JOE EXPOSED This is Maria posting since Joe disabled my account. First off Joe, Gio NEVER gave you authority to post under his name. We gave you authority to edit TYPOS notto post under his nameas you stated in your post. Second, I had a law enforcement friend of mine run some IP addresses of the users on your board and it appears that you are posting under several different users and arguing with yourself. You want exposure, you got it now. Third, hundreds, yes hundreds of prominent people have warned me to stay away from you with regards to this website. They all indicated that you have ZERO credability in Scranton and the same of your website. You are 1-43 with lawsuits in Scranton Joe. Your same record will hold true when you try to discredit Gio. People will see right through you, they apparently already do. Several of them even stopped by the pizza shop to say what a basket case you are. You burned one to many bridges in Scranton Joe and now you burned you last one with me. Don't you have another million lawsuits to file? How come you never filed one against Doherty? Actually, I want to thank you for the extra thousands of votes for my brother. Since you are nowNOT backing Gio the thousands of people that know you have ZERO credability will now be voting for him because they know voting opposite of you is a sure winner. See you in November.
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
I posted that in another thread, but it bears repeating, and it's probably better off in it;s own thread anyway.
I love Moosicman's response. Can't figure out if that's the post of his realization that Joe is really just an impotent little man, or the fact that Joe now has a new target that he's going to "discredit" into an actual challenger come November.
Sadly they never noticed that that is the direction that it has always been heading ...
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I think there is a graduate degree thesis somewhere in all of this mess.
Why? I find it so very interesting that some of the troops really want to believe that Pilchesky is their savior so badly that they are blind to the basic facts that are now slapping them in the face. Sure, this may peel off a few of the posters, and others may post less frequently for a while, but there will still be a core that really want to believe. Patilla is a classic example. I think Pilchesky could kill another human being in broad daylight and, with the right words, have Patilla supporting him up to the electric chair. So while we enjoy with a Springer-esque facination the latest machinations of Pilchesky, it's rather sad to see this degree of control he seems to have over his small, core band of foul followers. They never learned the lesson that I think many of us have: if you want a savior on this Earth, the first place to look is in the mirror.
In summary, many of the DD crew want a savior at all costs and Pilchesky is now running up the bill.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Of all the possible things to bring about the end of DD, I never imagined it would be Giovanni Piccolino. With credibility now at zero, there is no longer any point of playing devil's advocate.
I'll ban myself, thanks. Third term, here we come.
I think you're wrong Glenn...it wasn't Piccolino that brought about the end of DD...Piccolino was just 'convenient'. This is a purely self-inflicted wound on the part of Joe Pilchesky.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I'll say it again as I've done before. Not everything that's posted "over there" makes me happy. I can agree or disagree with many posts. It's not for me to judge and I won't. I stay away from judging posts to the point where I get criticized here, but it's not my purpose. I can disagree with many posters but I still believe that DD is makng a difference. Many people read it daily and Joe provides that service. For that I'm thankful because this area has been stuck in a politically oppressed state. Something needs to be done around here to break the chain of corruption. DD is a start. This message board counters what's happening there. In the big picture and all negativity aside, at least something is happening. We're finally exchanging thoughts with each other, good and bad. It's better than nothing at all, the way I see it.
Now Shari don't take this wrong as I am trying to understand your thinking on this ... and I really want to know what your take is on this ... you have not given your DD identity up so you can feel safe and give us an honest opinion here ... Joe will not know which poster you are unless of course you have told him about your posts here.
One form of corruption is ok as long as it exposes another form of corruption ... I don't think so ... Joe in my opinion is the lowest of the low ... and now he has gone even lower than I even thought was possible.
But I ask this ... Joe made the statement that he accessed Piccilino's account ... used it to make a false post ... then he called Maria and told her that he had to do it to make corrections ... typo's and grammatical errors ... basically he told them that he would edit these posts (Joe's words) ...
Later he claims that he has permission from Piccilino to write replys to questions ... but this is my question ... where is the proof of this statement ... where is the email or PM to back up this statement ... and even if it is a PM ... how do we know that Joe did not write it and send it to himself when he accessed this account?
And how can any poster who has been edited for clarity ... or anything else be sure that Joe has not accessed their accounts on one occasion or another and done the same thing to them????
He claims to be there for them ... but in my opinion ... he needs them to further his own personal agenda ... and again I will say ... there is no way this whole thing is over a ramp!
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 06:01, 2007-09-23
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I can also agree or disagree with many DD posters. In fact, I've read somethings at DD that I thought were spot-on correct. However, I think that in life there are certain lines which should never be crossed. For example, one such line is to wish death on someone else. That's happened on DD, this month in fact. If Shari/Bo can read something like that and stay silent, well then that silence speaks volumes in and of itself.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 08:43, 2007-09-23
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Listen, I hear what both of you are saying, but I only try to change things that I can actually have an effect on. I cannot control what people post. I can only express my opinion on posts I don't agree with. I can't stop them.
As far as my purpose for posting here and there? I feel my city is being put up for sale to a certain few. I don't like it and I focus my attention on that. Everything else is not important to me. If I cannot effect change, by being a "moral authority" on those issues, why try? I've sent private messages to numerous posters about wrong information or just plain nastiness. Some have listened and toned it down, some have given me the proverbial "gfy". I came here to bring light to city issues. My mistake. This is not the forum for it as I've been told by all of you. My point is Joe does not raise my taxes, lower my services or ruin my city government. My elected officials do. That's most important to me. I again, use his forum to share information, state my opinions and hopefully make people aware of certain issues. What others do and say on other issues is their business, not mine. If I don't like it, I won't engage their posts. I "change the channel" so to speak. I'm not a moderator over there, nor do I have any influence. I'm a bit player, nothing more.
There are alot of nut cases that posted responses to that thread, however this is my favorite idiot's comments.......some people will never learn. They are pressing the jumpsuit on N Washington Ave. now,
"I've paid more taxes in a year than Joe has paid in his life. Open your mouths Joe lovers i got a big piece of italian sausage for you to swallow. A bunch of inbreeds we'll see who's the moron when i slap a suit on his dumb ass and you'll find out like the city I don't mess around this site will be shut down soon THE DAWGS ARE COMING I MEAN THE BIG DAWGS."
That post reeks of the "RACIST Regime now listed as the City of Scranton's sitting Administration!
So I take it that behind our backs you're calling "MY" PEOPLE than nasty "N" Word and Hispanics that nasty "S" word or worse?
You're right the BIGG DAWGS are coming, I had intended on saving them for the Appeal Process in Gatelli's and Dohtery's bogus charges against me, seeing as how the Plan is "EXPOSURE"
Expose Doherty for the Racist that he is
Expose Gatelli for the Self-Promoting Racist that she is
Expose the County D.A. for the Racisit that He Is
Expose whichever Judge and or Judges that follows through with this case for the Racist that he is
Expose that clow of an A.D.A. for the twit that he really is
and Expose any "PERSON" seeking "PUBLIC" office in the City of Scranton and or Lackawanna County not placing the Tax Payers/Residents 1st and Formost for the "RACIST" that they ARE!
That post reeks, regardless of how you now feel about Joe "P" and or his supporters
You F****** UP Big Time but it wasn't anything that couldn't have been fix but did you seek to remedy or explain yourself - "NO" you and your sister came out firing from both barrels Hot headed and intent on F****** UP your OWN Campaign by driving that wedge even deeper.
The PEOPLE of SCRANTON Deserve better and have EARNED MORE than a kick in the arse by every clown elected, seeking to be elected or appointed into PUBLIC OFFICE
I'm not running for office and doubt if I ever will but with that being said
The Senior Citizens: LOVE ME
The Working Class Joe & Joans: LOVE ME
The Baby BOOMERS: LOVE ME
The PEOPLE of COLOR: LOVE ME
Those that "Don't Reside" in Scranton: LOVE ME
The kids in the many schools of HIGHER EDUCATION scattered throughout Scranton: LOVE ME
The NONE RACIST: LOVE ME
and the PUPPET MASTERS: LOVE Me [but only because I'm smarter than 200 of their Scranton puppets and assorted kool-aid drinkers]
Why because I'm "FOR THEM" 1,000 percent and NOT seeking anything for "MYSELF"
After that outburst of offering your lil pecker to good honest hardworking people, Now might be the best time to pull out-You have my word that I won't allow them to STOIP fighting for your Families business but that was as "FOUL" as "FOUL" can get [almost as foul as the shyyat that doherty and the 2 men and a wimp rubberstampers that he placed on Council are known for]
I have not run across many people that love Sam Patilla ... I have run across people that love to laugh at Sam Patilla.
I want to know what in GP's post made racist statements? I didn't see it ... I do see the racist in Patilla and in Anti ... but not in GP or in his sister's post ... hmmmm ... am I blind ... where is it?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Be a clown, be a clown All the world loves a clown Be a crazy buffoon And the demoisellesll all swoon Dress in huge baggy pants And youll ride the road to romance A butcher or a baker ladies never embrace A barber or a beau would be a social disgrace They allll come to call if you can fall on your face Be a clown, be a clown, be a clown
The only person that loves a Sam is himself.........and those on N Washington Ave will soon love him as well. Sam your a bafoon with a third grade education.
I noticed that none of the "old" DD posters have jumped inon this train wreck.
They must be lying low till later in the week to see how the outcome of the Public Citizen vs. Gatelli appeal work s out. One positive they have going in is that according to Clarence he's sitting second chair.
This wholemessis not just a Master's discertation, it's someones PhD. I can hear it now at commencement - "recieving their PhD in Psychology based upon their discertation - Blind loyality to a "Jim Jones" figure by a group of empoverished and disfunctional citizens..."
The other thing they're all wacked out about again is IP addresses.
What they haven't realized yet is that the cookies your PC sends out has more information about you that an IP address.
Furthermore, the FBI does not need a court order to obtain an IP address.Google Section 215 of the Patriot Act to see what I mean. Whether the LOaDs realize it or not - the IPS has to comply and does not have to inform you that they provided that information to them.
So now someone can gettheirIPaddress by filing a FOIA with regards to DD and the posters over there. Or if someone had former ties to Homeland Security they could have called in a favor or met someone for lunch. At lunch they just happen to bring the file with user names & IP adresses. They excuse themselves to go take a cell call outside the resturant for a few minutes and "accidently" left the file at the table.
Also I wouldn't put too much stock in the amount of views a topic generates over at DD. The counter is set up to increase every time someone goes into a topic. Some counters send out a cookie so they track viewers not views. DD's is set up to count views, so someone could sit there and toggle back and forth between a topic and "crank" the views or "hits" up. Be realistic, do you actualy think 2000 people on a late Saturday night viewed that topic in the period of 2 hours. Or even 4000 views by early morning. It might have been someone bored with the Iowa - Wisconsin game and played a game of crank up the views.
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
RE: JOE EXPOSED OK, ENOUGH! Whatever this post is about, and I admit I quit reading word for word many posts ago, what the hell??? You are fighting with each other and losing sight of the goal. This sight is about doherty and his dirty deals, hence the DD! I am shocked that so many of you great posters have fallen into the crap trap. Knock if off for cripes sake and concentrate on the big picture. If we disagree on a subject, so be it. We, I HOPE, still have that right. But personal attacks are not where we need to go. Let us get back on track, PLEASE!!!!
I think what Deleware doesn't see is that THIS IS THE TRACK. Lying, manipulating, rumor mongering...that's what DD and Pilchesky are all about. The Joe Exposed thread simply makes it so overt that even Granma can probably see things for what they are (well, that may be stretching it a bit). As far as disagreements being allowed, I suggest Deleware re-read the old postings from 'Darth Art'...he will find his answers there.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 06:47, 2007-09-24
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Hey Agam you can disagree on DD as long as you keep to yourself!! LOL LOL Free Speech? Ya!.... only if you are Joey the rest better get in line and zip it if they have a complaint!
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Good question, as I've not seen anything from her lately. I hope she is alright. Maybe all the anti-police rhetoric coming out of holes of that racists swine Anti and Sammy-Boy Patilla has her spooked.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Maybe she's out walking her dog in the dog park that she fought so hard to get, then complained about the cost.. Some folks just have to have something to complain about.
If the project was not taking place on lackawanna ave and his property was not going to be taken from him he would not be running for city council. He has no interest in the people of the city his only reason is because of his property is going to be taken where was he in all the other elections? His building is a one story building in a two story town be gone already.
Granma is not the one who fought for the Dog Park and then bitched about the cost that was Fay Franus ...
And to LOD people generally do have a problem that inspires them to run ... now before you get your panties in a bunch ... I am not voting for Gio ... I'm just saying that most people do run with one thing in mind ... they want it not to happen to them and most ... want to prevent the same problem from happening to others ... so is it a bad thing ... in my opinion ... and it's only my opinion ... No it's not a bad thing ...
Joe did wrong but people can't see that ... he claims he got approval via PM from Gio ... well again I will ask ... how the hell do we know Joe didn't write the damn thing himself ... he already admitted to writing one post prior to gaining approval ... so how the hell do we know that he truly had the approval of Gio to write anything ... why do I ask ... because the approval came via a DD PM ... Think about it people!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.