I know we had a Hello Pot thread in the past ... but I am lazy and don't want to dig it up ... also I don't want anyone to have to sift through the stuff thats in it from the past ....
I was across the hall this morning and I came across this little gem ... thought that it was quite funny and there could be a brand new "Hello Pot" thread from this ...
I have to comment on the Times Rag running a front page picture of a wife crying after just seeing her husband struck and killed on his motorcyle. We don't need to see that and the family certainly doesn't need to open the paper and see that. It was cruel, insensitive, and unnecessary to show that picture.(and this is what gave me that Hello Pot moment .... I guess they would recognize "insensitive and unnecessay more than any of us as the practice these two qualities on a daily basis) The media is disgusting.
That trash only cares about selling the garbage. If shock value sells, they will try to shock us.(and again do any of you remember that saying ... Takes one to know one ... don't the goons and Pappa Pilchesky try to shock and entire city on a daily basis???)
Now what I find funny about this is that they are accusing the TT of printing things on the front page that could be distrubing to people ... they put things up daily that are disturbing and don't think twice about it ...
How about when DD spoke of the suicide of a City Worker at Christmas ... I guess that was not done for Shock Value .... yeah right! There are many many more examples .... so many that I can't list them all ... don't have the time it would take!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Wait a minute...wait a minute. This coming from the freaks, when their ballless leader stands around snapping pictures at local tragedies? Not helping... noooooo.... taking pictures. Please!
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 07:21, 2008-04-29
It seems to me the Times was just exercising their rights to free speech. That's ok, isn't it?
Sure, the Times putting a picture of a crying widow out there for all to see may be construed as inconsiderate and tacky. But this finger-pointing coming from the upstanding citizens across the hall who drag people through the mud on a daily basis and think nothing of it? Please...
I don't think IHave meant to allude to "hate" -- it seems to me "disgust" is more the correct term. Did joe stop snapping the InstaMatic to help on Acker Avenue? Umm, no. Just kept on snapping and pointed fingers at the people who were actually doing their jobs.
Or did he offer to help when the Scanlon's building was ablaze? I only remember the snapping polaroid and (again) the finger pointing at people who were offering a helping hand and grasping at straws about "who" and "why". Oh, and then he passed the camera along to the next guy so he could go home to start the posting furor.
Does he stop to think about the lives of the spouses and children he is ruining when he starts his "any information on ..." topics? No.
No, Glenn, I think the term you're looking for is "disgust".
So...because Joe does something it automatically becomes acceptable for those on this board to stoop down to infantile name-calling? Not mere insults, mind you. Name-calling.
Did I call anyone a fat whore? They did at dd. Did I call anyone a philandering wife beater? They did at dd. Did I call anyone a flaming queer? They did at dd. Did I call anyone a crony blowjob? They did at dd. Did I call anyone a n*****? They did at dd. Did I call anyone a limp dick? They did at dd. Did I call anyone a walking ****bag? They did at dd. Did I accuse anyone of being a murderer? They did at dd. Did I accuse anyone of being responsible for a christmas suicide? They did at dd.
I'm here only to point my finger and laugh at the dd'ers. I'll be the first to admit that - and yes, I am "Quilty" of a few names being called, but not maliciously and never with the intent to ruin someone's reputation as they do across the hall.
So don't talk to me about my petty name calling when the antics across the hall are so much worse than my Miss Clairol and Granny comments.
Glenn Cashuric wrote: This coming from the freaks, when their ballless leader stands around snapping pictures at local tragedies? Nope...no hate at all in that comment.
GC
Hate?? No total shock and amazement not to mention disgust, but most of all correctly used descriptive language in my most humble opinion. Lets not forget the context in which I was reacting shall we?? I was reacting (through my comments) to the freaks* across the hall criticizing the Times a NEWSPAPER....you know where they report news.....for having a picture of a current, albeit tragic, NEWS event. I was merely pointing out their ball-less** leader takes and posts pictures for general consumption on a website every bit as controversial. However, he is not engaging in reporting news, not by a long shot. He is actually attempting to engage in the creation of news, all the while never lifting a finger to help the people who are in the pictures. This is not exactly someone I would want to be defending. It seems passing odd to me that you are, Glen, but hey each to their own opinion.
*yes a name I call the people across the hall. I suggest you try reading the definition of freak below and then tell me I am completely wrong in my application of the word.
freak1Audio Help (frk) Pronunciation Key n. 1.A thing or occurrence that is markedly unusual or irregular: A freak of nature produced the midsummer snow.2.An abnormally formed organism, especially a person or animal regarded as a curiosity or monstrosity. 3.A sudden capricious turn of mind; a whim: "The freaks of the psyche can no more be explained than the Devil"(Maurice Collis).4.Slanga.A drug user or addict: a speed freak.b.An eccentric or nonconformist person, especially a member of a counterculture. c.An enthusiast: rock music freaks. adj.Highly unusual or irregular: a freak accident; a freak storm.
intr. & tr.v. freaked, freaking, freaksSlang
1.To experience or cause to experience frightening hallucinations or feelings of paranoia, especially as a result of taking a drug. Often used with out.2.To behave or cause to behave irrationally and uncontrollably. Often used with out.3.To become or cause to become greatly excited or upset. Often used with out.
**Where I come from any man who allows others to engage in or who personally engages in the activity of picking on children is a coward and a heel.So ball-less (lack of courage) seems mighty accurate to me.
I decided to edit my postto add this oldie but goodie in for a visual aid. This is the man you are defending Glen.
Remember this post dear? Naturally my comments are much much worse than the below post right?
I can see where you are coming from Glen, the moral equivalence between my post and Joey-boy is quite obvious now. I was so blind until you showed me the error of my ways. Thank you, sensei.
RE: Commishoners Race Done Now Time To Take Over School Board
StorminCarmen wrote:
Mark my words and then next in the crosshairs will be Mr. Pilchesky. We have a special front page salute ready for him.
I hope you didn't get wind of the lawsuit I plan to file against Minora and Munley for rigging an election. I really thought I was keeping that under tabs. Maybe that special little something I have in my back pocket about STacy "free with his hands" Brown? Who gives a damn, the people don't believe what the lowly Times prints anyway. If they printed I was a serial rapist, I'd end up invited to more parties by the Jesuits up at Chapman Lake, where the boy-lovers meet every Saturday night for their ritualistic gay romp down to the waters edge where midnight boat rides are the real Moonlight Special for the locals.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 07:55, 2008-04-30
So...because Joe does something it automatically becomes acceptable for those on this board to stoop down to infantile name-calling? Not mere insults, mind you. Name-calling.
GC
Well, I see this really opened up quite the discussion ... Glenn just a question ... do you criticize the kids across the hall when they call someone a name? Or ... are you reserving your criticisms for the PD posters alone? I have not participated in this thread other than to make the original post ... I think it's pretty damn hypocritical of the Kids across the hall to lay shame on the TT when they themselves are "quilty" of doing the same exact thing themselves.
If you truly did care about the way people feel you would say the same things to the DD posters who called Judy Gatelli a Nazi ... do you remember that ... what about the terrible things that they say on a daily basis ... rumor mongering ... posting things that they have absolutely no proof of ... every damn day ... Anti ... calling me an inbred that's not an insult .... that's name calling ... plain and simple ... and yes I feel he calls me that as I am Irish ... he is talking about me. I am not insulted I am highly offended daily by the racist rants of this particular poster!!!!
You defend them all you want Glenn as that is your right (that's what a lawyer does I guess)... but remember that most (not all) of the posters here tried to do what we are doing ... giving our opinion ... our first hand knowledge of a situation ... to them on the DD site ... but when what we had to say contradicted what they wanted to believe they would first go on the attack and call us names ... then assume that we must be a DOobie ... and then (in my case) I was banned when I would not conform to the DD way of thinking ... I received an email telling me that when I changed the way that I look at things (from Pappa Pilchesky) another words think the way that they think, I would then be allowed to be a member again and have posting rights. So much for the freedom of speech for all ... where are my rights?
I am not going to sit here and tell you that I don't hate that site ... yes I hate that site ... do I hate Pappa P. and the rest of the goons ... no ... I have no respect for them ... but I would not call it hate. I hate what they do ... I do not hate them as I do not know them personally (most anyway) and in my opinion they are not worth the energy that I would have to waste hating them. Am I going tocontinue to call them a name or two ... you bet I am ... if they stop calling everyone names then I will stop ... but until then let them know how it feels (they don't like it much ... it shows in some of the posts).
You Glenn ask us to hold ourselves to a higher standard ... I don't see you asking this of them ... can I now ask you why you feel you have a right to tell us we are wrong all of the time ,... but yet you don't say this to them? I am curious about this.
We are afterall only human ... not one of us is perfect! Nor have we ever claimed to be perfect!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
::: ... I now ask you why you feel you have a right to tell us we are wrong all of the time ,... but yet you don't say this to them? I am curious about this. ... :::
It's because joe will boot his arse to the curb if he voices an opinion adverse to those of the upstanding citizens across the hall.
(not meant to speak for Glenn, stricly MY opinion)
I make my 14 year-old daughter watch council to observe Fanucci in action. I tell here, "That's what you'll sound like if you don't do your homework and don't go to college." It's working like a charm. She got the point.
Would it be best for your 14 Year Old to read the posts in this same topic?
This is what I heard about Jr. Council and Miller's attempt at powermongering.
Somehow it was offered (or asked for) that the political science students at the U of S could sit on jr. council. Miller lobbied for a no-go, and as you can see, it didn't happen. However, I believe Miller will be a freshman at the U in Sept., and I heard through the grapevine that he will then approach city council asking that the U students be allowed to join jr. council.
Dougie is a spoiled little brat. Period. The best part of him ran down his daggy's leg and stained the mattress.
The way Bob Bolus and Doug rigged the election was absolutely masterful.
Freedom of Speech = ability to post vulgarity about a high school student!
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
This little jewel was posted across the hall in reply to an Electric City tongue-in-cheek article from the ever-irreverent Rude Rube Lomax about the Prutusto-Andrews nuptials.
Let us just substitute the phrase 'crony blowjobLomax' with the phrase 'jackass extrordinairepilcheski'.
Just the thought that so many Americans diedso that this crony blowjob Lomax could be free to think out loud is disturbing. Some list of guests that attendedGabrielle's emotional death march down the isle with Frank Shimkus. 450 guests? - my source says it was more like 135 tops. No top shelf dems in sight.To answer the question as to whether or not Frank is hung, that answer is yes. Totally hung, as he heads for the most humiliating defeat imaginable in November.
You do nice work, Rube. Shame you're not double-jointed.
And as for that last line (speaking entirely for myself and not Rude Rube)... backatcha, you disgusting little man.
"To answer the question as to whether or not Frank is hung, that answer is yes. Totally hung..."
Maybe Joe is really gay. I can think of no other explanation for that observation. And maybe Joann's looking forward to her prison stint, since then perhaps she'll finally get the attention that apparently so repulses Joe.
Congratulations on throwing your closet door wide open, fruitcake.
Ya he does seem extraordinarily interested in the sex lives of other men doesn't he? Hummmmmm. He also seems to like to lurk around watching them and taking pictures. Very interesting.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 22:05, 2008-05-09
This underage blanket policy is fair and honorable. Example Chelsea Clinton was underage and dancing on the tables in VailColo. drunk,Nothing reported. Chelsea was underage and it was reported in the European press she used to be carried out of the bars like a teapot. The policy of the US press children are off limits. Jenna Bush tried to buy a ****tail with a phony ID, a few months before her 21 birthday, in the press for months. A full children offlimits is fair.
Doherty is far from presidential. Also, there is a world of difference between underage drinking and resisting arrest. Like dad, lil Doherty has nothing but contempt for the law and has to rely on speaking Galeic and doing the Irish jig in court to get him self off the hook. Must be nice to be a lad in ICN-ville.
And who would know more about having contempt for the law than our favorite racist pig Anti .... HELLO POT!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
He's nothing more or less than a spoiled little "attention whore" who's running out of things to do to get attention. He's been used and abused by the Bolus/Gatelli brainiacs and he has no moral compass to follow, so he struggles at getting attention by making a bigger ass out of himself than we believed possible.
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
sarge115b Posts: 794 Date: Jun 1 1:04 AM, 2008 Views: 456 The only thing the TT has to do with freedom of speech is to debase the term. What emanates from them is highly censored, self serving, distortions of the facts. Just notice how they take a persons freely spoken words then twist them. When the interviewed reads them, he has to scramble around tell everyone that's not what he said. I would term it constitutional right to lie.
Funny, but isn't "Mr Freedom of Speech" Joe Pilchesky FAMOUS for censoring posters on his own message board? In fact, we think that two recent decenting posters (IWasJustThinking and Mor R.) were banned for expressing opinions that run counter to Pilchesky & is lap-dogs Patilla and Anti. So tell me, which is more "highly censored, self-serving and distortions of the facts", DD or the Scranton Times?
What a bunch of tools.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
You are right acitizen, it would have been in far better taste and benefit all involved if Edith and Danny Hubard were the one taking the pictures and then posting them on their website without any permission
On a side note. Did anyone happen to check the Scranton times website today. They had a picture of the girl hanging from the side of the bridge. I can understand about reporting on the store, but I believe it was in rather poor taste to take a picture of the girl hanging from the bridge. I bet she probably had enough problems to go to the bridge, I believe the picture just adds to it.
Perfect DD Hello Pot moment ... don't you know that it's on the Pilchesky's and Hubbard that are allowed to take photos that might embarass someone and post them on the www for the world to see ... that's ok .... perfect example of hypocracy at its very finest!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
it didn't take long. Editingwas an issue that concerned everyone as 61 changed hands. This has serious overtones. Who decided what should have been edited? The meetings should be shown live and whole, no editing. Editing is censorship, plain and simple. This type of editing will lead to a federal action sooner than later since it's foreclosingupon our constitutional rights. It's all bad for Doherty if thisis his idea of DohertyTV.
Oh noooooo another thing that is going to be "bad" for doherty.....wow at the rate Joey is going with bring all the "bad" stuff to doherty's table Joey may actually run this guy out of office in .........10 years hahahhahahaehahah
This is coming from a man who runs his own derogatory and offensive website that includes racist remarks, disgusting photo shop shadow cartoons, gross sexual innuendo, etc etc all so he can be blow his own horn as some sort of corruption fighter. How dare people take away newspaper space when it could be used to cover another one of Joe P's court losses!
Bitter Pill please inform me then if wedding announcements, engagements, and anniversaries are shallow then what do you call what your idol Joe P does on his public website?
Sign of the times??? A lot of interesting connections can be made by reading the "People" section of the Times every Sunday. That's where they blow their horn publicly in terms of pics and "look where I am".
It's a good idea. Keep the thread rolling along, it could be interesting if posters read the People section and start connecting political dots. I save every copy.
RE: Sign of the times??? (A look at the "People " section of the Sunday Times) They sure do love to show off. They will get noticed if it's the last thing they do! How very shallow.
__________________ "Along habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right ". Thomas Paine