Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Pilchesky's Short Memory
Post Info TOPIC: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

From next door...

Joe Pilchesky

leonidas.jpg

Posts: 2201
Date: Feb 23 7:44 PM, 2008
 Views: 41
Quote | Reply
Notice: Gabrielle Prutisto's home subjected to trespasser - help wanted

I've just finished an interview with Dave Falchek from the Times who has advised me that Gabrielle has complained of "footprints in the snow around her home and a broken first floor window". She is apparently attributing this form of trespassing to exposure on this site, as Dave suggested. She is upset that pictures of her home are on this site, as well as certain documents relating to the purchase of her home at 310 Varsity Drive in Throop. I explained to Dave that the reason why the pictures of the home and documents are here relate directly to the legal challenge to Frank Shimkus' nominating petitions, one of which is a challenge to his true address.

I have no way of knowing who was on her property, if anyone was, or why they were there, but I ask that all posters keep their ears open in case they hear something that may help the police in their investigation of this incident. We certainly do not condone trespassing or harassment and it should not be tolerated. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Contact the Throop Police Dept. if you have any information.


Someone correct me if I am wrong, but it wasn't all that long ago that DD posters were claiming to root through Sherry Nealon Fanucci's garbage? Funny, but at the time Joe didn't have a problem with those postings. I guess it's only a problem when the victim actually fights back.



__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

Sure sounds like our little Joeyboy is wee weeing in his pants again. He isn't use to people actually fighting back against his tactics. I wonder what the legal liabilty might be since his site is the one which brought her location to the attention of the public. Hummmmm is she a public figure?? I am thinking...no! This could prove to be a very sticky situation. Nice try on trying to wiggle out now that the cat is already out of the bag Clarence. :)

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Art Gordon


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
RE: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

Great comment about Joe on TT.com today.


Why does that loon continue to get press?
"Mr. Pilchesky admitted that posters on his Web site use language he does not condone, but said he doesnt encourage harassment or law breaking."

Doesn't condone the language, but as an administrator, doesn't do a thing about it, either. Doesn't encourage harassment, but numerous "Info On..." posts regarding local figures that contain both public, personal, and family related info, as well as unsubstantiated claims by either unnamed sources" or sources of dubious credibility say otherwise.

The man is much less a "political activist" than he is a gossiping hatemonger with a supposed personal gripe against Scranton's mayor. Nothing the guy attempts to do serves anyones interest except his own. Take his open disdain for the Times. Articles are copy/pasted in their entirety almost daily, in clear violation of copyright laws, and he takes it as an insult when he fails to get column inches from them. An ego-maniac with an inferiority complex.

When a tantrum is given attention, it continues. This baby should be left alone to cry himself out.

J Ricci, Green Ridge




-- Edited by Art Gordon at 17:14, 2008-02-24

__________________

Make Jack pack!
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

:::::I explained to Dave that the reason why the pictures of the home and documents are here relate directly to the legal challenge to Frank Shimkus' nominating petitions, one of which is a challenge to his true address.::::::

Joe ... how would her address confirm Frank Shimkus' address? They are not yet married ... they are engaged. Just because someone is engaged to someone else does not necessarily mean that they are living together ... just because someone may spend a few nights at the home of somone else doesn't mean we should automatically assume that they live together.

I hope she nails your sorry hide to the cross ... you better pray one of your goons don't hurt this woman!


__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Art Gordon


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
RE: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

Such a stupid battle for ole' crazy Joe to wage.

The minute Shimkus answered the door to accept the papers it was over.

If Joe had been in the Shimkus camp he would have been proud of the Rev. Shimkus making that move.

Game, set, match, Shimkus.

Back to the cave Joe. Some guy like Piccolino might run again. He and his are much less politically savvy.

__________________

Make Jack pack!
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

Ag you are right and I do believe if we check our Archives ... we have copies of the posts where they make these claims!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

This little blurb was taken from the TT article ... My comments are highlighted in bold red print!
:::::Mr. Pilchesky admitted that posters on his Web site use language he does not condone, but said he doesnt encourage harassment or law breaking. (Well now if he did not condone it ... they would not be writing the crap that they write ... he and Joanne are the ones with the power to edit ... so they would edit the questionable posts ... I guess he only condones his own questionable language ... who was it that used the "N" word ... oh that's right it was Joey himself ... and if he did not condone law breaking ... he wouldn't be bragging about his colorful (tying to be polite) past ... I guess it was perfectly legal to beat Ed Henehan in the head with a crowbar .... or pipe whatever it was you used!)

As for the couples deed, home photographs and other information posted on his Web site, Mr. Pilchesky said those are supporting evidence for his complaint against Mr. Shimkus not an invitation to harass.(Come on Joey you know your posters and you knew exactly what would happen ... as someone pointed out didn't some of your posters admittedly stalk Sherry Fanucci and route through her garbage ... also didn't some of your poster also stalk Judy Gatelli ... and what was it you said to discourage this behavior ... you didn't even remove the posts ... and again I will say that we have copies of those posts in our archives as well as when one was believed to be a threat it was forwarded to the proper authorities ... I think Frank Shimkus has got you on this one!)

