Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Free Speech Is One Thing, But Why Needlessly Slander A Sitting Judge?
Post Info TOPIC: Free Speech Is One Thing, But Why Needlessly Slander A Sitting Judge?
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
Free Speech Is One Thing, But Why Needlessly Slander A Sitting Judge?
Permalink  
 

I find this post very interesting (red text by me, not Pilchesky).

Yes, I know that in the United States, we are free (for the most part) to say any stupid thing we like. On other hand, I have to ask: Why? Implying that a judge is...

...receiving bribes ("sold to the highest bidder")
...incompetent ("disgrace to the black robe")
...engaged in other illegal activities ("everything about him was dirty")

...really does seem ill-advised, given the role that judges play in our legal system and society at large. Yes, if a judge truly is guilty of incompetence (Judge Lokuta, for example) I can see stating the facts, but to the best of my knowledge and Google-searching capabilities, no such situation exists in the case of Judge O'Brien. This is truly just Pilchesky not liking Judge O'Brien's decision. Where is the line between "not liking" and "guilty of taking bribes", and when someone like Pilchesky crosses it, is there really no recourse?

Now I know we break Pilchesky's stones here...a lot... but I really think this is a serious issue.





Joe Pilchesky

Posts: 3978
Date: Dec 30 10:03 PM, 2008

First above all, it was Judge "Sold to the highest bidder" O'Brien, retired old prune, Senior Judge. That Geritol crony judge is a disgrace to the black robe.He did his job of having the issue tossed into the appellate system where it'll collect dust waiting for itsturn for argument later this year or early the next. The only thing I liked about him were his scuffed up, dirty sneakers sticking out from underhis robe. Turned out everything about him was dirty.

However, that doesn't mean Gatelli'sissues can't be heard and argued in that OTHER popular court, the court of public opinion. Me and Jude have a date. Better said, we have several.

Pump those pills in Jude, Daddy's comin' home. I know, I know, it's in litigation and you can't talk about it. That's fine. You can just listen. WITH THE REST OF THE CITY.

Dear ECTV, you're welcome in advance for raising your ratings through the roof pre-election. The people love to watch Hitler, blowjob queen Councilwoman Judy Gatelli............................suffer, politically speaking, of course.



(edited for spellig error Brides--->bribes) :)
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 07:15, 2009-01-09

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 08:53, 2009-01-09

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: Free Speech Is One Thing, But Why Needlessly Slander A Sitting Judge?
Permalink  
 

Ag, he feels if he thinks (insert rumor here) enough, and says (insert rumor here) enough, and enough people hear (insert rumor here) from the likes of him, and enough people comment on (insert rumor here) ... (insert rumor here) will eventually become the truth in their own minds.

And those of us who know better can go to our ICN meetings, share our secret handshake and toast pilcheski's demise (politically speaking, of course) with copious amounts of wings and beer.

(you'll all be pm'ed with the place, date and time for the next meeting)

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Free Speech Is One Thing, But Why Needlessly Slander A Sitting Judge?
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard