I have stood 5 feet away from lots of people (you included) and I have never felt moved to broadcast that fact and the location over the internet...especially to a bunch of loons who's grasp on reality is tenuous at best. I am sorry my friend this one was just plain weird on your part and I repeat ....your bitterness is starting to show big time!
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Friday 28th of May 2010 09:52:56 AM
I read the thread ... somewhat disturbing ... not the worst thing I have ever read on DD ... but to report that he is texting and what he is wearing. I ask you this ... who in the world does not have unlimited texting these days. And who cares what color polo shirt he is wearing.
I know Ken McDowell and I have to say that it is reported on DD all of the time that he is disrespectful to women ... well he has always been quite respectful to me. It is reported that he is a bad father ... yet I see him out with his daughter all of the time. It was reported about the troubles in his marriage (former marriage) .... there are always three side to every story ... his side ... her side and then there is the truth ... which only the two of them know. Everything else is pure speculation.
If the guy isn't doing his job then talk about that ... but his personal life is just that personal ... keep the hell out of it.
Were you drinking that night Glenn?.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Of course not. And watch what you're inferring. As a matter of personal policy, my BAC stays at 0.0 (or an hour must elapse after one drink) whenever I have my car keys. Too bad other certain people do not feel that way.
Ah...must be hard to maintain such a level of perfection. Well, Happy Memorial Day.
GC
P.S. If you've noticed (sure you haven't), my new goal is an Apple Store in Lackawanna County. Need support.
i am willing to lend support if you are willing to give your opinion on how long Edith needs to be incarcerated for bilking her dead fathers mulahhhhhh. Oh and I didn't think Lus was insulting you I sorta felt she was handing you an easy excuse for the weirdness.....she didn't infer you were dinking and driving, I think she hoped you were drinking and posting.
The very last person to ever claim any measure of perfection is Lus. In fact if you read bulk of her posts you see someone who is more than capable of being self-critical. If you are looking for meglamaniacs to aim at, set your sight at Joe Pilchesky. When last I checked it's a wonder he can fit his ego through most door frames.
The above noted, Lus is 1000% correct. Your "reporting" is the kind of thing that usually appears in the tawdry gossip section of supermarket tabloids (although in fairness, your average tabloid, such as the Weekly World News, is a big step up from DD). Stick to knocking him about his performance on the job...or lackthereof...and leave his personal life out of it.
PS - Apple sucks. Their success is more a function of poor competition than anything else, and their closed architecture is something to be frightened of, not embraced. You really want Apple (really Steve Jobs) decidiing what you can and can not have on your phone/pc/etc? Their fight with Adobe over Flash is an enormous mistake. Jobs doesn't look very good and the moment he resigns for health reasons the market value of Apple will crash by 15% minimun.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Fair enough. I will limit my critiques to his nonexistent "substantial changes" in his office from now on.
As someone who is now desperately trying to become even fractionally proficient in Adobe Creative Suite 5, I agree wholeheartedly about the Abode/Apple feud over Flash. However, I believe that the establishment of a retail anchor like the Apple Store would do wonders for the 500 Lackawanna project.
Then I can go after a real Starbucks, the Lego Shop, and a Banana Republic.
Screw Banana Republic...I'd prefer to see an IKEA around here. Plymouth Meeting (or wherever the hell it is) is just too far to drive.
As for Creative Suite 5, I am hoping to get it at work in June so I will be feeling your pain. My limited experience with Captivate has me cautiously optimistic though.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Actually I was not hoping that he was drinking at all ... I just assumed that he must have been as I do not ever remember him being so strange with his postings before. I am the furthest thing from perfection in this world. Which I suppose is why I point out that those of us who live in glass houses should not throw stones. You my friend are the one who seems to place himself above others. Your arrogance is quite apparent. I can tell you I am not the smartest person in the world ... but I am by no means dumb ... I am not a raving beauty ... but not quite ugly. I say what is on my mind ... and I really try hard not to judge others personal lives as mine is somewhat of a trainwreck. You however are very judgemental.
And I guess you don't like it when someone makes an assumption that you were in a bar, exhibiting strange behavior as evidenced by your DD post and thought .... Wow he must have been drunk. Now how the hell was I to know you were or were not driving? I don't stalk around looking for you ... watching to see if you drove ... to see what you were drinking ... or who you might have had a conversation with ... or to know that you text a lot ... that's your thing not mine because in the end I do not really care what you do ... but I will comment on something and if you don't like it then tough $hit ... freedom of speech ... when was the last time you told Joe Pilchesky to watch what he infers? Oh that's right there are special rules for Joe and they don't apply to me ... he has free speech and I don't! ... and I didn't say you were drinking ... I asked if you were .... So get Fvcked! How's that for a bit of free speech!
NICE!
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice on Sunday 30th of May 2010 12:10:00 PM
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I would like to say that I am sorry Glenn ... but I am not. I just get tired of your special rules for the world ... yet no rules for Joe Pilchesky and Joanne Pilchesky. If I robbed my dying/dead fathers estate and there were an article in the paper you and the kids across the hall would be screaming about how horrible I am and calling for me to spend the rest of my life in a jail cell ... they do it and it must have been to help further the cause.
