I am sure that he would be shouting it from the rooftops if he did ... I know that poor Mr. Conrad (the father-in-law) served in the military and fought for our country ... as Joe has told that story many many times ... but I don't ever remember him saying that he himself ever served.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
He's not the type to take orders from any person with something nasty hangin' and swangin' between the legs ... with the possible exception of maybe janet evans.
After the recent court decision being pro-mayor (Joe had declared the mayor was going to lose this case) Joe has to rally the troops with a death threat from a new screen name he created. Talk about taking the bait!
A bullet has Joe Pilchesky's name on it. You can try to find me if you like.You can trace the IP and the email that allowed me entry into this forum.Dead ends. You sent all of my letters to the FBI, didn't you?Dead ends. You won't find me, yet you see me often. I must say access to this forum is conveniently easy.You've come too far with the promise of going much, much further. That cannot be allowed to happen.There's no need to explain the reasons for that to you.You're a very sophisticated thinker.
I greatly admire, respect and envy how you've always telegraphed to your victims exactly what you're going to do them and how you're going to do it. So much so, that I've decided in the name of fair play to extend the same courtesy to you.
Please, feel free to influence the primary at your leisure. I wish you all the best. After that you're a dead man walking. Get your affairs in order. You will notbe here for the general.
3 4 l l k i 9 0 9 f i i v 0 0 - that's all you get.
That will rally them around Joe and those who have lost faith in Joe will jump to his defense ... it's like a ritual across the hall ... when they start to lose faith in Joe's predictions ... well then he manufactures these little death threats and they all jump to his defense ... it's beginning to get very boring.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
It is boring, but there is a certain sense of satisfaction knowing that...
...the sun will still rise tomorrow ...there will be a full moon every 28 days ...flowers will bloom in April
AND
...Joe's toadies will rush to his defense every time he manufactures a threat
Do you ever think that ANY of them question why Joe doesn't hand these threats over to the police???? Could it be that the threat IP address might not be different than, say, that of another Pilchesky computer? Hell, he has the freak'n email address of the "person" making the threat...this is something he requires to even register at DD.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 08:13, 2009-01-25
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 08:38, 2009-01-25
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
LOL What a jerk!! Tell me what exactly has he done that would push someone that far?? Who would bother to do it?
Doherty?...To his credit he has yet to even acknowledge the psycho's existence. Gatelli?.....she went the right pathshe is suing his fat bald ass. Cordaro?? lol kidding me?? He has, as he usually does, landed on his feet and is happy as a bug in a rug, besides he did it to himself. As Isaid before a monkey could havefiled and prevailed in that election situation.Shimkus?? Again are you kidding me??lol Joey you really need to come up with a new shtickthis one is pathetic.
Odd?? that is an understatement. If you read it carefully it implys that Joey has been receiving this kook's communications for awhile.
"You can try to find me if you like.You can trace the IP and the email that allowed me entry into this forum.Dead ends. You sent all of my letters to the FBI, didn't you?Dead ends"
Sort of narrows the list of suspects considering he only branched out into others in the last year, when he couldn't even land a glove on Doherty . So asI asked before....who could be bothered? It's not like he has been effective...annoying yes....obnoxious yes...racists yes... but effective??? Not so much lol lol
Real Threat If this is a valid threat that wasn't manufactured by Pilchesky himself, why then allow the post to stay up?
"Free Speech" - If Joe will not allow a post to stand that criticizes his motives or those of Janet Evans, removing the postings and banning the posters, it's pretty clear that the concept of "Free Speech" really doesn't apply at DD. Clearly, the "free speech" arugment holds no water here.
"Sympathy" - This is what you are left with, assuming the threat was real in the first place. Joe leaves these kinds of posting up because he likes the sympathy they envoke...even if they do, in fact, violate HIS OWN rules of conduct.
Manufactured Threat We've already beaten this one to death. Personally I think there's a better than 50/50 chance that Joe (or Edith) cooked this whole thing up. If there were letters, if those letters were actually sent by Pilchesky to the FBI and if Pilchesky was able to tie those letters to this person, the FBI could easily require the ISP (providing services to the "person" making the threat) to supply the identity of the person making the threat. Pilchesky also implies that this has been happening for a while, which makes it seem the more likely this is something Pilchesky created.
This isn't rocket science, and calling it "odd" is the understatement of the week.
Regarding Bob Cordaro...if a nuclear war were to happen tomorrow, in a years time only two forms of life would survive: roaches and Bob Cordaro (meaning...regardless of what happens, the man is a survivor).
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 12:03, 2009-01-25
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Note the "he-man" quaility of the picture...blazing guns ...young stud...talk about trying to relive your glory days... Joey you must be sorely lacking in the packing to need to emote like this......poor baby
Oh boy here is another one....better watch your step there little fella I hear Lou doesn't have much of a sense of humor when you are screwing around with his name, politically speaking of course. :)) But hey what do I know???..that's just what I have heard :)))
There can be no other plausible solution to Scranton's problems with this mayor than for Mr. DiBileo to run for city council. Knocking off Gatelli and joining the Evans ticket shuts Doherty out. Doherty would probably resign if he loses council majority.
Ewwwwwww He is talking to himself again ...seriously how creepy is this getting?
You might as well try taking down the Brooklyn Bridge with a nail file.
Joe, your goals are unachieveable. It's a valiant thing you want to do for the community, but in all seriousness, it's not happening. If all you're going to do is prove that the Scranton Times has protected the mayor then you're wasting your time. Everyone already knows that. Just my two cents.
Edith?? Is that you?? You actually will have two judges, darling, the BIG judge and the judge in Erie but the one in Erie will be in charge in March, darling
Look how far these two judges got before they were brought down. They probably ruined the lives of so many kids in the process. They made a mockery out of the justice system completely. Seven years isn't enough, even on a plea deal. It's hardly enough to make the public feel good about all that judicial abuse.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 16:39, 2009-01-26
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 18:38, 2009-01-26
Louie wants this now wrote:Joe, your goals are unachieveable. Gotcha ya'.
Well, better not throw any tea into the harbor, what point would that make, and give a holler over to Ghandi in India, tell him that one man cannot change an entire country.
Good for a belly laugh there Shadow. The mayor is probably laughing himself, but thinking if it could only be true. A lot of things have changed since this site showed up. Joe has been quite the pain in the ass. He's also been impossible for 'them' to get rid of. It's late in the gamefor empty threats that enterain more than intimidate. It takes all kinds.
Joey-jerkoff please for the love of God give it up. We know this is another one of your alter-egos. At this point your pathetic attempts at keeping this thread going is really starting to become hugely embarressing for you. OOOO poorjoey we are soo upset for you.... there??feel better?? let this go Joey you are starting to sound more unhinged than usual.
Does anyone out there know where one can get a bullet with a name engraved on it? I think Joe should have one for his fireplace mantle since the poster who threatened him might be too bashful about following up on his threat.
Pilchesky LOVES THE THOUGHT of being so controversial that someone would actually WANT to harm him. I'm telling you...he has this self-image of being Scranton's own Bufford Pusser. The reality is that far from wanting to harm him, the vast majority of Pilchesky's "opponents" ignore the hell out of him.
Being ignored...not made up threats...is what REALLY bothers Joe Pilchesky.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Give a little credit where it's due, they've got their thinking caps on.They're giving the people in housing projects the best screwing they've ever had in my humble opinion. Nothing is sacred around here. Nothing. I think we need to fill the courtroom on the day of the hearing. Fill er' up and make a statement.
The big question: who is going to make the final decision?
The bigger question: Who is going to fight this for those people?
No one in our political arena more deserves to be respected than Janet Evans. I read what Joe says here about all candidates. What he says about Pat Rogan is no shock to anyone. But, Joe is Joe. We all understand where he's coming from.He tries to open our eyes. Lots of things he says need to be said and sometimes if he doesn't say them, they don't get said. OK, he's a little more blunt but who doesn't like blunt?
He says the things most others are thinking and either will not say or cannot say. He says what needs to be said. It does not matter who is on the business end of it. He's made my jaw drop more times that I can count, but that's who he is.
My point is that I respect Joe so much for who he is. He's earned it. And that'swhy I respect Janet Evans. She's earned it. I trust what Joe says and I trust Janet Evans implicitly. If Janet comes out andasks for support for Pat Rogan and Frank Joyce, she's going to get it by the thousands.