Mr. Shimkus, who said people have photographed both homes, characterized Mr. Pilcheskys efforts as motivated by hate and evil.(I have to agree with this statement!)

Mr. Pilchesky said hes just trying to keep elected officials honest. (Who are you to personally decide who is being honest and who is not .... I guess this is where that old saying comes in right ... Takes one to know one ... problem is you are wrong more than you are right ... someday your sheep will wake up and see you for what you really are!)

Former City Councilman Kevin Murphy has also challenged Mr. Shimkus address although each man delivered their challenges to Mr. Shimkus at the Boulevard Avenue address in Scranton where he says he is currently living. (You are so sure he lives elsewhere that you delivered the challenges to his listed address ... and he obviously got those challenges ... so my guess is he was HOME right? I can see where Mr. Murphy may have a valid reason to question this ... Now what I really want to know is this ... what the F^ck did you think would happen when you posted the address of a young woman along with pictures of her home on the WWW for the world to see ... and should anything happen to the young woman are you going to take responsibility for this? Because you should ... you should be ashamed and evil is just such an understatement for what you actually are!):::::


__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

I have a theory about all of this:

I worked with a lot of consultants over the years at the office, and one of the terms they love to use is "low hanging fruit"...meaning doing things because those things are easy (and thus able to be chalked up as an accomplishment, justifying the consultant's hefty fees). I think that's where we find Pilchesky today. He's looking for easy targets, and Rep. Shimkus seems like an easy target, given the confusion/issues around his address. Think of this though: what harm has been caused as a result of this supposed "issue" in the first place? Hold that thought...

...now move on to Mayor Doherty. According to Pilchesky and his ilk, the Mayor is the "most corrupt in history". If that's true, why then isn't Pilchesky doing more to "go after" Mayor Doherty in court? Why go after Rep Shimkus...who hasn't had the time in office to really do anything...when you have "Mayor Satan" himself with nearly 8 years and countless Pilchesky-viewed transgressions? Low hanging fruit, that's why.

DohertyDeceit isn't a cause for Pilchesky...it's a business. He sells a product...himself...and every once in a while he needs some "low hanging fruit" to justify the payment in loyalty his small band of bitter followers give him.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

From the horse(ass)'s own keyboard! You and Edith (how is your little "problem" coming along dear?)might want to keep that little comment in mind. It is indeed the "act and intention" that gets you before the court. So tellus what was the purpose (intent) of displaying and identifing (act)this young woman'sname and house? How did it in anyway support/not support your claim of Mr. Shimkus's permanent address? Did he appear in the picture?..was he building the home with a sign on his shirt that said "I live here?.....please tell usexactly how publishing the picture of house/name of woman/address made yourclaim more credible.... I will wait for your answer dear!

Joe Pilchesky

leonidas.jpg

Posts: 2203
Date: Feb 25 7:13 AM, 2008
Views: 6
Quote | Reply
RE: SHH DONT TELL ANYONE...BRAZIL COVER UP TAKING OFF

There are convicted bank robbers doing serious time for bank robbery 'attempts' that netted them no money. It's the "act". It's the 'intention' that gets you before the court. Restitution is only a part of the accountability. And, $400.00 is cheap. $2,500.00 is more like it.


__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

Kind of like intentionally stealing over $100,000 from a dying old man will get you brought before the courts ... hmmmmmm .... I see your point IHave!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Paul


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
RE: Pilchesky's Short Memory
Permalink  
 

Art Gordon wrote:

Great comment about Joe on TT.com today.


Why does that loon continue to get press?

"Mr. Pilchesky admitted that posters on his Web site use language he does not condone, but said he doesnt encourage harassment or law breaking."

Doesn't condone the language, but as an administrator, doesn't do a thing about it, either. Doesn't encourage harassment, but numerous "Info On..." posts regarding local figures that contain both public, personal, and family related info, as well as unsubstantiated claims by either unnamed sources" or sources of dubious credibility say otherwise.

The man is much less a "political activist" than he is a gossiping hatemonger with a supposed personal gripe against Scranton's mayor. Nothing the guy attempts to do serves anyones interest except his own. Take his open disdain for the Times. Articles are copy/pasted in their entirety almost daily, in clear violation of copyright laws, and he takes it as an insult when he fails to get column inches from them. An ego-maniac with an inferiority complex.

When a tantrum is given attention, it continues. This baby should be left alone to cry himself out.

J Ricci, Green Ridge (ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!)




-- Edited by Art Gordon at 17:14, 2008-02-24
Seems the suggestion worked. Not a word about the idiot since being slammed in the reader comments for three straight days. biggrin


-- Edited by Paul at 10:04, 2008-02-26

__________________

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Pilchesky's Short Memory
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard