Comical when you think about it: as a "real" poster at DD you are not allowed to post anything critical of Joe, Janet Evans or any of this other chosen people (many of the moderators here have been banned from DD for doing just that), but yet why does Joe on occasion allow some posts that are, in fact blatantly critical...and usually threatening? The answer is simple: Joe creates alter-egos so that he can debate himself. That's what happens when you don't actually want to engage in a debate: you argue with yourself. Hey, don't laugh...it's a sure fire way to always win the argument.
Can you imagine the Les Spindler, Fay Franus crowd reading the "I like Doherty..." posting and actually thinking it's a real poster????? I can see those veins on the side of the Spindler head getting larger and larger as he read it.
Anyway, for your reading pleasure, here is Joe Pilchesky engaging in his favorite form of self-pleasuring...namely arguing with himself (complete with a special election-timed BONUS threat!!).
It's political war. No one understands that more clearly than Joe Pilchesky. He knows the game and he knows the rules.
I learned the old rules quickly, but you folks seem to be having trouble catching up to the new rules, like being the victims for a change instead of being the perpetrators all the time.
The game is shoot first and protect yourself after, if you can, and the rules are that there are no rules. He plays by them as well as anyone.
If it gets too heavy and he can't take it, what's that make him?
A sniper?
He's the one who says it's not what you can dish out, it's what you can take that defines you. There it is. Can he take it or not?
You have a nice day.
Only his hairdresser knows for sure.
What's there to know? I'm still here and you've dished out plenty.
-- Edited by Agamemnon on Tuesday 19th of May 2009 06:38:23 PM
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.