Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 48
Date:
Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


Pilchesky has repeatedly bloviated about how much traffic his site gets...

Yet now that McGoof has been posting those idiotic videos about Gatelli, Covington nonsense and so on, one look at the number of views reveals that, in the span of weeks, they are only getting a few dozen views. And as such, probably a far closer reality of how much traffic and unique visitors DD.com actually gets.

Either that, or even the DD'ers rapidly got tired of McGoof's nonsense and don't waste their time watching his videos either.

The truth revealed. Ooops. Thanks, McGoof. You are such a tool.

__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


You do not have a clue of what you are talking about. Youtube has had problems keeping track of views for years and when a video is watched from a hosting site such as Doherty Deceit it does not count as a view on youtube's site.

__________________


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


So what 'Lus___' is saying is that there is bad accounting????  Whether the hit accounting on the videos is properly accounted for or not is irrelevant, just like McNutt.

What's funny are the lengths that some of Pilchesky's followers will go in order to be loved and noticed by their svengali.  I've seen one or two of the videos...they scream "Daddy, notice me!!", and that's about it.

Oh, and for the record, the 'Lus___' name violates our posting rules:


Vulgarity: You will not post words or display images, videos, etc. that, in the opinion of Forum Moderators, are vulgar, obscene, graphically violent, graphically sexual show or depict the harming of minors/children, exploit images of children, or are otherwise objectionable.


I'm asking the (real) Lus to either change the name (if that's even possible) or delete the account.  If only the latter is possible, 'Lus___' can re-register under a name that doesn't include a vulgar slang.  That kind of bull$hit may make Joe giggle like a little school girl at DD, but we actually make an attempt to enforce our rules here.

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


I agree with Agam....LusT##T why don't you just post as McCrazy? That is of course who you are....

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 48
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


Got to be McNut as he just loves those expletives.

So, sorry, McNutty... apparently you don't know much about how video streaming works. Whether a video is embedded in another site or not doesn't change the view count one bit, as the actual video hosting and count tracking is all still done back at YouTube's server.

When somebody views the video on DD.com, it still has to go back to YouTube to get the video, and the code that increments the view count is built right into the server that serves the Flash video, you can't get around it.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


Heywood!!   Please stop inserting facts into McCrazy’s wild assertions.....don't you know the loons across the hall frown on that kind of stuff??? LOL LOL LOL



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


I quite honestly was going to delete the account of the new poster ... however when I went to delete it the task had already been taken care of.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


It wasn't me! 

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


Nor I...although I can't say that I blame whomever did it...

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


Well maybe the poster deleted their own account. It doesn't matter.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


Apparently all of McGoof's detective work was a bust ... MARGIE WINS! See McGoof I told you that nobody cares about unpaid parking violations!!!!!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


I'm thrilled with the win by Attorney Bisignani-Moyle.  She seems like a genuinely good choice, and the fact that she wasn't liked by the likes of McNutt was icing on the cake.

By the way, I know that the many at DD were crying that our next judge was a supporter of Mayor Doherty (not that it matters one iota), but it was not such as a secret that Attorney Castellano had the tacit support of Judge Harhut.  This is the same judge Harhut that DD svengali Joe Pilchesky has accused of all sorts of nonsense.


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 56
Date:
RE: Our old buddy McGoof unwittingly exposes one of Pilchesky's longtime lies
Permalink  
 


its so nice Margie won the good ol boys network took one plus I think Castallano played dirty saying he is qualified for family court.So is margie,but it wasnt only a family court job which Castallano wanted us to percieve GOOD FOR YOU MARGIE.Harhut up yours!The good ol boys network takes a hit.Also did you see how many votes Barrase got over 31000,shesh I didnt think that there were that many dummies in lackawanna county but I guess there is.

__________________
hammer
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard