So, you thought serial-plaintiff Pilchesky was just a legal, political, and publishing expert? Well my friends, we can now add to that list the title of TV Programming expert:
RE: Channel 61 Funding 61 hurts itelf to some degree. I've talked with some of its board members. They're not too eager about programming that would be beneficial to the taxpayers in terms of providing programs with people in the know about all that is wrong with this city. They've been offered plenty of opportunity to give the people a good dose of honesty about this adminsitration, but they don't have the interest in good government as they should have. They've given Doherty and Mellow tons of free time, but they refuse to give time to anyone who wants to bring the truth to the people. If they're reaching out for taxpayers to contribute, they have to give something in return that works for them. 61 is still looked upon as crony to a large degree. They've bent in the breeze. Give us something worth the money and they'd be laughing all the way to the bank. We'd all pay to hear the truth. See documents. Listen to the words of people who can explain exactly how things are done in this city. It's a great source of information, but they have to allow the information to come forward.
What what Pilchesky is really saying here is that since Channel 61 will not televise his rants, it's no good. My God, what an arrogant piece of work.
Anyway, so here's the scoop: If Joe Pilchesky were in charge of programming at Channel 61, what shows would he put on the air? Here are a few thoughts from yours truly...
"Name the Jew" A game show with AntiSemiticMovements as host, where contestants try and guess whether or not named famous people are Jewish. Winners receive a copy of The Communist Manifesto. "Fight the Power!" An hour of civil disobedience starring Sam Patilla. For the first eposide, he protests in front on the IHM Convent on Wyoming Avenue, cold-****ing Sr. Mary Agnes in the process.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 06:42, 2007-10-10
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.