I unfortunately only caught about the first hour of it. If you didn't see it, catch the re-broadcast.
Classic, old-school Lyman at work, claiming representation by Munley, Munley and Cartright (I guess he fired Attorney Kowalski), threatening to sue the city for exactly $10.2 million (or something like that). Eventually had to be removed from konsil chambers by the police officer. Someone needs to get that one up on YouTube ASAP.
The second funniest moment was when Mrs Hubbard (who does seem like a nice lady, btw) complained about having to pay $250 to get rid of two skunks, after "one sprayed Daniel". Gee, even the skunks don't like Danny. And who says animals are dumb?
Danny, looking as pasty as a non-living dead can get, ranting about trees in South Side and his siren not being installed in Lower Greenridge. For the life of me, can someone just get him a siren? Hey, maybe we can stick Danny on a pole near the river, as he whines as well as anything else.
Les off his game, as he didn't have Janet Evans to swoon to, as evidenced by the fact that he was actually polite to Judy Gatelli.
Her royal highness herself was missing from the first part of the meeting. I didn't catch the reason. Perhaps David took chase to a Green Volvo in the Benz on the way to the meeting.
Lee Morgan trying to make some kind of point about something having to do with the tragic death of his daughter. My heart goes out to him on that one, but for the life of me I couldn't figure out how that event had anything to do with anything else he was saying.
Sammy acting all calm & stuff. Funny, but if infamous tirade wasn't illegal, why change his demeanor at all his subsequent appearances?
I don't know if Fay made an appearance, although I didn't see her lurking in the background.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I really love watching them run in circles. Over on their board it is the same thing. They run around and around and get nowhere. It is truly sweet sweet irony!
Please, keep it up, you have no clue how satisfying it is.
Not that their understanding is the best example, but Les and Ray clearly demosntrate how painfully ignorant that group is when it comes to the meaning of the First Amendment and what is and is not covered.
If I want a deck put on my house, I don't go to an attorney who specializes in Constitutional Law to get it done, no matter how handy he may be. By the same token, when I want to understand my First Amendment rights clearly and accurately, I do not call on a mentally challenged unemployed sh!tforbrains carpenter with a future felon for a wife and a bookshelf full of Law for Dickheads books to expalin them to me.
Common sense takes a back seat when you join a group that thinks that it's perfectly ok to drag the minor children/grandchildren of politicians into internet hit jobs.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
What's kind of amazing is the number of people that come up not to talk about an issue that personally impacts them, but instead just want to run on the mouth about how they are somehow "oppressed". Think about it...how much different is Jimmy Stucker's rant than, say, Sammy's? At least Stucker has a real issue...his scooter being stolen.
The one that makes me cringe though is Danny Hubbard, as he comes across with this air of smugness and superiority. If ever there was a genius in his own mind, it's Danny.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
