Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Since When Has Proof Ever Been Required @ DD?
Post Info TOPIC: Since When Has Proof Ever Been Required @ DD?
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
Since When Has Proof Ever Been Required @ DD?
Permalink  
 

Joe Pilchesky

pee-wee-herman.jpg

Posts: 7878
Date: Aug 2 5:14 PM, 2010
Printer Friendly

erinnobraugh wrote:

Only in Scranton would you see this. In cities all over the country they embrace their colleges and universities. Here in Scranton, they attack them.

In cities all over the country the universities "contribute" real cash to the cookie not, not nickles and dimes.

The PILOT payment was a payment of goodwill. The University wasn't required to pay a dime.

It's smart business to give the people a bucket of apples after stealing the whole fvcking orchard. I would, too.

Also ... from my understanding the University only asked for air space, no roads would be closed and they were even creating a new court that would run from Monroe to Quincy.

Sucks when the buck stops at Janet Evans, instead of at a lowlife, Irish whore like Chris Doherty, doesn't it?  Expect more of the same, a lot more. It's only the beginning.


She might be your Wonder Woman, but Janet Evans is no match the people at the University. They made her look like an ass.

Yes, she is our Wonder Woman, and will be for a long time to come, and she'll get the appropriate support in that regard. Did the university pull it over on her or not? Didn't they take their ball and run home to the Times?  You won't live long enough to see the day that Father Park Thief Pilarz will make Janet Evans look like an ass.  He's too stupid to pull that off, even with the help of the Times.


I for one wonder how the people on this board who adore this woman would comment if it were Doherty, McDowell etc. who was robbing Workers Comp and still serving on Council.

Prove that statement.


*****************

I love that last statement from Pilchesky...

"Prove that statement"

Where was this standard when:

...Chris Doherty was accused of having an affair?
...Chris Doherty was accused of death of two children?
...Judy Gatelli was accused of stealing?
...Sherry Nealon-Fanucci was accused of not living in Scranton?
...etc.
...etc.
...etc.

Proof?  What f*&king proof?  DD is ALL ABOUT LIES AND INUENDO.  The fact that now one is directed to Janet shouldn't make a load of difference.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Since When Has Proof Ever Been Required @ DD?
Permalink  
 

It makes all the difference in the world to the kids across the hall ... it's that famous DD Double Standard. You only need to have proof if you go against their Queen.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
Since When Has Proof Ever Been Required @ DD?
Permalink  
 

This post has been up for weeks funny no demand for any proof......hummmmmmmmmmm <<<<<on another note...defination of ironic....making fun of a persons schooling or lack there of while using he's instead of he is and spelling high school hih school......>>>>>


DEM4LIFE
Posts: 46
Date: Jul 21 7:02 AM, 2010
Printer Friendly

SHERIDAN IS A MORON HE'S A HIH SCHOOL DROP OUT AND A EX DRUGIE, HE HAD TO PAY TO GET HIS GED


-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Wednesday 4th of August 2010 09:48:42 AM

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Since When Has Proof Ever Been Required @ DD?
Permalink  
 

You don't understand ... well it's simple ... it has not been written about Queen Janet so therefore they are able to say whatever it is they want about whomever they want. As long as they don't slam the Queen and her alleged squeaky clean image.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Since When Has Proof Ever Been Required @ DD?
Permalink  
 

You gotta love this kind of posting.  Maybe, just maybe the reason is that he actually hasn't done anything criminally wrong.  I know, that might be too much to bear for your average dyed in the wool Joe-is-my-god follower.




County mounty

726694?AWSAccessKeyId=1XXJBWHKN0QBQS6TGPG2&Expires=1282176000&Signature=D4juxtCnyQHW3xBKUIOKz8fA6Tk%3D&1252670892

Posts: 281
Date: Aug 7 1:09 AM, 2010
Skrep gets two years - it's a long and hard fall for a football star/crony
Printer Friendly

Here's the problem with this. Skrep did nothing more or less than nearly every other public official in a position to influence contracts.  He's a piker compared to Chris Doherty.  If he gets two years for his dealings, what the hell are Bob and AJ looking at if they're convicted? 

All that's been uncovered on Doherty and nothing yet. 

What's the holdup?


__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Since When Has Proof Ever Been Required @ DD?
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard