Can anyone please drown Brown at Nay Aug? Maybe he can be drowned in his own articles, they're certainly deep enough with bull****. This park's article is today's paper is such a bunch of bunk it made me physically ill. Hasn't that ******* Brown been to the park, or any of the parks lately? What's with this stroking of Doherty again. Three stroking articles in a row, two from Brown and one from Borys. Prep for the mayor's convention coming here next week or what? Who knows, but that no good Stacy Brown should write a truthful article about the real condition of the park. He didn't mention the dilapidated greenhouse, the totally illegal poolhouse, the joke of a zoo, the washed out Davis Trail, the horrible condition of the grounds inside the pool area, the collapsed amphitheater and the list can go on and on. C'mon Brown, get your head out of Doherty's ass and write something truthful. You're making all of us sick out here.
For Christ's sake, if Doherty ran down four people in a drunken stupor, and got out of his car and helped an old lady across the street, the headline would be: "Mayor helps old lady across the street".
RE: Can anyone please drown Brown at Nay Aug? Brown's stories are hacked to death by the PR squad. Stacy tried writing the truth a long time ago and saw it was a waste of his time. It's not all Stacy'd fault. Besides, if Stacy wasn't writing them, someone else would be. He picked up what Lynn Slack Shedlock left off. She just refused to write another spin story. Lynn landed on her feet at the State Building. Thanks Mellow, you took good care of your own there. Good luck, Lynn, but watch you back, Hon.
I think this is a timely reprint. I believe we had some who have questioned whether Joe is or is not responsible for posts. I will let Joe speak for himself on the subject.
RE: Wanted: Anything and everything on Robert Mazzoni's professional career I'm 'ultimately' responsible for everything that gets printed here because as the Admin, I can delete what I deem inappropriate. Therefore, undeleted equally mean it has my blessing. Since I've deleted many things that were inappropriate in my view, I've made myself completely 'ultimately' responsible for what is posted here. I don't delete many posts, but I edit quite a few to protect all of us. Some Admins of some boards don't touch anything posted, because once they do, then they're establishing themselves as the censor. That accomplished, things that go uncensored that achieve a legal challenge can compromise both poster and Admin. That's why I ride herd on this board closely. I'm on the hook for what is posted and allowed to stay up, but if something is posted that is offensive and I remove it timely, there is no hook. I don't know what you mean by 'playing' both sides of the argument. I seldom interfere with debates or discusson on this board between other posters. I pull bad language or threats down, but that's just about it.
that's bull that he pulls down bad language ... and threats ... well ok threats be he allows them to remain much longer than they should.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Not sure if this will be sanitized...but there is at least a fighting chance it might be "edited for clarity" once Pilchesky sees it. Might make for an interesting before/after.
These FBI interviews are directly centered on the grossly corrupt Doherty Administration and the various corrupt Authorities. Period.
Evans is not a target. I can't say the same for Gatelli.
Pizza Man, reel it in. Your statements are false and baseless. This is very serious. Do not continue to insinuate that everyone interviewed had to resign from office or was on the other side of the law.
Reel what in?? No insinuations. Fact. Every Public official who has been interviewed by the Feds so far in Luzerne and lackawanna County has either been charged or has resigned. Fact. So you tell me which one wasnt???
-- Edited by Agamemnon on Wednesday 31st of March 2010 09:28:43 PM
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Loved to have been a fly on the wall for that one... not to mention if they start talking to her psycho husband and kid....YIKES! Holy crap I wonder how long it took for her to say HHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOO lol their ears were probably bleeding by the time they showed her the door lol lol
Hmmmm I see a banning in Pizza Man's future ... in his very near future ... what Janet isn't capable of being corrupt ... those are the ones that always fall ... Pilchesky thinks his queen is above the law ... I am hoping that the feds get out of Scranton and Lackawanna county with minimum damage ... I don't even want Janet to be corrupt ... the whole thing is very sad when you think about it.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.