversations between himself and his HUGE ego AND it is thought that you are his friend......you should be creeped out and embarrassed to let that impression remain in place.
It's all a big game...and I am his friend, though I find myself on opposite sides of the fence from him more and more. Like when he changes my heading even though I consider this (extremely questionable) deed matter very serious.
If you noticed, there is no "announcement" of anything discovered past the initial letter and response, even though I have accumulated much more research on the matter. I expected an explanation with some details outlining where I can locate the requested information to satisfy my inquiry.
There isn't any to be had, apparently...and that shouldn't be.
You sounds like a battered spouse Glenn, you know the kind that makes excuses like "I know he beats the $hit out of me from time to time, but I love him".
Oh, and if this is how your friends treat you Glenn, then I'm curious as to what your enemies do.
-- Edited by Agamemnon on Saturday 15th of October 2011 03:01:06 PM
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
My God who in their right mind can even think to wish such things on another human being ... even if Joe is writing this stuff ... how in the world does he come up with it to say about himself or anyone else for that matter. Deeply disturbing.
Glenn everyone in this world needs a friend ... even Joe Pilchesky ... but one day you will probably realize that your friendship is all one sided ... but if you are alright with that then who am I to judge. Just be careful because your friend is truly evil. Just my opinion.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.