Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Joe Pilchesky's "Manifesto"


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
Joe Pilchesky's "Manifesto"
Permalink  
 


I'm going to post this one also under "important posts", but I read this and I was immediately though that it may not survive in its native form forever, so all the more reason to immediately save it for posterity (or is that "evidence"?).

I've noted some of the best sections in red bold text.



Joe Pilchesky


Posts: 7936
Date: Aug 15 3:10 AM, 2010
When does public service become self service and when does self service become entitlement?
Printer Friendly


It's been an absoulte stunning and shocking experience for me to travel through the underground corridors of politics in Lackawanna County. If I were to write a book about it I wouldn't be quite sure where to start.  The intrigue is an addiction magnet, but what's prominently intriguing is the blatant nature of the audacity these public officials have adopted as status quo. Everything in this county/city is controlled by something political. Everything.

The legal system

There was a time, like before I got my feet wet in the legal system, that I was of the naive belief that a judge's duty was to ensure that the truth prevailed. Now, I know that the truth has nothing to do with their duty. Now, I know that the judge's duty is to do what the political machine wants it to do. Well, at least at this level. In Cordaro, I encountered dirty judges here, dirty judges in Commonwealth Court, but clean judges in the Supreme Court. As in many of the cases I've filed, there were hundreds of lawyers who already knew what I found out, yet not one of them stepped forward to right a wrong. Lawyers I've argued against, like Carl Greco, Tim Hinton, Tom Helbig, Jim Tierney, Gene Hickey, Joe O'Brien, George Reihner, Joe Toczydlowski, Brian Yeager, Chris Cullen and Dave Rinaldi have absolutely no problem blatantly lying in pleadings and repeating them in court agruments.Noshame whatsoever. No dignity whatsoever.  Not only does nothing happen to them for lying, the judges rule in their favor based on their lies. And what happens to dirty judges? Nothing. They have absolute immunity. It's heartwrenching to know that no matter how you plead the truthful facts, a local judge is going to rule as he's told. They are the guardians angels of all things corrupt around here.

The people.

My first definition of "cancer" in this area was that it was the politicians. After two years, I switched to the media for the way it protects it's chosen ones. But, five years into this experience, there's no question that the true "cancer" is the people who live here.  It's this 'cancer" that changes a public servant into a self-servant. Why? Because even a good public servant in office long enough experiences that he/she is fighting for people who don't care. Fighting for people who won't fight for themselves/get their hands dirty.  The fact of the matter is this; the corrupt element of our society shows more appreciation and loyalty to a dirty public official than the public shows to a clean one.  It's a thankless job fighting for the people in this area. I know. I've been doing it for five years now. The people in this area are more than happy to let someone else do the dirty work. Worse than that, they won't even vote. I like the battle of taking down the corrupt public officials, exposing them and humiliating them. Any benefit to the people is a natural collateral consequence of my own personal agenda. The people here deserve Chris Doherty, Ken McDowell, Mike Washo and their like.  There's no question about that, but that's not a good enough reason to allow them to go unpunished.

Masked public officials

We have them everywhere, from City Hall to the Courthouse to the SSD, posing as concerned public officials. Flying under the radar, so to speak. County row officers come in at 10 and leave at three. We have a DA who is dirty to the core,yet he was unchallenged last election. Rose Novembrino, our city controller. She controls nothing. She's sat behind that desk for 20 years and did not one audit. She's paid out millions with no clue what she paid for. She's single-handedly ruined this city. TheSSD is just a whorehouse, a job clearinghouse for anyone connected to any of the board directors. The SHA, SRA, SPA, SSA and Rec. Authority have unfetterd power to spend us into oblivion, and answer to no one. And what will the people do about it? Not a thing, but keep on paying out the ass. 

Fat Farm

It sucks to live here, it really does. Insulting to walk among the people. The ethical standards of the people who live here are practically non-existent. Not all of them, but most of them. Sufficient in number for the media to be motivated to baffle them with any kind of bullshyt it pleases. And, they're stupid. They believe what the media tells them. Like the rest of the country, NEPA is a big Fat Farm. Fat on entertainment and conveniences. Electronically paralyzed with a cell phone and a remote, fascinated by texting, playing video games and watching men playing with a ball, any ball, while government feasts on their wallets and oppresses them. But, no problem propogating, raising children who will grow up to be equally as fat, or fatter, unable to even process the corruption around them, let alone take a stand against it.

"Bruce, when the forest becomes so overgrown with brush, the time comes when it must be set on fire for the forest to survive" - Batman   

Fear of retaliation

Rich or poor, the people here are afraid of their own shadows. So many jobs here are so connected to something political somewhere that the fear of retaliation in the form of losing that job silences them. And if it not the fear of losing a job, it's the fear of somehow "being in the paper".  And if it's not either of them, it's the fear of the dreaded "black helicopter" or "big brother". 

Thus, the vital importance of this site, somewhere to go anonymously to participate in exposing things corrupt.  DD has imposed itself on both the corrupt public officials and the "cancer", the people. We've flexed our free speech muscle in collective strength and it has proven sufficient to rid us of many dirty public officials, overcoming apathy in the process.  It's not quite as effective as burning Scranton to the ground, but we've publicly burned enough public officials to put the fear of DD into them.

It works, as we have experienced. We've appropriately taken our place in history, so let's keep writing it. I'll keep this canvass available, you keep on painting. The formula for success, however, is to get more and more voters out in elections. That's what "they" are doing at the moment, by the way, recuiting more voters.    








__________________
"Justice doesn't have to be fair, equitable or honorable - it just has to be justice"




So Joe Pilchesky is saying directly in his post above that the following attorneys have repeatedly lied in court:

Carl Greco
Tim Hinton
Tom Helbig
Jim Tierney
Gene Hickey
Joe O'Brien
George Reihner
Joe Toczydlowski
Brian Yeager
Chris Cullen
Dave Rinaldi


I'm curious as to whether or not Glenn Cashuric, being an attorney himself, would agree with Joe's statement.  Lying in court is very, very bad. 

He is also saying that City Controller Rose Novembrino has "single handedly ruined this city".

He is saying that the District Attorney is "dirty to the core".


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky's "Manifesto"
Permalink  
 


Wow ... what else does one say to this post ... the only thing that comes to mind is WOW!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky's "Manifesto"
Permalink  
 


It's amazing really.  I can't see how these lawyers wouldn't demand that the post comes down, although maybe that's Pilchesky's plan in the first place, being the attention whore that he is.

I love the Batman quote.  A cartoon character is a fitting reference in Joe's world.

I also love the fact that he basically calls all of his followers out as being unworthy of this help.  That's right in line with this own past statements about the "flock".


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky's "Manifesto"
Permalink  
 


I don't know whether or not any of the attorneys ever "lied" in court.  I work primarily in estate planning, taxation and real estate.  Not often do I see the interior of a courtroom or find myself opposing these individuals.

Most items in litigation are open to interpretation, so who am I to tell you somebody lied when they may have believed their argument was valid?  But Joe has had some frustrating decisions against him.  He certainly knows his way around civil procedure and can hold his own on technical matters with the best lawyers, but in certain substantive matters his legal analysis tends to get a tad hazy. 

For example, I believe he had McDowell tossed within three months of taking office by proving the intent of the Home Rule Charter when it involved any elected official who managed county funds.  Unfortunately, he went for the "literal interpretation" route and tried to define "chief clerk"...

Simplicity is always preferred.  People do not understand this.

GC


__________________


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
Joe Pilchesky's "Manifesto"
Permalink  
 


Glenn,

Was that a fox-trot or a tango?  Electric (city) slide perhaps?  I couldn't tell.

Look, you know as well as I do that an attorney has no "product" to manufacture.  What they provide is knowledge of the law and the intellectual capital to turn that knowledge into something of benefit for their clients.  Yes, you can look at win-loss statistics for a trial attorney, you could look at total judgements won, but I've rarely seen that kind of stuff published in a public domain.  So if there is no widget to judge, no win-loss record to compare, what are the things that drive business to an attorney?

Could one of those other things be reputation?

What Pilchesky did in the post was basically say "Don't trust those guys because they lie".  How can that not be harmful to their reputations?

"...open to interpretation..."?  Okay Glenn, man-up on this one and interpret the following phrase:


"...have absolutely no problem blatantly lying in pleadings..."

You're being an apologist for a guy who slandered your peers.  You are giving this guy a pass for God knows what reason, a pass that I know you wouldn't give others. 

Hell, I don't know you Sir, but if someone wrote a post here saying that ""Glenn Cashuric blatantly lies in court" I'd be among the first to say that such an assertion was unfair at best and slanderous at worst.  Why?  Call it common decency, call it respect for an officer of the court, call it whatever you want.  Regardless, you mean to tell me that you can't see this as being plainly wrong?  Have your sensibilities been that dulled?


-- Edited by Agamemnon on Sunday 15th of August 2010 09:46:12 AM

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky's "Manifesto"
Permalink  
 


Some attorneys in the area are less than ethical.  I can tell you stories that are more damning than those from Pilchesky.  That said, I assume it is like any other profession.  A few bad apples.

I would have to see a specific instance before I could say someone lied in court, however.

GC


__________________


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky's "Manifesto"
Permalink  
 


So Joe is wrong to have called them liars Glenn?

(you're making progress...all be it slowly)


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky's "Manifesto"
Permalink  
 


11311-2.jpg

__________________



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky's "Manifesto"
Permalink  
 


Fat Farm

It sucks to live here, it really does(Joe then it is my opinion that if you feel it sucks to live here ... by all means please do the City of Scranton a favor and MOVE OUT!) Insulting to walk among the people. The ethical standards of the people who live here are practically non-existent.(This is something that you and your bride have first hand knowledge of ... afterall it was the bride that robbed her dying/dead father's estate and is awaiting sentencing for her crime .... talk about having no ethical standards ... it's insulting to have to walk with the both of you!) Not all of them, but most of them. Sufficient in number for the media to be motivated to baffle them with any kind of bullshyt it pleases. And, they're stupid. They believe what the media tells them. Like the rest of the country, NEPA is a big Fat Farm. Fat on entertainment and conveniences. Electronically paralyzed with a cell phone and a remote, fascinated by texting, playing video games and watching men playing with a ball, any ball, while government feasts on their wallets and oppresses them. But, no problem propogating, raising children who will grow up to be equally as fat, or fatter, unable to even process the corruption around them, let alone take a stand against it. (Aren't we just so damn lucky to have you to point out all of our flaws ... and you little sheep think that you have respect for them ... didn't you once refer to them as bottom feeders ... I don't for the life of me know why they worship the ground that you walk on)

"Bruce, when the forest becomes so overgrown with brush, the time comes when it must be set on fire for the forest to survive" - Batman 

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard