I'm just throwing this out there, we seem to have most of them figured out anyway.
Janet Evans--Not A Dumb Blond; Flower Child Bill Moran--Nobody Nancy Krake--Bo Peep, (PD's very own) ShariLewis Kay Garvey--City Haul James Burch--Jimbu 15 Sam Patilla--Cyberlion Les Spindler--John Bulwer; DeerParkerLumber; LES IS MORE Jim Davis -- Antisystemicmovements MaryAnn Wardel -- MAW Fay Fanus -- aquamg Dave Evans --Idon'tdrinkthekoolaid, dingo8mydobee John Letwinski (sp?) -- Johnny Rotten, member of the Lo(a)D, John (picking on kids) Joe Pilchesky -- PR Man, Pilcheskys Brain on Drugs Joanne Pilchesky ---Princess Leah
Add on if you'd like.
-- Edited by His Girl Thursday at 11:40, 2007-04-03
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 05:10, 2007-04-05
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 05:43, 2007-04-09
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 05:47, 2007-04-09
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 05:48, 2007-04-19
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 05:39, 2007-06-13
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 09:48, 2007-07-05
If you're going to have an enemy, he might as well be as predictable as the day is long.
I've reviewed the last 50 posts, and my staff is going to review the last 500 over the next three days, one by one.
I ban posters all the time, and not a day goes by that I don't have to edit something for clarity or a typo, I already have a huge lawsuit against the State Police and the DA's Office from the last episode of poor judgment attacking my site.
There is a laundry list of constitutional and civil rights violations that I can file one at a time, which I'll do, and your lawyers can spend their days fighting them in both federal and state court.
Joe Pilchesky wrote: I already have a huge lawsuit against the State Police and the DA's Office from the last episode of poor judgment attacking my site.
Gee... do you think they will be as sucessful as all the others?
I can go looking for motives for the public attack on me even before I file all of the lawsuits. What I don't like, and what really, really annoys me is when I'm counted out when I wasn't even in the ring.
Joe Pilchesky wrote: I can go looking for motives for the public attack on me even before I file all of the lawsuits. What I don't like, and what really, really annoys me is when I'm counted out when I wasn't even in the ring.
So your suing for an outrage? Are you saying that we are infringing on your right to have a reveloution? I'm not understanding what it is you are trying to say here. Please clarify.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Thank you for coming out of the woodwork, showing your true colors, and such exposure has always been the purpose of this movement. I personally want to thank you for your public loyalty to Mayor Doherty, our notorious, corrupt thief.
Joe I understand that I'm off topic here but ... I'm going to ask this of you anyway ... there was a threat to Darth Art that was made on your board and well you treated it as a joke and I was just wondering why? There is a topic that addresses this issue ... but if you like you can answer in this thread. It's your choice.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I don't know who said it, but whoever said it knew what they were talking about. Of course, we thank all of those who have adopted us as their place to go to express themselves and to get information regarding the recent outrage over the cameras, as well as the well documented corruption of this mayor and his gang of cronies.
I also promised Art to contact the writer and ask him to tone it down.
Joe Pilchesky wrote: Thank you for coming out of the woodwork, showing your true colors
And I want to thank you for showing your true colors also. Through your posts you have shownthat the last person you really are is our little Joey. I was hoping you would post a few so I could determine that for certainty, and now I have done so. If you want to impersonate someone you should really do your homework, because you failed miserably at this attempt.
Very good point you raise. I'll clarify, as well I should. I don't speak for the citizens of Scranton on Constitutinal and Civil rights violations. I can only speak for myself, and I only want to speak for myself.
Joe Pilchesky wrote: Thank you for coming out of the woodwork, showing your true colors, and such exposure has always been the purpose of this movement. I personally want to thank you for your public loyalty to Mayor Doherty, our notorious, corrupt thief.
Your welcome honey ... glad you like what we are doing here. I am sorry to see that you feel that way about the Mayor ... but to each his/her own.
This was not started if you remember because of what was written about the Mayor though ... it was started because you all stuck your noses into the personal business and made a private family issue very public ... and the fact that you banned users that spoke out against that ... depriving us of our freedom of speech. You claimed that you were the champion of free speech ... and well only if the people speaking agree with you ... so that is how this place was born ... I don't know the circumstances of the banning of the rest of the members on this site ... but I'm sure that it is a similar story ...
I would like to say ... and should have said this earlier ... but welcome to Pilchesky Deceit we are happy and proud to have you as a member.
I have sent you an e-mail asking that you stay within the boundaries of our Rules of Conduct ... and explaing what happens when you choose to ignore the rules ... and well now all I have to say is WELCOME and HAPPY POSTING!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Joe Pilchesky wrote: I don't know who said it, but whoever said it knew what they were talking about. Of course, we thank all of those who have adopted us as their place to go to express themselves and to get information regarding the recent outrage over the cameras, as well as the well documented corruption of this mayor and his gang of cronies.
I also promised Art to contact the writer and ask him to tone it down.
Well here it is so your memory can be refreshed as to who said it and what was said:
RE: Fanucci on her knees - qualifications in pictures DarthArt wrote: Both of the above threads are lower than low.Edit that for clarity. What's lower than low is your pathetic contribution to this forum. You have Nazi in your words, the ideals of an infidel and betrayer to your neighbor. Many would be pleased, and none greater than I, if you dropped dead within the hour and had your body cremated to be used for cinders in the mayor's driveway. At least you'd serve some purpose dead, you do nothing as a living soul. You've yet to post one good thing that would help anyone. You're not even a first class pain the ass, but a poorly written idiot with no grasp on the spirit of true Americanism. You're a Nazi, first and foremost, anti-American to the core. Do us all a fovor, would you? Blow your brains out some time this fine evening so we can all sleep better knowing you won't return with your Nazi-woman crying jag.
We took this very seriously over here ... over across the hall it was not taken seriously at all ....
RE: Fanucci on her knees - qualifications in pictures What's lower than low is your pathetic contribution to this forum. You have Nazi in your words, the ideals of an infidel and betrayer to your neighbor. Many would be pleased, and none greater than I, if you dropped dead within the hour and had your body cremated to be used for cinders in the mayor's driveway. At least you'd serve some purpose dead, you do nothing as a living soul. You've yet to post one good thing that would help anyone. You're not even a first class pain the ass, but a poorly written idiot with no grasp on the spirit of true Americanism. You're a Nazi, first and foremost, anti-American to the core. Do us all a fovor, would you? Blow your brains out some time this fine evening so we can all sleep better knowing you won't return with your Nazi-woman crying jag.I feel threatened by the tone of this post. I am fearful for my life. May I be assured of protection of my anonimity in no uncertain terms by the board administrator?
RE: Fanucci on her knees - qualifications in pictures DarthArt wrote: What's lower than low is your pathetic contribution to this forum. You have Nazi in your words, the ideals of an infidel and betrayer to your neighbor. Many would be pleased, and none greater than I, if you dropped dead within the hour and had your body cremated to be used for cinders in the mayor's driveway. At least you'd serve some purpose dead, you do nothing as a living soul. You've yet to post one good thing that would help anyone. You're not even a first class pain the ass, but a poorly written idiot with no grasp on the spirit of true Americanism. You're a Nazi, first and foremost, anti-American to the core. Do us all a fovor, would you? Blow your brains out some time this fine evening so we can all sleep better knowing you won't return with your Nazi-woman crying jag. I feel threatened by the tone of this post. I am fearful for my life. May I be assured of protection of my anonimity in no uncertain terms by the board administrator?Darth, I assure you that your identity as Mayor Doherty is safe with me.
Just kidding. You're safe, like all others. I don't see any direct threat, it's only a contrasting opinion of perhaps how you'd better serve the purposes of civic mindedness. Take it with a grain of salt. I don't agree with "V", I think you serve a hearty purpose on this forum. Where would we be without a little stirring antagonistic warfare. You can appreciate the sincerity, I'm sure. However, since you feel that your life is threatened, (not sure how) I have contacted the poster "V" and advised him/her to lighen up a little. He/she doesn't post often, but when he/she does, it's usually colored in revolutionary passion - sometimes compassion, but not necessarily in your case. Just hang on tight, my friend, we're all just getting warmed up. Having fun yet?
I think that Joe Pilchesky should have taken this a bit more seriously ... since the member Darth Art expressed to him that well ... he was feeling threatened by the poster ... but again special rules for special people over at Doherty Deceit.
I am going to say this ... I have to agree with my members and say that I do not believe that you are Joe Pilchesky. Just a feeling ... but if you are wanting to be him ... well God Bless you ... you have picked a hell of a role model.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Joe Pilchesky wrote: Very good point you raise. I'll clarify, as well I should. I don't speak for the citizens of Scranton on Constitutinal and Civil rights violations. I can only speak for myself, and I only want to speak for myself.
I agree that you are not the voice of all citizens of the City of Scranton ... but on your website you claim to be ... and you are always spouting off about the freedom of speech being very important to you ... but you my friend are the biggest offender when it comes to denying people the right to the freedom of speech. You often speak for everyone ... at least you claim that you are speaking for the entire city ... (even though there are many who want younot tospeak for them) so ... you have clarified nothing ... which leads me to belive as other posters here believe ... You my dear are not Joe Pilchesky ... you are dancing around the issue like a politician ... Joe tells you exactly what is on his mind ... he does not dance around ... I don't agree with him most of the time ... ok just about all of the time ... but I do have to give him that ... he has his convictions and makes no bones about his thoughts and beliefs on a particular subject .... You are not Joe Pilchesky if that is what you want... you are a poor imitation! But keep that name ... and post what you like .... within the rules!
Happy Posting!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
You're free to think what you want, I won't beg you to realize who you're dealing with, you'll find out the hard way. I sincerely hope everyone understands that I absolutely must maintain an independent posture, since at any time, for whatever reason, I may launch an attack, and I don't want to hear from anyone that I should or should not have based upon any affiliation with anyone politically, or through advertising, even if it seems harmless. I like shooting first and asking questions later, if that helps you to understand.
I don't think I want to understand ... you and I are cut from different cloths. I don't go out of my way to hurt people ... never did ... never will. I will tell you this though we are not going to back down here ... threaten us with lawsuits all you want ... if that's what your threat was in your second post ... you can sue me if you wish ... you may win ... more than likely you won't ... you made yourself as much of a public figure as each and every member sitting on the dias ... by launching your site and giving your name and address ... I however made a choice to keep my identity from you and your little cult following ... and I will remain unknown to you.
Here is what I think ... you are here being as polite as polite as can be ... on some sort of fishing expidition for the DD people ... you think you can gain some trust over here ... and we will fall in line ... well you brought it to the wrong place ... these members are free thinking individuals ... we know how we feel about different things ... Some of us are what you all at DD call Doobees and there are a few who are not ... here we discuss issues ... we do not attack those who think differently than we do ... and I don't know about the rest of the posters here ... but I am not a very trusting soul. I am not as gulable as you think I am ... I welcome your views whomever you may be.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I'm not an expert on writing styles, but the above postings don't seem to be the same style employed by serial plantiff Joe Pilchesky. Mind you, we know that there are actually two Pilchesky writing styles:
1. His typical style, evidenced in most postings. I'm not knocking the guy, as he isn't a terrible writer, as least as far as I am concerned. However, you have to take that comment within the context of all DD posters; for example, compared to Granma, the Pilchesky is a regular T.S. Eliot.
2. His 'enhanced' style, when he gets professional help with his sentence structure & language (Classic Example: His 'defense' of not allowing free speech on DD, despite the fact that the site is advertised as a place where, you guessed it, free speech is allowed).
So I suggest we name this one 'Faux' Pilchesky. Seems to fit.
Oh, and Faux Pilchesky: Maybe you haven't taken the time to really read the postings here, so some confusion is understandable. However, let me spell something out for you: Many of us aren't so much pro-Chris Doherty as we are anti-DD/LoD Goons. Don't believe me...then simply pose a sane, rational question to the group about the Mayor.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Well said Ag ... that was the point that I was trying to make in my post ... however ... I did not make it very clear ... Thank you!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
"I like shooting first and asking questions later, if that helps you to understand."
So what you are saying is that you are really a careless, ego-maniac who doesn't give a f&^k about anyone but themself? Oh, yourself and Janet Evans.
Come on now, you can do better than that...your postings so far are like dialogue out-takes from Robert Duvall's character (Col. Kilgore) in Apocalypse Now. How about some logic? How about some reasoning?
Oh, one more thing. Maybe if you weren't busy with your serial-plaintiff business, you'd understand that many of us here are not so much pro-Chris Doherty as we are anti-DD/LoD Goons.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 15:35, 2007-03-31
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
In another Thursday or two, the crony tide will recede and the real voters will take over, right back at it, asking questions and reconfirming that Gatelli is a corrupt, lying, backstabbing, two-faced betrayer.
Enjoy your free speech, that's all you have as both tool and weapon to defend against government. There is such a thing as too late, so if you know something, speak up now. That's the purpose of our Constitution. This country was born and raised on the revolutionary spirit, and that's the only thing that will keep it honest. Use your rights that so many others died to protect.
His Girl Thursday wrote: Are we seriously going to let this arse be an arse over HERE?
Probably, because I don't think he can help being an arse where ever he is,I think he was born that way. Maybe thats why he likes Little Miss Jan (you know the person he knows but who claims not to know him) she is, after all, a major a**hole so they kind of go together.
I put this post up not because it's particularly interesting but because there is one word in the post which makes me certain this is little miss Jan. Only a very few people would remember to put a (') AFTER the (s) in speakers as it is used in that sentence.It is both plural and possessive (speakers) is plural but (speakers' time) is both plural and possessive. So basically the people who tend to remember those pesky little rules of English are.......................
NotADumbBlonde Posts: 145 Date: Sat Mar 31 3:00 PM, 2007 Views: 135
RE: Their attempt at making McGoof electible!!! Please remember that McGuff, Doherty's relative, was the one who MOVED TO REDUCE SPEAKERS' TIME FROM 5 TO 3 MINUTES.WANTED THE CAMERAS CUT.HAS VOTED FOR NOTHING IN THE PUBLIC'S BEST INTERESTS.HE MUST BE REMOVED!