I agree with everything he says in this post. Yet, the law and the constitution (sort of) say something completely different. This post by Joe is proof of why he can not be considered a "source of news." Joe is simply a guy with an opinion. His followers forget that. Imagine Joe trying to differentiate between news coverage and the editorial page. He can't do it.
Gun incident at Old Country Buffet leaves lots of questions A few days ago, several people walked into the Old Country Buffet in Dickson City openly carrying weapons,various kinds of pistolsin particular. From what I can gather, there was actually a group of them celebrating their right to openly carry firearms. Police were called and the incident led to some of those people being removed from the establishment, and having their guns removed, because they didn't have their permits with them. They later returned to the restaurant.
My only question, aside from the fact that the law provides that a person with a permit may carry a gun in the open, at least from what I understand of the gun laws, is why would anyone want to walk into a family restaurant on Mother's Day with a gun exposed? Allowed or not, my view of that is that it's poor judgment. Are the kids in the place not supposed to be intimidated by the sight of a group of men carrying guns openly? It's a guy thing, apparently, that lends itself to how some men think when their identities are suffering from some other form of abandonement. No toys as kids? I don't know, but grouping together with guns showing, and entering a family restaurant is way beyond acceptable conduct for any normal man, and I stress the word normal.
I'm all for the right to bear arms, but for the immature men out there who don't know any better, I can guarantee you that you can certainly have breakfast in this country without feeling threatened by people eating bacon and eggs.
-- Edited by Art Gordon at 20:24, 2008-05-16
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 09:20, 2008-05-23
I always find it amazing how Pilchesky attracts this odd assortment of the weak-minded...
...people that require Joe's leadership ...people that like to throw stones but cry like little girls when someone throws one back at them ...people that whore out their own principles (FOP Officer Nelson) just to "belong" ...people who allow racist pigs like Anti to call them inbred without batting an eye (can you say "Thank You Sir, May I Have Another?") ...people who crow about Free Speech but then cheer Joe's banning of people who are guilty of exercising Free Speech
Yupp....quite the weak-minded crew.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Is this another Hollowgate? Todd Hartmangate??? In the wind:last Thurdsay, on the 24th of April,did the City of Scranton's tree cutting crew appear at 1207 Moltke Ave. andmake quick work of two trees in the front yard? Three trucks and 9 workers total. My source says yes. I visited 1207 Moltke Ave. and found what appears to be two fresh tree stumps in the front yard with a white SSA pickup truck parkedacross the street.1207 Moltke Ave. happens to be where School Director Todd Hartman lives, and he does, in fact, workfor the SSA. I didn't witness the tree cutting, or when it occurred, or who did it, but my source adamantly stands by his claim that the trees were taken down last Thursday and that the city did the work. I put a call into Director Brazil's Office, but no return call yet.
The first picture shows two stumps divided by some greenery, but were they done by a private contractor or is this a repeat of Hollowgate?
Rose Novembrino has come through again. Recently I requested that she investigate the tree cutting at School Director Todd Hartman's home by the DPW, as well as why the DPW was removing Xmas lights for the Chamber of Commerce building. Here is her answer to my requests, which includes a pic of Hartman's home illustrating the location of a telephone pole in his yard that apparently establishes where the right-of-way is. Unfortunately, the colorful picture did not scan well, so you don't see much. Perhaps my wife can get it scanned in better when she returns.The picture at leastshows that Brazil took the time to look into it and provide a response.
A big thanks to Rose and her investigative powers.
So basically nothing was done wrong, however Mr Hartman and his family were subjected to this entire debacle for what? Because Joey the big pussy doesn't have the balls to just confront anyone directly, he needs to hurl internet 'bombs" (figuratively speaking) from a distance. How about for a change you get the facts about a issue before you hurl!!...Joey you are an idiot!
Hey Joe you Pussy nice try!! I thought you claimed you would put all the public officials addresses (including pictures of their homes so we can all see how well they live) on your main webpage?? Remember?? (I found the post have posted it) You even said to be fair you would put up your own house as well. So what is this all about?? It's about the fact you are a pussy!!You know you would have your ass good and spanked if you even attempted to do this with a Federal Judge. You may get away around here with your assine antics, but just try it with a federal judge and see what happens. Pussy!! Inappropriate my ass... scared sh!tless is more like it.
One question, Where do the Federal Judge that would oversee any case that Mr. MCDowell if charged for any vioalations concerning the Single Tax Office reside.
I understand your point, buta judge's address will not result in that judge disqualifying himself. It would be inappropriate to list the address of any judge, in my opinion.
Not listing your phone number or address in the phone book does not insulate anyone from having their address published anywhere. Furthermore, I'm working on a page on the main site that will list the addresses of as many public officials and cronys as possible along with a picture of their home and the vehicles they drive to show the good taxpayers how well they're living off them. Wait'll you see how many live up on the 1600 and 1700 of N.Washington. In all fairness, I'll posta picture of my own house.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 09:42, 2008-05-26
Good then we shouldn't have any disagreement on this subject.
There is no disagreement. No one has placed a minor into the 'spotlight", so to speak. A question was asked whether the female arrestedwas related to any of the political Brazils, nothing more.
Any person can grow up to be in politics so I guess that would mean all of our kids are fair game.
All of "our" kids are not groomed for political service. If you think that does not happen, you're politically naive. Just like Little Baseball is a feeder system for the higher levels, so the children of political families are the feeder system for political futureservice.Not all of them, but enough, just as are the Lynett children are properly groomed for the paper industry, which is very smart for reasons too numerous to mention. The political machine in any city would stall where political familiesstop investing in the future, which invariably,is the children.
Perhaps I am wrong but since it is your policy (see statement 1 above) to stay off children shouldn't we verify a person isnot a minor before we go public with any information about them? It seems to me that it would be the right thing to do. Afterall you can not unring a bell.
Agreed, but there is no way for me to instantly know who is a minor and who is not. Many names are posted here. Besides, no specific person has been attached to the arrest, so that's where it lies. I happen to know the first name, but I don't know if she is a minor or not. If she is not, you'll be the first to know. Bell ringing fails the legal system under controlled circumstances, but not here. We unring the bell all the time. Corrections to statements made here happen all the time, to the harm of no one, i.e., someone once posted that I was a really good guy. Nothing is further from the truth. I'm really a bad guy doing a good thing because it involves exposing other bad guys who abuse the public trust. Somehow, in my mind, that makes sense. It's an "It takes a thief" applicationof justice.
Someone name an example where someone at DD was slandered and "the bell was un-rung". Glenn, has that happened yet to Attorney Joe T.? Perhaps Warden Donato?
As for Joe being a "bad guy doing good", I'm 1000% convinced that what Pilchesky does has more to do with self-gratification than any sense of enhancing the pulbic trust. There's a word that describes doing something solely for self-gratification: Masterbation.
Bottom Line: Pilchesky has been owned by DD poster IWasJustThinking.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 06:43, 2008-05-27
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
So here is the question then ... how long before Joe bans this poster? The ones that question Joe don't last long over there.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
An to my knowledge ... I have never seen them "unring the bell" ... they say what they want ... about whom they want ... whenever they want and ... and proof of what they say is rarely provided.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Ah Joe? The US Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, would have a problem with any employer making clerks salary/expempt. I'm thinking that what you wrote is not only wrong, but just plain stupid.
I completely understand what it is you are saying, however the question has been skirted here. Are they going to receive pay for the five extra hours that they will be working each week? Or will they receive no compensation?
Mathematically speaking, they got a 2% raise in pay, but must work 5 hours more. Apparently, they are salary, so there is no compensation for the additional 5 hours, as is the case with an salary person who works longer hours than scheduled.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I know for a fact that they are being compensated for the extra hours worked ... I have it from a very reliable source ... because she works at city hall and is a DD poster and does not want Joey to know that she talks to me ... I have to respect that!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
...she works at city hall and is a DD poster and does not want Joey to know that she talks to me ... I have to respect that!
No offense, but.......why?
Who is Joe to say who she can and can't talk to? I don't know your friend, so it's nothing personal, but how do you respect that sort of....fear's not the right word but I can't think of the right one...subjugation? So Joe knows she talks to you. Big f-ing deal. What does she think he's going to do about it? Deny her freedom of speech? Burn down her house? Have her deported? That's the exact sort of cult mentality that loon feeds on.
I seriously just don't get that statement at all; "she doesn't want Joe to know she talks to me." I mean no disrespect, but that's just dumb. I'm sorry.
Don't be sorry ... as I won't be sorry for making the "dumb" statement ... because what do we have here that they do not have at DD .... Freedom of speech and the right to our own opinions ... you don't have to like what I say ... that's ok ... and I'm not going to apologize for saying it!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
::: ... What does she think he's going to do about it? Deny her freedom of speech? ... :::
She probably has a founded fear of an "any dirt on ..." thread with her name in it. Either that or the possible retaliation from co-workers who pander to pilcheski. It's been known to happen.
His Girl Thursday wrote:possible retaliation from co-workers who pander to pilcheski. It's been known to happen.
Yeah, and we're the one's drinking kool-aid. Pilchesky's the biggest idiot in town. Plain and simple. Anyone who's intimidated or influenced by that prick is just a pathetic loser, and not worthy of any sort of respect from me--Sam Patilla being the exception, world class linguist and all.
I have asked this before and I am asking again. If you tards at DD are going to post under multiply names could you at least try to change your style a bit so it might go unnoticed? I mean really!! Joey-boy you idiot.. I think "your slip is showing" as well. Nice try Joey-boy but as usual you are busted!! :)) Good Lord, tell me that isn't vintage Joey-boy to a word. I wonder if he knows how many people are laughing their butts off at the stupidy at that site.
Union buster, you're lucky these communications are done over the net and not in person. Walk into city hall and make those statements directly to Nancy or Patti and see if you leave with your balls still in tact. Your face would probably look likea road map carved with nails and your tongue would be used for all that it's worth - to clean the counters. Women are not always spontaneous creatures when it comes to revenge. This vindictive, evil man we are insulted to call a mayor will pay for this act of backstabbing. If he doesn't know that, he's as stupid as your dick is probably short, stubby and unused.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 09:48, 2008-06-01
That Joe Pilchesky has an answer for everything! He is a Carpenter, Lawyer, Internet Guru, Constitution Expert, Political Activist, and sees the future. How lucky is the city of Scranton to have the Leonardo DaVinci of the mentally challenged as a resident! Now who says there is not a Scranton Renassaince.
Puzzler...you forgot 'Star Athelete', 'Lover', 'Writer' and 'Liberator of Small Fish*'
The truly telling part is that by most prudent-person measures, he seems to suck at most things he does, with the possible exception of the carpentry business (which I will give him the benefit of the doubt about). It just proves once again that no matter how unqualified or bizzare the messenger, there is always someone around stupid enough to believe the message. Afterall, Germany in the 1930's elected a failed art student Chancellor, so by that standard, Pilchesky could have his eye on Pope one day.
(*) In case you never saw this, the fish thing actually comes from a "I love Joe" thread a few months ago, where someone claimed...I think it was Edith...that Joe once bought a whole bunch of small fish and then set them free into the river. Honest...you can't make crap like this up.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 18:30, 2008-06-01
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
(*) In case you never saw this, the fish thing actually comes from a "I love Joe" thread a few months ago, where someone claimed...I think it was Edith...that Joe once bought a whole bunch of small fish and then set them free into the river. Honest...you can't make crap like this up.
It was Edith. It was scary. I am still laughing my ass off about it.
I remember the one about the small kid who apparently referred to joe as a 'neat guy' (or something of the sort) and sent joe some cash - probably a fistful of change from his lemonade stand. Awww, joe's just a helluva guy. Joanne should feel honored that fistful of change will be earmarked for the quality of legal experience she'll be receiving if her old man represents her in Erie.
Lus, I don't want you to feel left out. I'll send you all the change I find in my couch. How's that?
That's so nice of you Girl ... and I thank you ... however I stay on the right side of the law ... I do not file frivilous lawsuits ... so therefore I don't see myself needing to save pennies in order to pay for my legal defense.
However ... if that process server ever does show up (waiting well over a year now) to serve me the papers for the 3 promised Pilchesky v. LusOnlyVoice lawsuit I may have a change of heart (pun intended) ... LOL
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
This post is coming from a carpenter who beat a sleeping drunk with a tire iron who now fights his battles against women with a crude internet site whose wife stole money from her dying father! Joe you are a true brave man and I'll let you in on a secret: Beside the bottom feeders and your trolls, EVERYONE IS LAUGHING AT YOU!
Elliot: (at afternoon roll call) "Because you all cried to Bill Courtright and Janet Evans, I'm going to turn your world upside down within the next two weeks and take whatever action is necessary." Another screw has come loose from Elliot's already shaky emotional foundation.
Tough words from a fat bag of wind who gets told where to get off by rookies on the job less than a year. It's totally impossible to stand toe-to-toe withRay Hayesand not laugh. I could never do it. I doubt any of the cops could do it. However, if you got in a toe-to-toe with Elliot, how could you resist trying to burb him? It's likeFrancis Renda saying he's going to kick your ass.It's just a no-go.