Lest we forget, this is the same group that believes that Pilchesky has a winning record in the courtroom. Hearing what they want to hear is simply par for the course.
NADB simply serves as Pilchesky's "Information Minister", spoon-feeding facts selectively chosen for DD puppy consumption.
As for myself, I've always thought that the best source of information were sources of information. No one group...newspaper...or person has a monopoly on the "truth".
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.