Sadly no, it was on our chumster site as well. I am sick about it, as we had saved it there for the purpose of not letting Joey slime out of it later. Who could have forseen chumster going out of business.


I am truly sorry.

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 00:12, 2007-04-18

Well Ducky I should have predicted that, even though we couldn't get the original postings, the jerks at DD would resort to their old ways. This is basically what they were saying about Judy's grandchild on the last board. The paternity of the child.

Hammer Posts: 24 Date: Tue Apr 24 8:40 PM, 2007 Views: 49

Quote | Reply RE: If Chick's can break the law Judy, why can't your grandson's father? Here's how I see it, if Gatelli wanted to keep this man incarcerated for as long as possible to keep him from his baby, then she was easy to control. When the mayor wanted something, what the Hell, he only had to remind her how easy it was to let that guy out. Done deal. My question for someone who may know is: Besides being the father of the child, is he also the husband of Gatelli's daughter, or is this a child that was born out of wedlock? It just seems to me that considering Gatelli's public displays of betrayal to the tax payers, low self-esteem and lack of dignity, maybe the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. You can learn about parents by learning about their children, and vice versa. In my mind, the husbandless daughter and Judy's immoral character well known now, it seems that household breeds unethical and/or immoral character. Is that what we're voting for in Joe Gatelli, the same thing we got from Judy Gatelli? The answer seems obvious. Also, is this the same daughter who got the job at NEIU?

i take that back, this apost is the new low at DD, i really hope that they remove it soon, because libel or slander or whatever, is alive and well on that board, judys daughter/s are not public officials, i'd have to say that they are going to have a strong case, if this nonsense keeps up.

Disgusting, filthy trash. I'm not related to the Gatelli's and I don't know them socially, but reading that makes me want to....well, never mind.

PeeWee...if you are reading this, please register here and PM me. I would love to tell you directly just what kind of human being I think you are.

These people are scum.

Proud of your peeps there Janet????


-- Edited by Agamemnon at 21:53, 2007-04-24

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Paul wrote:

---

ETA: Pilchesky has edited the post. Doesn't change the fact that he's the leader of a bunch of ignorant, rumor mongering dirtbags.
_______________________________________________________

Too little too late. Good job on grabing that post before it got "sanitizied". I hope someone gets the information to the Gatelli's that it is posted here "unedited". Both posts are a problem for the crew at DD and I notice they didn't edit the first one. I also notice that they didn't do as we do "publicly" admonish the poster to post nothing else like that again. Interesting!!

Yeah, Pilchesky sanitizes it, about an hour and a half later...just long enough for a large group of toadies to read it, giggle and move on. He's acting like a Jr High School girl now...put the rumor out there, wait for the response, and then come back...damage done...and say "oh, I was just kidding".

Nice try douche-bag.


-- Edited by Agamemnon at 06:19, 2007-04-25

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

OOOOO what fun!! Now they are posting names of NON-PUBLIC figures this just gets better and better.What a bunch of low-life dirtballs. I can't wait for the lawsuit. This one WON"T be filed by Joey and WILL have merit.

Under Dohertys thumb Posts: 18 Date: Wed Apr 25 8:03 AM, 2007 Views: 129	Quote | Reply RE: If Chick's can break the law Judy, why can't your grandson's father? It is well known is many circles in south side that Gatelli has been wanting little Jacob's father out of his life permanently. He ultimate goal is to have the child to herself and has often verbalized she wants the child's name changed to Gatelli. That might not be such a good idea given what Gatelli's conduct has done to her name. For me, anyone who intentionally acts to drive a wedge between a child and a parent is the lowest of the low. When that child is deprived of seeing his parent, he is usually deprived of seeing the parent's family, also, so in this case, this little boy is exposed only to the Gatellis. It doesn't get much more cruel than that under any circumstances. Gina Gatelli, Judy's daughter, and her son Jacob, probably need to get away from the Judy's control and make her own decisions. Gina should move out and think independently of Judy, who is doing nothing more than trying to cover up what appears to be some pretty horrible parenting. We see this kind of serious dysfunction all the time where a dysfunctional mother raises a dysfunctional child who has a baby out of grossly irresponsible sexual behavior and then the mother comes to the rescue just to cover up that she was at fault in the first place because of the horrible parenting. None of this surprises me after see what Gatelli is all about as a councilwoman, none of it. I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't more, and then more after that. I've heard rumors that some time ago Gatelli was involved in a forster care program where a child was taken from her and she was removed from the program. The rumor continued that Judy had taught the child to use very vile language. Not a weak rumor, either!!
Michele Strausser Posts: 4 Date: Wed Apr 25 8:14 AM, 2007 Views: 110	Quote | Reply RE: If Chick's can break the law Judy, why can't your grandson's father? I know that Judy would like nothing more than tohave the father out of her grandsons life, that is why I am fighting the jail issue. I know Gina would never allow the last name change. I did not want to post their names for their sake, remember, Gina and Jacob had nothing to do with this, and YES if she truely loves Jacobs father (please do not post his name for safety sake) then she needs to stand up to Judy and make her feeling known. And SHE NEVER, NEVER, NEVER was involved in foster care program. Gina has been nothing less thana great mother....she involves Jacob in his other grandparents lives every weekend. I hope she will continue after all of this. I think we need to get back to the initial intent here, not to hurt Gina, but get justice for Jacob's dad. All he wants is to see his dad. I hope to be able to help him do that. __________________ Michele Strausser
Traditional apathy Posts: 37 Date: Wed Apr 25 8:17 AM, 2007 Views: 106	Quote | Reply RE: If Chick's can break the law Judy, why can't your grandson's father? If you think Gatelli is a Hitler at Council meetings, you should see her at Camp Gatelli. You see how meek Joe Gatelli is, that's no act. He's actually afraid of her in my most humble opinion. Gina should pack it up and start her own life not under the thumb of Judy. The child deserves to know both parents, and both parent's families. From what I've seen of Gatelli, she should be incarcerated. Switch places, put the brainwasher in the cell and take the brain abused out. Chances are that if Gina and this young man were given an opportunity to make it on their own with Judy's interference, it would probably work, it usually does as soon as you take the manipulating grandparent out of the equation. This is a young man who has made some mistakes, but we have all skinned our knees in life. He's doing time for the social mistake, paying his debt to society. He shouldn't be given a painful life sentence by Judy Gatelli as a discarded parent, it's inhuman. Would Judy have let anyone do that to her? Did she go two years without seeing any of her children? She doesn't know that pain or she wouldn't be doing this.
Under Dohertys thumb Posts: 18 Date: Wed Apr 25 8:24 AM, 2007 Views: 98	Quote | Reply RE: If Chick's can break the law Judy, why can't your grandson's father? The foster care rumor involved Judy, not her daughter. I'm very good friends with a gentleman who gave me the information. The story was that Judy and other foster parents appeared for a get together at Nay Aug and the children, who were latino, were all asked to show how much English they had learned. What came out of the mouth of the latino girl under her care was less than appropritate. Far less.
Of mice and men Posts: 13 Date: Wed Apr 25 8:28 AM, 2007 Views: 90	Quote | Reply RE: If Chick's can break the law Judy, why can't your grandson's father? Michele, the best thing you can do for this man is to release his name here, and contact Mr. Pilchesky and give to him all of the documents related to the matter. No question, as public documents, he'll post them. That shines the light on what has happened here. Exposure here might make his prison life much safer because they know whatever happens will become public, very public. Shove it under the DD light, it has worked miracles in this city already.
Sue Posts: 38 Date: Wed Apr 25 8:37 AM, 2007 Views: 74	Quote | Reply RE: If Chick's can break the law Judy, why can't your grandson's father? I'm sorry for what has happened to Judy Gatelli's daughter and grandson, and don't want to comment on that. It's none of my business, and should be none of anyone else's. But the bigger and more important question here is what part has Judy Gatelli played in all of this? If none, okay. If a supportive one for her daughter and grandson, good. If she's been interfering, coercive, manipulating and oppressive to her daughter and grandson's emotional needs, then I want to know about those malicious qualities, since the old adage says it all.... IF SHE CAN DO THAT TO HER FAMILY, SHE CAN DO THAT TO ANYONE!!!
Newsroom Posts: 46 Date: Wed Apr 25 8:40 AM, 2007 Views: 68	Quote | Reply RE: If Chick's can break the law Judy, why can't your grandson's father? Put it out there. It's the light that they fear. That's what DD is more than anything else. Make the judge known, and any relationship he has with Gatelli. Blow the lid right off it. By putting any documents up, others can see them and might know something that can help you, or recognize something that was done wrong.
To your health Posts: 13 Date: Wed Apr 25 9:32 AM, 2007 Views: 6	Quote | Reply RE: If Chick's can break the law Judy, why can't your grandson's father? I'd like to know if he's suffering harsher punishment than the next defendant because he's the father of Judy's grandson and she is interested in keeping him from seeing the child. Isn't there a Family Court history here? It's a sensitive issue of a personal nature, but if he's being held longer for the sake of making Gatelli happy, that's something the public should know.

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 01:13, 2007-04-26

Court Watchdog
Posts: 16
Date: Wed Apr 25 2:40 PM, 2007
Views: 39
Quote | Reply
RE: If Chick's can break the law Judy, why can't your grandson's father?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As docketed:

Jeana Gatelli vs. Ryan Loch No. 2003-CV-41155

Custody Action - Judge Harhut

As of Feb. 20, 2004 the parties had joint custody.

(2) The father shall have visitation from Friday at 5:00 pm to Saturday at 5:00 pm., Sunday from 12:00 pm to 5:30 pm and Wednesday from 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm.

On April 22, 2005, full custody was awarded to Jeana Gatelli - ( Judge Corbett)

**********Please Please Please someone tell me what THIS HAS to do with anything, Her daughter is NOT a public official and neither is the child, I do know the Gatelli's and they are wonderful people. They supported that little boy, when the father was not paying child support....FACT He was thrown in jail a few time for not paying child support FACT....He was arrested for possession of marijuana and other illicit drugs.......FACT That is why the daughter was awareded full custody FACT.....He did get release to go to rehab and went back to using drugs FACT He was arrested again for DUI and reckless driving........FACT...that is one thing you will not get across the hall is FACTS that are True Thanks for letting me vent, thei4r daughters do not deserve the way that they are being portrayed.....

justducky wrote:

---

i take that back, this apost is the new low at DD, i really hope that they remove it soon, because libel or slander or whatever, is alive and well on that board, judys daughter/s are not public officials, i'd have to say that they are going to have a strong case, if this nonsense keeps up.

---

Ducky my dear ... this is not a New Low at DD this actually is the same old low at DD and one of the reasons PD need to be created. We all came together in this place because of the wicked ways of the DD posters ... we were banned because we spoke out against what they were doing ... see if you don't agree with them (Joe and Joanne) then they ban you ... because they want to give the appearance that all of the city of Scranton is on the same side ... oh occassionally they let someone post who does not agree ... as long as that person doesn't get out of hand ... Our Paul and Art have both been banned 3 times each. Impressive guys ... I have been banned twice ... etc.

This is nothing new ... but it is very important when you find postings like this ... to preserve them ... you never know when you may need them.

Lus,

I am thrilled that you are getting this stuff over to Judy Gatelli. This nonsense needs to be exposed to the light of day for what it truly is: filth. Pilchesky can hide all he wants behind 'Free Speech', but in the end he will discover that speech isn't, in fact, always free.

To quote the late, great Dr. Hunter S. Thompson:
"You buy the ticket, you ride the ride."

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

You hit the nail right on the head, LUS anyone can be a dad, but it takes a specia person to be a father.