Well here is a poster who has calmed down quite a bit ... it's not quite the same without Anti ranting about the ICN and calling people all kinds of racist names ... but I must admit ... I like it this way much better ... but alas it will not last.

Antisystemicmovements', '', this, 0);">Antisystemicmovements



Posts: 500
Date: Sun Feb 25 9:37 PM, 2007
Views: 87
Quote | ReplyRE: Roads covered at 6:45, still no DPW!

---

DPW came by and salted at about 9:00PM. I'm waiting for someone to dig out the closest fire firehydrant.

__________________
The ICN love Notre Dame football, Syracuse Basket Ball, St. Patrick's Day, beer and, of course, their beloved children. However, they love their property value more.
Why wait ... go out there and dig the damn thing out yourself Anti ... but I guess that won't work because if you do that ... well then who the hell will you all have to blame if something happens and well you can find the hydrant ... that's just not fun for your group now is it.
Oh and Anti ... it's not the DPW's job to dig them out ... I do believe that it's the Fire Departments responsibility as they know or should know where they all are.  But all you guys want to blame the DPW for all the woes of this city ... so go for it ... we are all kind of getting used to it now.  Although I am quite surprised that you put out there that your streets was salted by 9:00 PM ... I just don't know how to start my day when I see you writing the truth about them ....

I peeked in across the hall with the link above. I gave up crazy for Lent, so I haven't been over there in a few days (thanks Lus). I think good old sister catherine has the right idea (now that she's slapped on that new wonder bra), but you know what -- the more they spew crazy and act the way they do, the more credibility they lose and the more ridiculous they make themselves sound/look. Sure they have people checking the site, but I think it is more to ridicule and laugh at the posters and try to guess who's who.

Across the hall dot com is like a train wreck --- you - just - can't - turn --- away. The same with the council meetings on channel 61. Shooor - you can change the channel, but you just have to look again. This week I was waiting for :::smooch::: Les Spindler and Lee (mister comb, himself) and Dan Hubbard, the LoD bad-boy with his scruffy beard and baseball hat. The ladies at DD must have given the style channel a call to do a make-over on their Danny. Hell, Fay even cleaned it up a little. She left her drool bucket (oops, I mean hankie)and Elmer Fudd hat at home this week. She must have known she was going to be on the tee vee. And Nancy told an even more detailed fairy tale instead of simply trying her best to make a point. Do we want them all to give us puppy dogs, fuzzy bunnies and sweet treats?? He|| no ----

Let them rant - let them rave - it is only helping OUR cause. Besides - it's free speech, right??

My favorite reply from that thread...

******************
Council rat', '', this, 0);">Council rat



Posts: 19
Date: Mon Feb 26 9:30 AM, 2007
Views: 869
Quote | ReplyRE: Wayyyyyyyy too much name calling here.

---

Isn't that what Judy does, stops others from speaking their minds? I can understand that a few posters get very upset and raucious, but that's a part of the human spirit. We're in a dogfight here with real human dogs. Capping the well eliminates it. Too bad for anyone who doesn't like expression, I don't like this mayor's expressions either. Our expressions are trying to reveal his expressions, right? March onward and say what comes to your mind. I will.

******************

A dogfight with real human dogs? Hmmmm....I think that phrase wins the OSCAR for dumbest thing written on DD (excluding anything written by Granma of course).

Anyway, what I think Council Rat is trying to say is that he/she can justify ANYTHING simply because Judy Gatelli will not allow the Fran Frani (the plural of Fay Franus) of the world to spout off at will. With that kind of logic I think anyone can justify anything.


-- Edited by Agamemnon at 19:17, 2007-02-26

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.