Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


Glenn I am posing this question to you for more than one reason ... A. because you are an attorney and I am assuming you will know the answer ... and B. because I want to know how it makes an attorney feel when Joe does this.

Is it legal for Joe Pilchesky to be offering his services to people who are in need of legal help?  I am thinking that since he does not have a liscense to practice law that it would not be legal to make his services available to the general public.  And what recourse does someone have in order to stop this man from doing this.  I would think that the attorneys in the area might want to make an example of Joe as his is taking away from their livlihood ....

Here is an example of one post ... but if you take a trip around DD you will see where Joe has made this offer to many people. 

Gatelli KOs Pentacostal Church in zoning appeal

Joe Pilchesky

240809?AWSAccessKeyId=1XXJBWHKN0QBQS6TGPG2&Expires=1282780800&Signature=RGs4UnkiDzLFv%2FFEwQma%2FBLFId0%3D&1273534997

Posts: 7936
Date: Aug 14 11:06 PM, 2010
 Printer Friendly

Beat reporter wrote:

Looks like Gatelli can still bring it. It was a small war at the zoning board meeting last night when Gatelli and the church went toe-to-toe. The church was already granted zoning approval but Gatelli and her neighborhood association appealed.

Good old Gatelli must be well rested. She was full of energy and plenty of hot air, too. She claims the place is a "hall", and not a church.  Apparently, her argument was very convincing because the board changed its mind.

It sure looks like a church to me.




Dear church goers. 

Call me.  341-8005

I've heard you can't afford the appeal.   Sometimes, you don't need money, you just need the right friend.  Call me even if you can afford the lawyer.  More lawyers than not will sell you out.  You may have already been sold out.  Happens all the time in this county. 

 



__________________
"Justice doesn't have to be fair, equitable or honorable - it just has to be justice"



__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


What Constitutes Unauthorized Legal Practices?

While there are various ways an individual may engage in unauthorized legal practices. Usually, the unauthorized practice of law arises in instances where a reasonable person is likely to believe that the individual is authorized to practice law. For example, the following constitute common and obvious indicators of the unauthorized practice of law:

•an attorney representing a client in court in a state without having a license in that state
•an attorney filing documents in a case which is pending in a state where the attorney is not licensed to practice
•an individual holding themselves out as an attorney when in fact they are not an attorney
an individual offering a legal opinion when they are not an attorney
•the use of “attorney at law,” “attorney,” or “Esq.” after an individual’s name when the individual is not an attorney

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


One cannot offer legal advice when one is not an actively-licensed attorney, even for free.  Can somebody write up a contract on their own?  Sure.  Can somebody explain a legal term (life estate) in a deed?  Most likely.

It's like the famous "porn" comment.  When someone is engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, you will know it when you see it.  I remember being in a creditors' hearing and watching the trustee rip somebody to shreds when they admitted receiving assistance from their friend who was a legal secretary.  The firm got sanctioned and the secretary was fired.

I have a feeling that Joe has researched this matter and knows the fine line.  The trouble is that fine lines are not always clearly seen.

GC


__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


I think that on more than one occassion he has crossed over that fine line ... in the past with Sam Patilla and Daniel Hubbard and most recently with this Pentacostal Church. He is offering his services and making statements that he is more reliable than local lawyers ... if you see the post above he is making the statement that local lawyers will "sell them out" ... that sounds to me like he has crossed that line.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


Along the same lines, we have stuff like this from Pilchesky all the time...


"I've approached another party who I believed would want to help save this park. I made the same request for money to help with the furtherance of this marathon legal battle. He couldn't get his checkbook out fast enough. "

The original thread can be linked here.

My question is this:  how can this guy actively solicit money for others and not have it be a form of income that he would need to report?  As far as a I know he doesn't operate a charity or other public service organization, so how does anyone know that any money given to him doesn't go to, say, the "keep Edith out of the pokey" fund?





-- Edited by Agamemnon on Saturday 21st of August 2010 03:51:06 PM

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


it's called "P I M P I N ' "

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
RE: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


rish

645001?AWSAccessKeyId=1XXJBWHKN0QBQS6TGPG2&Expires=1283990400&Signature=FhWaNApV26lrTgLVrDshLIsOKPs%3D&1249701531

Posts: 15
Date: Aug 31 4:47 PM, 2010
EARLY BIRDS
 Printer Friendly


whisper.gif RUNNING silent, but RUNNING DEEP! Undercurrent waves bringing Gary D.closer to the COURThouse. Big splash, breaking waves Wm.COURT/ RIGHT (for the job) looking to set sail up the N.Wash Ave River.. To Captain the sinking ship S.S. Scranton. Shipmate(s) trying to quash rumors NOW.but sails are being hoisted for the popular WESTIE!!flyleft



nepaguy
Posts: 470
Date: Aug 31 7:03 PM, 2010
 Printer Friendly

What?

Glenn Cashuric
Posts: 260
Date: Aug 31 7:46 PM, 2010
 Printer Friendly

Awww...we have a special needs poster now.

GC


Just one, Glenn?  hmm

__________________



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


I don't know what it was, but that post just irritated the hell out of me.  Maybe it was the bee sting.  Maybe.  I doubt it.

GC


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


they're just shuckin' and jivin' these days aren't they?

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


Saying "special needs" was being kind on Glenn's part.  I'm thinking the poster was high on crystal meth when he/she wrote it.

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


Or, it was simply yet another in a long line of functionally retarded, low IQ, bottomfeeding posters that Pilchesky seems to have cornered the market on.

Show the cat the litterbox, and you'll see noting but turds in it from that point forward.

Good show, Joseph. Money just can't buy that kind of comedy entertainment.

-- Edited by Paul on Thursday 2nd of September 2010 08:36:05 AM

__________________



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 



"Show the cat the litterbox, and you'll see noting but turds in it from that point forward."


Comparing Joe's posters to cats is insulting...to cats.

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: A question for Glenn Cashuric ....
Permalink  
 


not to mention the litter box!! hehehehehhe

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard