Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


Apparently pilcheski's next vendetta against Warden Donate is the work-release program with  the County Recycling Center.  He was spied playing photog at both the prison and recycling center - photographing inmates getting on and off a bus.  The MENSA members across the hall are questioning:

a) why inmates are used to work at the recycling center
because otherwise they'd be sitting on their asses watching Oprah or pumping iron out in the yard

b) why are inmates used at a Denaples owned facility
inmates have been manning the recycling center for years -- nothing new here

c) the impact of our local economy by using inmates
is this a job any of us want?? umm, NO

d) and from our long-lost buddy mcgoof who's all pantie-wadded about who's paying for the lunches supplied to prisoners

e) public safety from North Scranton all the way up to (?) Dickson City
DICKSON CITY ???  these inmates are the ones who are imprisones for minimal crimes.  I know, I know -- a crime is a crime, but SOME prisoners are worthy of a work-release program.

Why doesn't he work on something worthwhile for a change??


__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


Not to make you use the word "douchebag" on a sunny breezy Monday afternoon, but does that mean I'm allowed to "borrow" prison labor at the county's expense?  My lawn needs cutting.  My gutters need cleaning.

How much does this cost the county?  Does it put other businesses at a disadvantage?

GC


__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


Hasn't this been going on for years and years???? Why all of sudden question the use of inmates Glenn?

Who is the competition out there for that particular business ... and I'm sure if they wanted to hire work release's that they would be able to apply to have them work at their businesses however most people do not want to hire them.

Maybe ... just maybe the county is making money on this deal ... right to know Glenn ... why don't you do your best Pilchesky imitation and get on that letter straight away!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


I know the answer.  The county is not making a dime.

GC


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


All I know is that is one job I would not want to do. I can't see any of my friends or acquaintances wanting to have that job. I can't see Glenn or Lus doing that job.

If some schlub can get the work done by prison inmates and pay them $5.00 per day and make sure they are given food and something to drink, more power to him. The fact that it happens to be a DeNaples who is the particular lucky bastard in this situation, irks pilcheski to the nth degree. And the inmates (who I am sure are minimum security) are probably thrilled to be out of that cell and breathing some fresh air.

Is ANYone complaining about this other than joe pilcheski? The prisoners get a change of scenery, the county gets it's recycling done and Denaples is chugging right along without having to pay union wages to a houseful of Teamsters. Who is losing here? Oh, that's right ...pilcheski's got a slow post day ... it's either chase the busload of prisoners or talk about some politicos grand-daughter. $hit, maybe he'll be calling the Teamsters after he reads this.

Glenn, I'm sure you can find some neighborhood kid to mow your lawn or clean your gutters for the same five dollars the inmates are getting - except they'll be looking for an hourly rate (not the prison daily rate). And if the prisoners are griping about the $5 daily rate, let them ... but it doesn't seem as though they are ... just pilcheski's got this hard-on for both Donate and DeNaples.

Oh no -- there I go ruining this lovely breezy Monday afternoon talking douchebags with hardons.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


Oh no -- there I go ruining this lovely breezy Monday afternoon talking douchebags with hardons.

Gotcha.

GC


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


Glen don't you find it the least bit ironic that Joeyboy is outraged by the so called "corruption" all around the area but thinks his wife's ripping off of her dead father's estate  A-OK?  Honestly.... how can you possibly take anything he does seriously...please!

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Monday 29th of June 2009 07:16:13 PM

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


Not to make you use the word "douchebag" on a sunny breezy Monday afternoon, but does that mean I'm allowed to "borrow" prison labor at the county's expense?  My lawn needs cutting.  My gutters need cleaning.



Glenn, if instead of a private law practice you were running a county-owned facility, then I say "yes" you might be able to borrow prison labor.  Do the inmates still also help up at Lackawanna County stadium?

Not to get off track here, but I find the prospect of a "Pilchesky going after Louie" deal interesting.  It has all the elements of a really bad early 70's B movie...ridiculous plot, poor acting and a predictable ending.  Now for the record I don't subscribe to the "Louie owns..." or "Louie is mobbed up with..."; that's the kind of fantasy water-cooler gossip I'll leave to the pros at DD.  What I will say this this though:  you don't go from being very poor to being one of the richest men in Pennsylvania by being a dullard.  Pilchesky may play the role of internet/courtroom toughguy really well, but my sense is that Mr DeNaples is the real deal when it comes to being business/legal tough.  Part of me wants Pilchesky to "go after Louie", mainly because Pilchesky will lose his shirt. 

Go for it Joe!!  Take on the man!!  Fight the Power!!


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


There is only one word to describe all of this. Jealousy ... people are jealous of what Louie DeNaples has done with the very little that he started out with ...

And Glenn I have to agree with IHave ... you think that Joe is an expert on corruption and it's all around us ... but none of you Joey loyalists see anything wrong with Joanne ripping off her dying/dead father's estate. How very hypocritical of all of you! I think you get the Hypocrite award Glenn.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Date:
RE: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


My money is on Mr. Denaples. Pilchesky is just that..an Internet Tuff guy, with a felon wife. I call it as I see it. BTW, where the hell would Joe get the money for this? I don't think he is that stupid to try to rip off some other dying elderly! But hey, I can be wrong.

__________________

All Joe ever wanted was a ramp for his disabled father in law.........And his money!

If you can read this, Thank a Teacher.  If you can Read this in English, Thank a Soldier.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


I wouldn't be surprised if Joe went out on the day joanne was convicted and bought a few insurance policies on her. With an attitude like hers, she's bound to get into a few scrapes in prison. joe'll have the best of both worlds once she's off to the slammer.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: pilcheski v. DeNaples?? -or- pilcheski v. County of Lackawanna??
Permalink  
 


Just when is she going for sentencing??? Hasn't it been long enough ... she needs to go and get it over with already.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard