I put up the entire thread which is an old thread from 2006 ... but the very recent post makes me wonder what the hell this poster means making a statement like this.
Many times she shut down that minister Simmons for just saying the name of God, and then she let that black man talk about God for five minutes when he was pushing for the no smoking ordinance. Then, that Iranian woman spoke about God and no gavel.
Gatelli better get it right and either stop saying the name of God in the pledge of allegiance, or allow everyone to say it.
The only thing you have to worry about with Ursula {Gatelli} is what she will do with her remaining term in Council. I have many relatives in Southside, her "5 minutes of fame" is over!!! She sold out the wrong people in the City...She's "One and done!"...Jimbu15...
__________________ "Here Comes The Revolution...Time For Retribution."
She is going to get what she deserves...we all do, it is just whether or not anyone is around to see it!
__________________
Wow, do I have a lot to learn!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
...or it could be a threat. The moderator of that board once beat a sleeping drunk with a tire iron. One of the regular posters pulled a gun on a neighbor. Another poster faced charges for disrupting a Konsil meeting. Another poster bragged about going through a Konsil member's garbage. I could go on, but the point is made.
Glenn, your statement would hold more weight if we weren't talking about DD.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
It would be a her that made that statement ... she's the woman who spoke out against guns in Council Chambers...
Anyway ... that's what you think Glenn ... I have to say when I read it ... that's not how I took it ... just like anything else I guess it's the way the reader interprets what is said ... I have to say the statement made me pause for a moment. But that is my opinion.
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice on Sunday 18th of October 2009 07:38:33 PM
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Glenn I think you've uttered the phrase "it could have been phrased better" many, many times when referring to DD posts. It's amazing you don't see how that...in and of itself...is problematic. Tell me, at what point do you have so many "it should have been phrased better" incidents that you start to believe that maybe the post is intended to sound threatening?
Honestly, and I mean no disrespect, you sound like an incompetent parent enabling the bad behavior of a bratty child.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Thats a threat plain and simple ! ( it whether or not some one is there to see it) sure the may be just talking crap until boom some one shoots their eye out with a red rider bb gun.Kidding. people love to run off at the chops but talk is talk.cheap! Most people dont have the nuts to follow up on it
If I were the person being talked about in that post I would feel threatened ... plain and simple ... there would be no question in my mind.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.