The admin edited for typos - he should have edited for stupidity.

I was actually going to post that one ... but the new thread option is giving me trouble today ... I'm glad someone else picked up on that one ... I read that and I saw it ... couldn't believe that Curley Joe left it up with such a big mistake in it .... hmmmmm so maybe Joey is Melissa also

Could you just picture him as a drag queen ... hell that's insulting to the real drag queens.

Yeah, I agree Art - great post!!! You 'da man Art!!!

Art....you are hilarious!!

I noticed that and since I am not banned over there yet I reposted the original and asked for a simple explanation (see below).

His response raises more questions than he's answered:

Administrator Posts: 93 Date: Mon May 7 10:39 AM, 2007 Views: 90

Quote | Reply RE: The Power of 1, Joe Pilchesky, from the Times Leader The "Melissa" post that was edited by me was edited at the request of Melissa without explanation. None is required. You can PM her if you like and ask for a further explanation. Most of the time when you see the words (edited for typos) I get a Private Message stating that a poster would like something changed or correct. It happens every day. I don't have to grant the change, but do so as a courtesy. I prefer the post to stay up as originally posted, but fast typing often leads to numerous typos that can change the meaning of a post, i.e., where a poster meant to type 'without' and typed 'with', there can be a change in meaning. You should also be aware that there are many households with many posters participating here. It's very possible Melissa didn't log out and someone else in the same house jumped on and posted forgetting to sign in. Who knows? I can fix the content of a post, but I cannot fix the poster name. Keep in mind that the purpose of the board is politics, and not pointing out who was edited, when or why. There's a city dripping with corruption, go get some and come back here with it if your eye is so keen to spot something irregular.

Questions I am left with are:

1. If it was in fact another member of her household who posted the response, then why wasnt' it reposted by the administrator with an explanation? We've seen moved posts like that all the time.
2. Giving the benefit of the doubt, if it was another member in the same household, why not either post under their own account, taking credit for it, or PM Joe from their own account?
2. If he has IP addresses, and an administrator does, it is entirely possible for him to tell if it's someone from the same household using the same computer. Why this transparent explanation? Clearly, none of it's true.
3. Why are Granma's, Harsh Times', and cyber's incoherent posts never edited for clarity? Nevermind the typos, but Harsh's 13375p34k crap is just incomprehendable most times. Those online personna's of Joe's do nothing to further the impression that the average poster there has more than a third grade education. Their ignorance destroys any shred of credibility that site may have ever had.
4. If he's such a political activist, registered to vote in Lackawanna county, then why has he voted in less than 40% of the elections in which he was eligible to vote? Some activists have voted in roughly 100% of the elections for which they are eligible. I can see missing one or two, occasionally, but there's no excuse for someone who claims to be an activist to miss voting in every election over the course of six years. Then again, he's not an "activist" so much as he's an "attention whore."

The peckerhead really just has no clue.

Finally, coincidentally, even his Administrator avatar is flaming.

-- Edited by Paul at 14:35, 2007-05-07

Sometimes I type so fast I refer to myself while meaning to agree with another poster.

Well Art you know I'm here to help ... that's my job.

I agree with Art - you're awesome!!!!

psst, Art ... ahem ... your slip is showing

Maybe that's where Milo went - the land of "edited for irrelevant content."

Lus, milo has a new name over there it is Frickellmoie

Uh oh do we have another instance of one poster forgetting what screen namethey posted what comment under?? :)


Ok first we have Nelson apologizing for saying council will not be meeting for two months July and Aug.

He thenmentions that Grandma's comments are correct.

Problem there is she was responding to Do's Mule

Post Info

TOPIC: Council hopping tonight!! Coney Island demands an apology

DOs Mule Posts: 140 Date: Jun 3 7:26 PM, 2008 Views: 845

Council Meeting 6.3.08 Recess,, Coney Island and more borrowing Did I hear the speakers right? Are they taking off two months, July, and August during the summer? How will business be conducted? Are they hiding from the 11 million dollar request from Council? Or will it be pushed through during a special meeting? What a joke. ARE THEY BEING PAID????? (topic title edited) -- Edited by Joanne Pilchesky at 22:53, 2008-06-03

no where can you find a post from Nelson, before he apologizes for saying something he didn't say.... at least not while he was logged in as Nelson anyway LOL LOL