RE: Smoking ban crap The action I withdrew and refiled in Harrisburg to try to avoid the Black Judicial Hole of Lackawanna County was unfortunately transferred back up here. I tried to eliminate the horrific unethical puppets we call judges in this county, but it didn't work. CLICK HERE
One word comes to mind: BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Seriously...There are reasons why your parents teach you when you are a child to be respectful of others, especially those in authority. It's not about kissing butts, but I'd respectfully suggest that, for example, engaging in a name-calling contest with sitting judges is probably NOT a good idea.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
The only bridge the old man hasn't burned is the one connecting him to Janet Evans. By her recent actions, it seems as though she may be the one who is fanning the kindling under that one. I say give the old ba$tard enough rope to hang himself.
Seeing as how far the Pilchesky Stamp of Approval took many candidates, perhaps Evans is showing a smidge of sense and distance herself from him. Again. She tried this about 6 weeks ago but it didn't last long. We'll see how long it last now that votes may be involved.
Oh this is going to fun!! Ask any attorney they'll tell ya!! Always try to really.....really.... piss off the Judge you have to appear in front of................ya baby!!That always helps your client big time!!Well you know what they say about repesenting yourself in court don't you??
NotADumbBlonde Posts: 239 Date: Thu May 17 9:15 AM, 2007 Views: 22 Quote | Reply SUE HENRY TO TALK ABOUT PILCHESKY THREAT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WILL REPLAY CORDARO THREAT WITHIN THIS HALF HOUR!!!
aquamg Posts: 143 Date: Thu May 17 9:18 AM, 2007 Views: 10 Quote | Reply RE: SUE HENRY TO TALK ABOUT PILCHESKY THREAT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9:10 AM Wilk --telephone number 883--0098 if you'd like to call
NotADumbBlonde Posts: 239 Date: Thu May 17 9:20 AM, 2007 Views: 2 Quote | Reply RE: SUE HENRY TO TALK ABOUT PILCHESKY THREAT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sue just replayed tape. Cordaro said that we'll thrash him (Joe) at every step. He (Joe) won't stop progress in Lackawanna County.
How about putting your teaching duties on hold so that you can make multiple postings on a message board and listen to talk radio for the better part of an hour.
Can't we sneek someone in to the school to keep tabs on the crap that bitch gets away with? Ugh, I have to get myself all hyped up for her monotonous blather tonight. It doesn't make sense to watch her unless you've got a fistful of tequila and a juicy lime.
Joey was actually on whinning that Mr. Cordaro called him a stooge. Joey doesn't think name calling is the right thing to do...oh really Joey?? So exactly how do you explain the constant name calling on your website? You know names you have for Mr. Mellow, Mr McGoff, Mrs. Gatelli, and the list goes on and on.......
Bullies don't like it when the victim fights back ... and that is exactly what is going on in this situation ... the victim is fighting back against that big bully.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
No they don't Lus, and serial-plaintiff Joe Pilchesky is a bully par excellence.
Another piece of this has to do with playing by the rules. SP Pilchesky (sorry, I get tired of typing 'serial plaintiff' all the time) uses imagies of Pit Bulls fighting and the like to justify the fact that he doesn't need to play by any rules. See this whinning about WILK's Steve Corbett growing some vertebrae...
So accoding to PilcheskyLogic 101, I could eventually kill someone because I disagree with their political policies, as according to his rules, there are no rules with regards to fighting against perceived corruption. What Pilchesky misses is the fact that HE BECOMES WORSE THAN THOSE HE OPPOSES every time he ups the ante in terms of inflammatory rhetoric, senseless lawsuits, etc. The logic of "I can do anything I want because I reserve the right to be the exclusive judge of my own actions" is precisely what power-hungry megalomaniacs have been doing for centuries. Fortunately for us, SP Pilchesky is a very small fish in a very small pond who will soon discover that THERE ARE RULES in a civilized society, even for 'Pit Bulls'.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Well cripes, if Les has anything to say about it, the old pit bull himself would be banned from the city. Hmmm, Les hasn't been bitching about pit bulls lately, has he?
Ag she's obsessed with Les ... I really think we need to send her for help at this point ...
Oh and wasn't it just recently that they were praising this radio show ... now they hate them ... or at least they are starting to hate them ... and why ... how dare this guy question to Almighty Curley Joe Pilchesky ... #1 Stooge of Scranton Dirty Politics ... Oh how they turn on someone as soon as they disagree with them.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
At DD, it's important to maintain the orthodoxy, and as long as you don't violate either a few simple rules (#1 Being "Thou Shall Not Question Pilchesky), you can post the most outrageous crap in the world and the DD crew will be fine with it...anyone who has read some of the stuff Antisemiticmovements has posted knows what I am talking about.
Some (not all) of the DD posters really seem to want a simple, 'black and white' view of the world presented for them, as that's easier than having to think in a discerning manner about the important issues facing the city.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
How about how they are even turning on Glenn ... and why ... someone probably told Joe that he has registered and is posting over here ... so now they are saying the reason Kenny won was ... "There was nobody else in the race" to that all I can say is Wow ...
They would turn on their own mothers if the didn't agree with them ... crazy ...
I love it ... and here we are over here ... we disagree on things ... we don't like something ... but understand the need for it ... we may not like a story in the Times ... but we do not condem the entire Paper for one article ... I personally do not like the fact that Pilchesky gets his story on page one all of the time ... I think that they should be burried back in the obits ... but that's only my opinion ... all of the front page publicity is what makes him keep going ... and he hates the times ... Yeah Right!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Ag, honey, I think Les's ass looks fierce in those cinch-waisted jeans he wears. Ever notice he just backs away from the podium??? It's because he doesn't want me ogling his buttocks. (is it getting hot in here?)