If I beat a sleeping drunk with a tire Iron ... again I would be expected to go to jail for it ... Joe must have had a very good reason .... If I stalked the DD gang the way they stalk people (which you seem to now be doing) ... the DD'ers would call the police and slapy my ass in jail ... hmmmmm .... don't you think it's weird that DD posters hold themselves in higher regard then they show others. Whatever happened to treat people the way you yourself would want to be treated? If you wouldn't want someone to do or say something about you then ... you should not be saying those very same things about others.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Joe gets what you call "Bully Rules" applied to him by some (but not here), I have to say especially by Glenn. These are the rules that apply only to bullies, and exist so that the bully doens't come after you. That's why Pilchesky can call Stacy Brown '******' and it doesn't even rate a peep on DD by Glenn. Now if Ken McDowell were to use an equally vile racial epithet, well Glenn would be on that like Edith was on her late father's checking account.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
actually to be fair Glenn did speak up vehemently about the Stacy Brown event he even quit DD over it....alas his moral outrage did not last long and in a very short time he was back posting away. It was the Jeremy Burton Gay Jewish epithet, the Edith stealing her dead fathers money, the stalking of elected officials, the sexual innuendos thrown at Sherri Fannuci, the attacks on elected and public figure's children, the so called "outing" of Mr Mellow, ect....ect...ect that garnered little to no comments from Glenn I believe. :)
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Monday 31st of May 2010 09:44:01 AM
So get Fvcked! How's that for a bit of free speech!
Is that Latin for "go sodomize yourself"?
GC
No Glenn, it's Latin for "go get yourself some help."It's obvious your defeat to Kenny took an extreme mental toll on you - similar to how a victim of a violet crime feels. Your postings down the hall exhibit the basic profiler package of someone with revenge against those who you feel have ruined your (life) political career and it doesn't look good for someone who represents the law and real estate communities. The end does not justify the means, never has, never will. I can't tell you what to do, but I've seen people who are consumed and it appears you're not too far off from self-destructing. Go work on something you can control like selling a house or closing a real estate deal.
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
Nope. We expected him to win. The goal was John Mellow's exit from the office. What annoys me is the way the controller/former tax collector uses his elected offices as nothing more than a paycheck source while boatloads of other people pay the price financially and emotionally. Who "misplaces" almost two million dollars?
In any event...the obsession, it seems, is on this board. Must not be that obvious from inside the cage.
You ran for office in the hopes of not winning ... with only the hope of Mellow being ousted from office ... I find that very very very hard to believe. That must have gone over big with your supporters ... the people who believe that you were the best man for the job. So what you are saying is that you were nothing more than a vote grabber ... the very thing that they detest on DD .... hmmmmm.
See now is it all that hard to be critical of the job performance rather than his personal life.
The obsession of the majority of posters on this board is that we don't like the personal attacks on public officials ... but to attack their job performance ... well now that is a completely different story and perfectly acceptable. That is what it is like inside this cage.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Nope. We expected him to win. The goal was John Mellow's exit from the office. [So what you are saying is that people donated to your campaign thinking that you were actually in the race to win, but you knew differently? Did you tell this to the folks who gave the money? "Thanks for the campaign donation...by the way, I have no intention of winning, but thanks never the less".]What annoys me is the way the controller/former tax collector uses his elected offices as nothing more than a paycheck source [It could be worse...he could be on disability] while boatloads of other people pay the price financially and emotionally. Who "misplaces" almost two million dollars? [Ken McDowell apparnetly does, so why then guarantee him the position by running in a race that you apparently had no intention of winning?]
In any event...the obsession, it seems, is on this board. [Obession? Oh, you mean like going through a council member's garbage? Remember that little ditty Glenn?] Must not be that obvious from inside the cage. [Cage? Nahhh...speaking of cages though, we do have the pending future residence of Ms Joanne Pilchesky....care to comment on that one Glenn? Ooooops, forgot you are under orders to keep silent on that particular issue, lest your DD membership get revoked and you become a target. Yes, it's fair game to drudge up "anything and everything on ___________" at DD, but don't dare comment on the actual, real legal troubles of Joe's wife. To quote that great Canadian philosopher Alanis Morissette, "Isn't it ironic, don't ya think?".]
GC
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
2. I have no problem with Judy Gatelli personally, other than the fact that she turned out to be less than ideal as council president after having an extraordinary amount of potential due to her civic leadership and participation in government. She was the wrong politician in the wrong era.
Won't = under Joey's control like a pet Can't = you are their consulting attorney (or more) and are ethically barred from discussing the case. If you are, how stupid will Joey boy look and how embarrassing will it be for you when it comes out (and it will if it is accurate) that the "great and terrible carpenter turned attorney" is really you! If all this time he has been stepping all over you to take all the credit and you allowed it. lol lol lol
Chris Musti withdrew from the running. I have a letter in hand that he faxed over to Harry McGrath.
Mm-hmm. So I was barely even in the wrong pew on that one. Besides, one does not run for the vice-chair position. One is appointed. Since there are two men (and one potential incumbent) running, the vice-chair must be a woman.
I like Chris. I really do. But he has been doing some odd things lately.
Glenn Chris Musti has been doing odd things for years ... it's not just a lately thing for him. Where have you been ... he is an arsonist ... He was thrown out as a constable for drawing his gun on someone ... are you kidding and just in general he is a very odd strange little man ... hmmmmm but I am glad that you noticed it even if you think it's something new for him.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I meant odd things in a political sense, but they do tie in to the activities mentioned above. I simply don't understand how Chris thinks he's being groomed for a leadership position in the party considering his rather lengthy list of past indiscretions. He is also closely involved with Bob Sheridan and the director's sudden (and also odd) desire to become the leader of the county committee.