Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Post Info TOPIC: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

If this is an accurate story then Rogan has finished himself in my eyes.  The day you care what Pilchesky thinks about you is the day you stop having a conscience.  That is the day I wipe you off my card as a viable candidate.


Joe Pilchesky

Gladiator.jpg

Posts: 4544
Date: Apr 1 8:06 PM, 2009

I received a call from Mr. Rogan who explained that his site was being edited for updating and his site builder had copied and pasted material from his 2007 site, which included the illegal immigration language.  While the language was copied and pasted with other materials, it was not intended to be a part of the new Rogan site. However, while working on certain features of the site, the immigration language was viewable for a few hours until it was edited off the page an hour or so ago.  

Mr. Rogan said he regrets the temporary exposure of the language at issue, but it was not intentional or meant to offend anyone. Further, he stated that he deeply respects the hard-working Hispanic and Latino community and dedicates his candidacy to representing fairly all citizens of the City of Scranton.


__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

That's quite the turn-around...last time Rogan was warning us about the "great brown horde invading from across the border" now he "deeply respects the hard-working Hispanic and Latino community".  Horse $hit if you ask me.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

Lepoards can't change their spots and Tigers can't change their stripes ... and that racist has not reformed in only 2 years ... Just my opinion!

-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice on Thursday 2nd of April 2009 05:33:38 AM

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
davidevans


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:
Racist you say Lus.
Permalink  
 

What a horrible thing to say about someone who is quite the contrary. All he said is that Illegal is Illegal. Most of you are educated. Better start getting use too him. I was of a differant impression of you good people. Sorry!
I won't respond to this again. The city is divided enough.

__________________
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

I can't believe I'm saying this -- I agree with dave's comment above
illegal IS illegal
If you come to America via the proper channels, you should absolutely be able to enjoy the privileges that come with being a citizen. If you sneak across a border or come here with a student visa and put down permanent roots for nefarious purposes -- your ass should be shipped back from wence you came at the earliest possible moment.

If that is something Rogan said, well I agree with him, but he'll have to come up with a little more than that if he wants my vote.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
Glenn Cashuric


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

Pat Rogan is potentially the best council candidate running in this year's primary. 

He isn't a racist (DD-worthy low blow, there).  The fact that he does not pay property taxes is not an issue with me, as that view is the equivalent of supporting a poll tax.  He has turned out to be a very good speaker on a wide variety of issues.  He is willing to discuss political differences.  He does not subscribe to many of the views on DD, and has said so publicly. As for the illegal immigration issue, I agree with the famous intellectual Sonny Bono, who once said (correctly), "What's to talk about?  It's illegal."

And the Democratic Party is going to do everything in its power to make him lose.

GC

__________________
davidevans


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:
Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

Glenn my old friend, You are oh so correct about the Dem party and Patrick. It started 2 wks ago. The double faces have come to the surface and think they are going undetected. We know them all. While not knowing whom I was, I heard this women say this morning at Chick's Diner that Janet is the Bitch and shes taking those puppies with her to victory. I had to laugh, pay and leave.  David 

__________________
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

Well we here at PD respect all things that are said by the ladies at Chicks ...

Ok I apologize for the racist remark against Mr. Rogan ... I guess I just lumped him right in there with Joe Pilchesky who is clearly a racist ... and since Joe is saying that Mr. Rogan contacts him about getting the word out on the mistake on his webpage ... I lumped him right up there with Joe Pilchesky ... birds of a feather you know ...

So I apologize to Mr. Rogan for that remark ... it is My Opinion that he should rely less on Joe Pilchesky ... I think it would get him further in this election.

Why would the Democratic Party back him? Did he or did he not just become a Dem so he could run in this election ... is he the one who was a republican? Why would the Dems jump in there to help him when they have life long Dems running for the very same office. Am I right about this or am I thinking of someone else? If I am wrong again I apologize to Mr. Rogan.



__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

What Rogan did in the last election is to pander to fears that some have about illegal immigrants.  In my book casting fingers at "those people" (and "those people" could be any group, btw) at best makes me question both his judgment and his integrity.  At worst it makes me wonder whether or not he is in fact a racist.  History is full of very evil people who got their start by pointing fingers at "those people".  No, I am not saying that Rogan is "evil", but what I am saying is that he put himself in some mighty bad company.  The fact that he apparently has softened his position in this area only proves one thing:  a handler was smart enough to tell him "give the anti-illegal thing a rest:".