Joe is trying to save out city by being a voice against corruption. But, his voice can't vote on council. Pat Rogan's and Frank Joyce's can. With Joe's voice out here and their voices in there with Janet, voting for the people, we're on the right track. Finally.
So filing over two dozen lawsuits (where you LOSE the vast majority) and costing the city over $45,000 in legal bills earns someone "respect"? Only in the bizzaro world of DD.
I swear they sound more retarded as the days progress.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't the object to vote Gatelli out?
Rogan doesn't do podium work because his youth goes on display as well as his inability to connect with homeowners and older voters.
This is a fact of life: Gatelli is sitting right there. If any candidate, from Rogan to Joyce to Charles to Hubbard wants a piece of her, there she is. Make your own way here. Any of those guys can be standing 20' away from both Gatelli and Fanucci. It's showtime. Who's going to show?
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Nahhhh he isn't...he has a whole rant over there about how he can't because of personal reasons he won't discuss. Of course everyone there is egging him on to, but I suspect that Danny-boy knows that he'd end up an enormous loser if he did. Think about it...what would qualify the man for the job? Failed Call Center Rep? House-husband? Professonal Apologizer?
How desparae have they become that they are looking at Hubbard as their savior?
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
RE: Frank Joyce and Pat Rogan for Scranton City Council..??? And when does the sewer authority get sliced up?
It's loaded with crony blood top to bottom. Joe posted the list of guys working there. Over 50 people added since Doherty became mayor and every one of them a friend of a relative or friend.
At least Dohert's shame is helping someone by giving them a job .... as opposed to ... lets say ... stealing over $100,000 from your dying father .... hmmmm .... yeah Doherty should be ashamed! And well Edith that was a truely honorable thiing you did ....Ripping off your father.
March is right around the corner!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Status: Online Posts: 6 Date: Feb 19 1:41 PM, 2009
I don't know though, a lot of people seem to still like Mayor Doherty, despite how much we would all like to see change. Most people don't look at the big picture and I can't tell you how many people I talk to think he is doing a great job and respond simply by saying, "Well look at how far the downtown has come since he has been mayor." If I had a nickel for every time someone said that to me.........
The Times Leader? You mean the 'other' Doherty paper?
What a total disappointment. Why do they even bother?
No journalistic backbone at all. Lots of issues but not guts to go after them.
I tell ya', where's a man of steel when you need him?
Joey-girl You don't even pay taxes from what I have heard never mind work!! Corp side???Hehehheh is this refering to the accounting work you and Edith did in reference to your late Father -in -law?? LOL LOL (my comments in red)
I work in the corporate side of life, the educated side of the coin, so to speak. If it were left to corporate management to decide who the next CEO will be of this city, there's no question it would be Gary DiBileo by a substantial margin. The last four years with Mr. Doherty have been an exercise of futility.
We're not even close to being on the map of recovery. We are, hawever, fundamentally speaking, on the map of humiliation and embarassment.
As far as the Times-Tribune is concerned, I don't think they're so blinded by their own arrogance that they'll go too far out on a limb for Mr. Doherty. He's a loser here, as are Mrs. Gatelli and Ms. Fanucci.
I agree with the "Statement Election" assessment. I believe it may be the last one we'll need for quite a while.
I can't believe that's the best Fanucci has to get re-elected. With all the problems facing this city, and with all the progress taking place, how does she get distracted with a person's tax bill?
I can guarantee all the senior citizens who heard Fanucci speak immediately felt a chill run down their spines, knowing that any delinquent tax bills they may have are now going to be broadcast every Tuesday night.
That's right, folks, Sherry Fanucci just restored your pride in the quality of people serving as public officials in Scranton.
Just keep pushing her buttons folks, it works for us everytime. For as many times as Doherty has taken a public criticism, he's kept his mouth shut. Smart, smart politician.
Joe P., the spinoffs of this are beyond imagination. The more I think of it the more I think I understand what you mean when you say the good Lord works in myterious ways. You can't make this stuff up.
Sherry has just become the conduit for all things nasty and mudslingish. Jeremy Burton has the energy and time to do a story on this issue but not the energy and time to do a story on many of the lawsuits Joe has against the city?
Burton reads this site religiously. He knows all about the disgusting poolhouse and Joe's lawsuit trying to get it straightened out. Where's that story? Scumbag.