Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Seriously?? Who believes this?


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
Seriously?? Who believes this?
Permalink  
 


Joeyboy wasn't going to vote for her?? Really??? I guess ole Dr Candypants must have put the hammer down on all the obvious drooling over the Clariol Queen.....can you say pussywhipped? muhahhahahahah

 



Guru
circlestar.gif

Status: Offline
Posts: 12103
Date: Mar 6 1:03 AM, 2013
Printer Friendly

911 wrote:

Hitler would even say, "you have to be kidding me". It's not just these four people involved. Joe's been a staple in exposing corruption for years now. His fingers have been in almost every pie one way or another.

Too many pies, not enough fingers.

The single biggest power shift in city government was when the supermajority was voted in. Like Janet Evans and company or not, the election of the supermajority at least shut down the spending spree of the mayor. Take Joe Pilchesky out of that election and there would be no supermajority. I don't care how many miles Pat and Frank walked or how many doors they knocked on. Joe publicly annihilated Judy and Sherry for two years leading up to the election. Their ongoing political battles were always in the paper. Their legal battles were always in the paper. Joe won all of them.

The Evans supermajority doesn't see it that way. But, the truth is, even with the two years of bashing dished out to Judy and Sherry on a very public stage, they still didn't lose by that much. There's no question that at the minimum, Gatelli would have retained her seat without my public love affair with her. That's all that would have mattered. No supermajority.

I'm just wondering to myself what kind of help Janet Evans and company offered Joe now that he's under the knife for being the force that he was for them.

None. The only communications from the Evans camp were two very brief, very childish, sarcastic messages on my cell phone from her 12 year-old/husband, David. He's a man whose mouth is attached to a very dim-witted brain incapable of processing information into conclusions, logic, common sense or reason above the 8th grade level. Both communications pissed me off. That's just who he is. I think Janet has been an asset to the city, but she's missed a lot of time over her unfortunate disabilies. It's time for that old mare to consider pasture. Job well done for the most part, but moving forward our government leaders have to be fit to lead. She should respect the people enough to step aside until she recovers. She owes it to herself to retire. It's a bittersweet ending to a woman who likely had the best shot at becoming the first mayor, but in all honesty, her husband would have been a huge liability almost impossible to overcome. Yes, he's that offensive and he cares not who he offends. He has the mouth that just keeps on giving and giving, and it's all bad for her. I couldn't image him running around City Hall like it was his personal sandbox, and that's what it would have been for him. I wouldn't have voted for her myself for that reason alone. She's clearly not in charge of her life.



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Seriously?? Who believes this?
Permalink  
 


Joe Pilchesky vs. David Evans:  it's like the Joker vs. the Penguin.  Battle of the big mouths.  Two old men duking it out.  One fake tough vs. another.  Facsinating to watch, but does it really matter who wins?



__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
RE: Seriously?? Who believes this?
Permalink  
 


Dumb vs. Dumber.

__________________



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
Seriously?? Who believes this?
Permalink  
 


Recently snapped photo of Joe Pilchesky and David Evans "settling it like men".

fight2.jpg



-- Edited by Agamemnon on Thursday 7th of March 2013 07:33:03 AM

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Seriously?? Who believes this?
Permalink  
 


stop insulting old guys Agam!! lol lol lol How whipped is old baldy to have to throw the Clariol Queen under the bus lol.....Maybe Steffy threatened to withhold the little purple pills lol lol



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Seriously?? Who believes this?
Permalink  
 


Maybe Dr Candypants got tired of wearing that blonde wig to bed.



__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard