Posts: 3627 Date: Nov 13 8:19 PM, 2008 Atty. Hinton and Judge Hatchet Thomson jerk each other off over Complex fraud Timothy Hinton is a lawyer. He represents Da U and the Times all of the time. I like Tim. Tim is very funny and entertainingas opposed to drabby Carl Greco who is as entertaining as watching paint dry. Tim is crawling the walls over my legal actions involving the Complex deal. For three years now he couldn't seal the deal to get rid of me, which I what makes him so funny in court. He's got the Dennis the Menace thing going for starters, so when he starts talking and if I'm looking at him, not even he can keep a straight face.
A little while back Mazzoni gave me a really good screwing before he jumped the dangerous S.S. Complex for safer political shores. Thanx for that, Bob. That forced me to file lots of paperwork to fix it, which I did. Meanwhile, the separate lawsuit againstDa U was coming up for argument and my brief was due. However, the paperwork had to be fixed beforeDa U argumentcould be heard, so I didn't file the brief with the intention of withdrawing Da U lawsuit because Da u has to be included with the lawsuit against the SRA, by law,which was what Mazzoni refused to allow, among other things.
Now, Timmy boy knew I had to fix the paperwork or I really was cooked. He also knew that when I failed to filemy brief he could ask the court to dismiss my lawsuit. That's legal and fair game. I expected him to do that and he did it on October 19th with argument set for October 25th before Judge Hatchet Thomson. Well, I knew Hatchet Thomson would whack me for sure, so on the 23rd I simply withdrew the complaint with a full explanation included. Lawyers do that all the time.The hearing was then cancelled, as it should have been.
Then, I got a notice from Ron Mackay, court admin., that a new date was set to argue Timmy's Motion to Dismiss.Now, the rules do provide that a judge can stop a party from withdrawing under certain circumstances, but a special petition has to be filed. Timmy never filed such a petition, so his Motion to Dismiss was defective all the way. In my answer to Tim'smotion, I pointed out the defects to Judge Hatchet Thomson. Meant nothing. They held a hearing without me and Judge Hatchet gave me the hatchet. No explanation,the usual for this crony sack of sh!t. Here's his Order.The words "with prejudice" means I can't file a new lawsuit. All based on not filing a brief? Unheard of. Back to Harrisburg now to embarrass another lawyer and another judge. First, I have to stroke Judge Hatchet a little by asking him nicely to reconsider. Motion to Reconsider based upon fact that YOU DON'T KNOW THE FVCKING LAW. And they wonder why people take the law into their own hands?
Translation:
He Lost, Again.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 06:55, 2008-11-14
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Amazing how he needs four paragraphs to blame everyone but himself for his loss. Crony Judges...yeah, that's right Joe...you keep telling yourself that and everything will be alright.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
It's like watching one of those original martial arts movies from the 1960's. The sensei's lips move for a minute and a half and the translation to English is: "HA, take THAT, son of a goat farmer"
You sure do know how to give me a laugh in the mornings Girl ... that was a perfect comment to add to this discussion ... How the hell do you come up with this stuff so early in the morning???
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.