Now do I think this country should deal with illegal immigration?  Sure.  But when last I checked, it's the Federal Government that is responsible for border security, not Dave Elliot and the SPD.  This is not a business that Scranton's government should be concerned with. 

Unless I have the opportunity to hear this guy speak and he really blows my socks off, then I'll not vote for him.  All I know is this:  in his last campaign, he proved that he's willing to use fear-mongering to get people to vote for him.  For me, that's a tough thing to get over.




-- Edited by Agamemnon on Thursday 9th of April 2009 08:01:26 AM

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
davidevans


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

Is that a soup question, Lus?

Ah, Don't matter.



__________________
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

A soup question?

David you are making no sense at all ... what's wrong? It seems as though something is bothering you.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Heywood Jabuzov


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 48
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

LOL! Make mine a cuppa minestrone.

__________________
davidevans


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

percs


__________________
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

I need subtitles for David's postings...

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Glenn Cashuric


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

I need David's keyboard and a blunt instrument.

biggrin

GC

P.S.  That's right.  It's Emoticon Monday.

__________________
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

  23_1_77.gif 







-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Tuesday 14th of April 2009 07:12:56 AM

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Heywood Jabuzov


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 48
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

Make that a bowl of Pasta Fazul

__________________
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

I'll have what I think David is actually having...namely Thorazine with a scotch tracer.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

I honestly do not undertand the message that David was trying to convey to me ... does anyone understand the "soup" reference ... percs David ... well that didn't tell me much. I still think something is bothering you ... because you were making a bit of sense with your posts and well now ... I'm just not getting the message you are trying to convey to me. You don't have to talk about it but I just thought .... anyway ... someone explain this soup thing to me.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

"percs" may be a reference to percocet, a perscription pain medication.  I think it's essentially the same thing as Oxycodone, also known a "Hillbilly Heroin".

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

Maybe he is on them due to the "serious surgery" he had.....of course they must work like crazy since very shortly after telling us about his "serious surgery" I saw him hauling and screwing up those big ass team signs.  Weird! 

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
davidevans


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

Bingo AG.
And yes I was helping to put up all 1750 signs for tree hole days. It was breast surgery not an organ transplant thank you very much.

__________________
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

David ... you do know that after breast surgery ... one of the very worst thing that you could have been doing is lifting ... you do know that don't you? I am speaking frome experience on this one.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

"...tree hole days..."


30251_tree_hole.jpg

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

davidevans wrote:

 It was breast surgery not an organ transplant thank you very much.



It was a "serious surgery" according to your post.  I stated you were hauling big ass signs around shortly after posting that piece of information.  Please tell me where my comment was inaccurate. 



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
davidevans


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

I am trying hard to avoid answering your ingnorant a$$. I will for the last time.
A 4x8 sign weighs maybe 1+1/2 pds. Tie straps less than a ounce. Hows the pooch?

Lus. I know!  Very painful.

__________________
davidevans


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

ignorant      in case you think i'm drunk.

__________________
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

davidevans wrote:

ignorant      in case you think i'm drunk.


Nahhh, now why would we think that?



never      in case you think we write posts like that.

 



__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

davidevans wrote:

I am trying hard to avoid answering your ingnorant a$$. I will for the last time.
A 4x8 sign weighs maybe 1+1/2 pds. Tie straps less than a ounce.

I can see you are trying hard to avoid answering my questions, and good job you still haven’t.  Did I say the signs were heavy? No! I said they were big and they are ……I said I saw you hanging them shortly after telling us you had “serious surgery”  and I did. So again I ask…what did I post that was factually incorrect?  Sorry… I do think you are ignorant however not because of your misspelled word. I have thought you ignorant for many years based completely on your behaviors.


Hows the pooch?

You are pretty focused on dogs recently you must be spending a lot of time with Fay. 



Lus. I know!  Very painful.



 



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
davidevans


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:
RE: Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Permalink  
 

Sorry Kiddies. I tried to be civil. I no longer will keep you amused. You couple posters enjoy yourselves.
I'm outta here 

__________________
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Rogan pandering to Pilchesky?
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard