That's not Dan's first loss in court, although the others were pretty minor traffic violations and a plea of disorderly conduct for an incident in which he recieved 4 citations. Yep, real Boy Scout the LGNA has representing them.
Any good community activist worth their salt has a lengthy rap sheet, though. I imagine it will get longer once Daron is finished with him.
Ahhhhh, so Danny isn't quite the innocent community activist he claims to be? I should have checked the court site. Oh well; I'm sure mom has helped with the fines over the years.
As for Daron, I have three words of advice for Danny:
"ASSUME THE POSITION"
(Maybe as part of any deal, Danny will have to say "Thank you Sir, may I have another?")
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 07:37, 2008-03-28
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
RE: How did Dan Hubbard make out in court yesterday? Mr. Hubbard needs to appeal this decision for the following reasons:
1. There were other witnesses who were not aware of the hearing date because he didn't keep us properly informed of it (others are willing to appear on his behalf);
Who are you more mad at, Joe? Dan, for showing up so pathetically unprepared, despite your flawless mentoring, or the bottom feeders, for not showing up in the first place? I'm also not buying the excuse that you all weren't "properly informed" of the date. Doherty drops a deuce and you losers know the consistency, smell, and taste of it. It simply "does not pass the sniff test" that you are all so in the dark about your boy's hearing date.
....Wait, yes it does...
Just pay the fine for him already and stop wasting all of our time. Besides, you can't deny us the lengthy spin about how he was given the shaft, just like your plea bargaining buddy.
How long are you planning on dragging Joann's imminent guilty verdict through the courts? Just so we're all prepared and have enough popcorn on hand.
Oh no, Anti is mad that Danny-Boy lost. I guess the jury was stacked with Irishmen, huh?
As for the officer that Anti trashes, I'll look for FOP President Stulgis to come to her defense. Oh wait, I forgot; AnnMarie only comes to the defense of officers slighted by Mayor Doherty.
shhhh ... we were not supposed to confirm that AG ..... LOL
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
RE: How did Dan Hubbard make out in court yesterday? I heard the cop was pissed at him anyway because Dan was sitting on the floor at council and he had to ask him to move.
Anyway, I could see what they want Dan shut down. He's probably the most viable candidate for the next election, a people's candidate, and lord knows candidates like that don't go too far in this town.
Candidate for what? The scarcastic, whiney Danny may sound "cool" at council meetings to his mom and elicit ^5's from Newark's favorite son (next to Sharpe James) Sammy P, but it doesn't fly when you actually have to talk about where you stand on issues. Actually I do hope Danny runs for an elected office, if only so that I can relish his crushing defeat at the hands of any opponent...animal or human...live or dead.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 21:02, 2008-03-31
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Most of the legion of doom speakers at council I rather enjoy watching. They may be "out there" butsome are harmless and entertaining. An example of this would be Les. He kind of seems like a nice guy all things considered, but is a little confused.
However some people just get me absolutely fired up when they speak. I flat out CANT STAND to watch them. At the top of this list is FAY and Hubbard. Hubbard just reminds me of the mammas boy of the neighborhood, that had no friends and was always crying and whining about everything. Mommy was always there to protect himand givehim what he wanted, whether he was right or not. And now he's trying to make the city take care of HIS problems. And to top it all off he comes across as very smug and holier than thou.
He posts on other message boards and writes the same way he speaks...as you noted smug and holier than thou. He has never posted here to the best of my knowledge, probably because he knows that we wouldn't simply accept his BS (although you are welcome here Danny).
Anyone know what Mr Smug does for a living? I'm always facinated by people who claim to be "all that" but then when you pull back the covers you discover that they aren't.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Actually I do hope Danny runs for an elected office, if only so that I can relish his crushing defeat at the hands of any opponent...animal or human...live or dead.You mean more crushing than the fact that he couldn't even secure enough support to win his own party's nomination in an otherwise uncontested primary race for City Controller? The one in which he couldn't garner more write in votes on the Republican side than a Democrat? The one in which his 53 write-ins fell well short of the minimum requirement to even be listed on the ballot in the general election? Yeah. He's a viable candidate.
Viable candidates do not finish second in an uncontested race. Seriously, NO ONE WAS EVEN RUNNING AGAINST HIM and he still couldn't win the nod.
Anyone know what Mr Smug does for a living? Staff photographer, DohertyDeceit.com. Otherwise, nothing.
He has the rainy day rights to standing in front of his house hollering "whoop whoop whoop" over and over again when the drizzle turns into a downpour. I can hear him from my office.
i could be wrong, but apparently he's home all day. i remember that he stated he's Mr. Mom. wife holds the job and it seems that while the kids are in school, he runs around and takes pictures. LOL. WOW, house for nothing, wife is the one who works. still can't understand what there is to complain about. his neighbors have a bit to complain about however, since now that the weather is nice he and the kids will be running the quad around the neighborhood streets illegally.
RE: Doherty and Cordaro are working together on a new Stadium Plan Flipsy wrote: Please explain to me why a stadium would be bad for the city? Higher property values, get rid of some filthy section in SS, WS, or GR?
Please explain to me which area of Greenridge you would consider filthy? How would this raise property values??? Who would want to live by a stadium? Have you ever seen a parking lot during and after a game or show of any kind? Why would anyone want that in their backyard, not to mention what part of this city has the infastruture to handle that kind of traffic without throwing the city into a nightmarish traffic jam that we see at the mountain now. Please again I ask what part of Greenridge to you consider filthy???? Be honest its obvious who I am so you can hide behind your screen name, go a head sit ther and hide but tell me what part?
Now does anyone think for one second that they would build this stadium in Danny's back yard ... I don't ... but this might get the siren installed ... just a thought!
Oh Danny I thought you didn't have time for the DD bull$hit .... at least that's what you said on the City Data Forum ... guess you lied huh? Somehow that does not surprise me ....
Hell you are the heir apparent for DD so I guess you will be filing a lawsuit ... right?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Not to defend Dan, but that thread started over a year ago, ran out of steam, and was resurrected over 4 months later. It ran its course again shortly thereafter until it was brought up again after an 8 month hibernation. That was not a recent Hubbard post.
Worth noting, however, is that everyone is missing the point that the bill still has to be approved, and even then, no guarantees are made that the money will be available.
Typical DD knee-jerk reaction without having many of the facts. "Lets just highlight stuff, take it out of context, skip over pertinenet statements, make assinine rants, and pretend that we have two brain cells to rub together."
For many of the weak-minded, reality is boring. That's why you have Elvis sightings in the Weekly World News, the lastest Lohan adventures on Inside Edition and Judy Gatelli's teenage work history on DD.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I apologize ... I didn't even look at the date on that post ... So Dan if you are out there ... I do apologize ... thank you for pointing that out Paul.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
RE: What happened to the Daniel Hubbard posts? It's obvious isn't it? Joe's protecting Dan. It's no secret they've become pretty good friends. Guaranteed Joe didn't like the post he put up and yanked the whole thread. Pretty special treatment if you ask me. Can we all get that kind of preferred treatment or can only Dan Hubbard get it? Which one is it, Joe?
What happened to the Daniel Hubbard posts? They disappeared.
It was starting to get interesting, especially Daniel's response.
All the best with your legal troubles, Dan. I hope that this error on the courts' part is corrected soon.
Ha! Hubbard had a meltdown, and now the entire thread is gone. What a suprising turn of events.
His post to that thread, if I recall it correctly, was a sarcastic apology for not keeping the DD crowd up-to-date on his day to day life, but that he's been taking care of his father, who is apparently very ill. He went on to mock the speculation on his next move or that he'd been given a county job to "shut him up" because he's viewed as "too dangerous" or something. Offering just "speculation or ourtight lies" is what he accused the board of doing. That could not have sat well with his mentor. Finding it impossible to spin that nugget of truth, and rather than have the "embarassing" post from the golden boy remain, the entire thread got deleted. Chances are, Phil Mypocket's thread will be gone shortly, too.
Anyway, the absolute best part was when Joann wished him her best, and counseled him to "take care of" his father. Given the way Joann took care of her's, that probably sent Dan over the edge, and who can blame him? He seems like a genuinely caring family man. How easy would it have been, especially given the circumstances of her own family, to interpret "take care of your father" as "rob the bastard blind while he's ill, but before he dies" and rightly so. After all, the way Joe's advice paid off for both him and Sam in court, what's to say Joann's advice wouldn't land him in prison?
RE: What happened to the Daniel Hubbard posts? It's obvious isn't it? Joe's protecting Dan. It's no secret they've become pretty good friends. Guaranteed Joe didn't like the post he put up and yanked the whole thread. Pretty special treatment if you ask me. Can we all get that kind of preferred treatment or can only Dan Hubbard get it? Which one is it, Joe?
It's obvious isn't it? Joe's protecting Dan. It's no secret they've become pretty good friends.
This is a political forum. It's not the first time I've pulled a thread that was directing itself into the personal life of a non-public servant. The thread was about the harassment issue. That's where it should have stayed, andnot about what Hubbard does, or does not do,in his private time with his family.
Guaranteed Joe didn't like the post he put up and yanked the whole thread. Pretty special treatment if you ask me. Can we all get that kind of preferred treatment or can only Dan Hubbard get it? Which one is it, Joe?
You don't have to ask for it, it's provided for you. I've edited or removed hundreds upon hundreds of posts, sometimes entire threads,that also went "way off base". The forum's purpose is not to discuss the ailing parents ofanyone politically involved.Hubbard is a big boy, he certainly does not need me to protect him, but I will protect family members of anyone from the inclusion of non-political comments mingled with political comments, that includes Hubbard.Hubbard said it right, he's under no obligation to explain himself to anyone. However, I have an obligation to ensure that this political forum doesnot sound more likea coffee shop, and that's where that thread was going. So, revive theharassment issue here if you like, but Hubbard's family life is off limits. If he ever becomes an elected official, knock your socks off.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Hey in the DD world doesn't it the right to look into anyone's life who ever ran for a political office? Didn't Danny Boy run a write in campaign making himself a public figure ... the fact that he is the President of the LGRNA makes him a public figure in the DD world .... or at least that's how it works for most people ... but not dear little Danny!
I just think it's amazing ... special rules for special people!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
::: ... This is a political forum. It's not the first time I've pulled a thread that was directing itself into the personal life of a non-public servant. ... :::
Ex-freakin-cuse me??????? Pulled a thread that involved a non-public servant???
RE: What happened to the Daniel Hubbard posts? The line in the sand is where a family member is just as political as the elected official. That's usually the case in this area because the families are so networked together. If Mayor Doherty loses the next election, hundreds of families will be affected by it. That's why they'll all work so hard to get him elected one more time.
So tell me DD readers, just how was Judy Gatelli's granddaughter "political"? I'd love to know how an INFANT can pull that one off! How are the teenage daugthers of Tom Yerke "political"? My God, some of the DD regulars are truly blind to their own hyprocrisy
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 20:52, 2008-04-08
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
RE: What happened to the Daniel Hubbard posts? It's obvious isn't it? Joe's protecting Dan. It's no secret they've become pretty good friends. Guaranteed Joe didn't like the post he put up and yanked the whole thread. Pretty special treatment if you ask me. Can we all get that kind of preferred treatment or can only Dan Hubbard get it? Which one is it, Joe?
It's obvious isn't it? Joe's protecting Dan. It's no secret they've become pretty good friends.
This is a political forum. It's not the first time I've pulled a thread that was directing itself into the personal life of a non-public servant. The thread was about the harassment issue. That's where it should have stayed, andnot about what Hubbard does, or does not do,in his private time with his family.
Guaranteed Joe didn't like the post he put up and yanked the whole thread. Pretty special treatment if you ask me. Can we all get that kind of preferred treatment or can only Dan Hubbard get it? Which one is it, Joe?
You don't have to ask for it, it's provided for you. I've edited or removed hundreds upon hundreds of posts, sometimes entire threads,that also went "way off base". The forum's purpose is not to discuss the ailing parents ofanyone politically involved.Hubbard is a big boy, he certainly does not need me to protect him, but I will protect family members of anyone from the inclusion of non-political comments mingled with political comments, that includes Hubbard.Hubbard said it right, he's under no obligation to explain himself to anyone. However, I have an obligation to ensure that this political forum doesnot sound more likea coffee shop, and that's where that thread was going. So, revive theharassment issue here if you like, but Hubbard's family life is off limits. If he ever becomes an elected official, knock your socks off.
I love how Joet sauys "dan's family is off limits" this guy is beyond nuts....how many non elected officials have been attacked by that dirtbag........Danny take the pills the doc gave ya and shut up!!
Joe Pilchesky is flat out LYING in that he has repeatedly allowed non-politicians to be slammed at his forum.
What did Pilchesky call Scranton Times reporter Stacy Brown?
Who was referenced in that assenine thread about how Judy Gatelli was secretly conspiring to keep someone in jail? Should I go on?
Who was referenced in that thread about Tom Yerke?
Had enough?
To those from DD who are reading this (and we know there are a few of you): Seriously folks, you really do look retarded for playing along with that load of crap. Can you say "Mindless sheep, being herded by your master"?
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 06:46, 2008-04-10
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.