Well, just when i thought Joe and his idiots had hit rock bottom, they go and out do themselves again!!
I am speaking of their thread about liz Randol. She was W/O Campaign Manager and now was appointed by them to their camp. I know Liz, personally from my days at the U. WOW are they off the mark!!! She is as sharp as a tack and is such an asset to our county.
My first encounter with her was as a guest speaker in a Political theory class I had with professor Van Dyke. Liz came in to speak about communism, womans rights, ect. She was articulate, extremly smart and easy to understand. I was very very impressed.
She was a fixture at the school for her abundance of knowledge, and the fact that she was soo easy to speak with and nice. (Plus Hot) I can't get over the fact that these jackasses who don't know her are already doubting her.
This proves their style of rumor before truth and slander when you can't articulate a good argument defence. They are beyond ignorant. They arethe reason people Like Liz leave the area. God help Scranton, cause with residents like them you're guna need it!!!!!
Just to add one more thing, Anti in his eternal wisdom chimed in with some statement about Dr. Yamanuchi Rynn. She is another good frined, and I took about 6 classes with her. She was a sociology professor with more qualifications and feathers in her hat than Joes board X1000.
She is a noted scholar oin her feild and is respected rightly for it. On top of that, do a little research and find out who her brother is. It will knock your socks off to think she is teaching here in little Scranton. She derserves the recognition because for a while she was swept under the rug. Yet another asset to our community that people like Kurt Shotko would like to see gone.
Never let it be said that Joe's boys & girls let little things like qualifications get in the way of a good bashing. It all reminds me of the lyrics to the Jefferson Airplane song White Rabbit...
When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead
Which pretty much describes the mode of operation at DD.
While I don't know either of the individuals you referenced, surprise, I tend to assume that people will work hard and honestly until proven otherwise. I know...that would make me a very poor candidate for DD membership.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
It is things like this that gives them Zero credibility. Believe it or not the main theory behind that board is a good one. Shed light into government and give the people the opportunity to speak freely about it. I am all about that. They ruin it by having no real facts, rumor mongering and ignorance. On top of all that they are pushing a union agenda. They are as meritless and irrelavant as a group of citizens can every possibly be. They sabotaged themselves politicaly much like they sabotage themselves financially, career wise and life-wise!
Speaking of that piece of walking fecal matter AntiSemiticMovements, let's look at his post on this subject, in all of it's wretched glory.[My comments are in Red Bracketed text].
W/B first hire - Randol - No, she's no crony? She's held an appointment at U of S, is that correct? She's a crony. ['Crony' is Anti's version of 'the n-word' (sorry, activeboard will not let me write the actual word), Mick, Spic, Wop, Dago, etc. Basically a one word descriptive that imprints the target with a sterotyped negative, no matter who the individual is in question. A classic racist tactic. Dr Goebells would be proud.] Look at the former anthropology professor appointed by Denaples to be on the gaming board. In exchange for her services, she's now administration at LJC. [Help me out here...just what does Dr Randol have to do with the Gaming Commission or LJC? Anyone can make any connection to anything these days. Anti also implies a connection to Boogey Man Louis DeNaples here...if only because that can stir up some much needed hatred. Six degrees of separation...give me Anti's resume and I'll connect him to Pol Pot.]
Don't let Randol's PHD mislead you into believing she isn't a crony and that she is automatically qualified. She's got her PHD in the SPEL program, one of Binghamton's least competitive graduate programs. [Least competitive graduate programs? That's almost so stupid as to be funny. First, ANY PhD program from an accredited University is competitive. Second, the fact is that she has invested over seven years of her life into furthering her education. By that fact alone she should be admired. The fact that Anti doesn't like her degree means something to Anti, and that's about it.] If her PHD was in political science, you might convince me she's some intellectual power house. [Anyone else sense some jealousy here? Funny, Anti doesn't reference HIS qualifications in the posting. Nope, Anti simply loves to cast stones.]
I agree with Fletch: her degree doesn't make her qualified. Especially a philosophy deagree. [I've never taken a Philosophy course in college...my degrees are in Engineering and Businesss Administration. However my daughter is currently taking Philosophy at Kutztown, and it is one of the more difficult classes she has experienced to date. Now that doesn't really add anything to this argument per say, other than my basing an opinion on something factual (my daugther's experience)...and Anti is basing his opinion on, well, nothing other than his normal fact-less prejudice.] I'm certain the literature on Tammany [Anti has a Tammany quota he needs to fill in his postings, as he seems to think that anything and everything can be connected to past politics in New York City. I guess in his mind that makes him DD's intellectual. Well, that may impress the likes of Milo, but speaking for myself, his references are equivalent to the 70's saying "Where's the Beef"...over-used and silly.] is more helpful for the jobs she will be performing than Arendt and Luxemburg.
__________________ " [The Irish Catholic Network] has kept us from leading by insisting to us that we weren't good enough because of our ethnicity, our political party, or where we lived." -- Mrs. Cordaro
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Yes, rumor has it that she actually has female reproductive organs, so technically that would make her a woman. Note that I didn't use the term lady though, and I'm not going to dwell on her actually reproducing (or what that would entail...omg, that's way too disgusting for 6:56am).
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Yes, rumor has it that she actually has female reproductive organs, so technically that would make her a woman. Note that I didn't use the term lady though, and I'm not going to dwell on her actually reproducing (or what that would entail...omg, that's way too disgusting for 6:56am).
Damn!! It is wayyyyyy to early for me to have to think about that!! LOL LOL