The administration of my message board is whipping into a frenzy. I have proof that the administration of the site is being done from two other IP addresses that are not mine. In fact, sometime this morning, an Administrator signed on and deleted and edited my password and changed the configuration of the site, during the time that Joe and Stephanie were at an emergency hearing in family court regarding a request for visitation for this coming weekend.
It wasn't me, and I documented that, however, another admin signed in and deleted the comments, as quickly as I was responding.
Last October as I drove into my driveway at my house on Sunset St. in Scranton, I saw that something was not quite right. There was an empty space under the carport where my 1992 Chevy Pickup truck used to be. I emphasize the word MY because it has been titled in my name since I bought it in 1992.
Joe was home, so I asked him what happened to the truck, and he said that Jim Williams towed it off the property and paid him cash for it. I then filed a police report, which is attached. I showed the Scranton police the title, the insurance card, and the registration papers.
I see a defamation suit coming from the Williams camp.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
For those out there who might have an interest in fiction that is self-adoration in nature, contact a publisher with your ambitions.
For the record, Mr. Eric Turoc and a dozen other IT savvy people have been extremely supportive over the years helping me to fend off almost daily attacks to infect my computers and steal vital information. Collectively, they have been human firewalls that have kept your free speech at your finger tips until Joanne Pilchesky hijaced it illegally and put all of you at risk by revealing hundreds of IP addresses.
Against the strong advice of these various IT experts, I allowed Joanne to stay on as a co-admin from the day she abandoned our home and marriage. I could have hijacked the site myself and moved all the content to a site where she had no authority. I didn't. I supported her ongoing participation even in marital betrayal over their warnings to not trust her. I was stupid. They saw something I didn't see and we all paid a dear price for it when her true colors showed up. With the changing of a few passwords on her part, almost 3,000 posters disappeared from the war on corruption. The most viewed thread has disappeared again, Kids-for-Kash, a thread to the benefit of helping kids escape abuse, and she removed it. What kind of sick mind does that?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Gee ERic keep working those mad computer skills and remember to keep your Tuesdays free...
And BTW you Outed yourself as JOey BOy's glorified teckie over a year ago and didn't even realize it, glad your part of team JOey. Sat hi to Gammie for me.
Post Info
TOPIC: To Eric and Stephanie about the administration terms of this site:
To Eric and Stephanie about the administration terms of this site:
This is Joe signing in as Joanne using Stephanie's body to think like EricTuroc.
Joanne has disabled the link to get to the Administration Panel so when I sign on as the Administrator I cannot get to the Panel to reinstate poster's accounts that she repeatedly deletes, among other things. On top of that, I cannot stop the impermissible posting under "anonymous" by putting the security levels back where they belong. Also, I cannot restore the Kids-for-Kash topic without getting into the Admin. Panel.
It's mind-boggling that this is the same woman who once stood side-by-side with me years ago fighting tooth and nail against corruption to provide the only source of free speech in this part of the world. Now, she goes to any length within her authority to sabotage it to her pleasure. Somehow, it's justified in her mind. Who'd have thunk?
I'll have to contact Sparklit to get the link reestablished and bring this up before Judge Nealon along with all the other anti- free speech abuses she's imposed upon more than half of the members here.
There's a light at the end of the tunnel. I'm hoping it's a short tunnel.
-- Edited by Joanne Pilchesky on Monday 30th of April 2012 04:55:24 PM
Joanne has removed the Kids-for-Kash topic........again, and in addition to that...
This is Eirc:
FYI: To all members:
As Joe Pilchesky told me, I am only following orders. I will delete, ban, edit and moderate this site as I see fit while he is away for the weekend with Stephanie Tarapchak.
I have been given permission to do this by Joe Pilchesky, but I don't need his permission because I am an internet technician with advanced training and skills.
I made a mistake by deleting the Kids for Kash topic because Joanne Pilchesky had me so rattled by revealing my identity.
I have been helping Joe with the admin of this site, and I know you all trust me. I am at the public library now, but Joe is at my home, and I don't know which computer he is using.
I'm trying to calm Joe down, but you know what he's like when he loses control.
He changes mine every other day. How dare I bash the all powerful Kevin Muffy and question the relationship between him, his staff and Joe. So is the money being funnelled to Joe through Joe's IT Guy? This one will be gone and I will have my password changed shortly.
__________________
God
Date: Apr 30 4:19 PM, 2012
I want you to build an ark. Get some wood build it 300 cubits by 80 cubits by 40 cubits. When you get that done go out into the world and collect all of the animals in the world by twos, male and female, and put them into the ark.
RE: To Eric and Stephanie about the administration terms of this site:
And, to Eric, Joe and Stephanie, you will not get away with changing my password and posting under my name in an effort to discredit me.
I have accumulated hundreds of screen shots and affidavits from those members whose posts were edited, deleted, and manipulated. All signed and witnessed to be presented to Judge Nealon. In addition to having an expert witness and website message board computer programmer agree to show up in court.
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
Is that why you removed the thread about Jimmy Williams and you stealing my car? Because I'm a betrayer to the cause?
Is that why you removed the thread about how many names post from your same IP? Because dozens of them are at the library when you are?
Is that why you deleted the entire forums and accused me of doing it when you didn't like that people were questioning you about statements you've made?
Or maybe you just never thought that I was brave enough to admit the huge error in judgment I made when I met and married you.
Maybe you realized, after having an affair with Elaine DeLorenzo of the Scranton police during my criminal trial days, that you should have used that time wisely to help me get a lawyer.
Maybe you realized, that lying to me about Chris Cullen would eventually be made known public, and that you certainly couldn't have that happen.
Maybe you realized that after I locked you out of the house when you spent the night with Kelly Wallace of Peckville, that the truth someday would come out. You remember, the time you cried after you got caught.
Is that why you continue to suppress free speech rather than sue me? You know, because editing and deleting content doesn't make the truth go away.
You set me up. You took all my money and assets under the guise that your former wife took you for a financial ride and you had nothing. And so manipulated me into believing that you just needed a second chance in life.
In fact, you are a predator. You were looking for someone like me; to drain me of everything, including my relations with my family. Your emotional abuse of my son should be something that could put you behind bars for decades, but it's not yet recognized as such a crime.
God bless Stephanie. Of all the things she might deserve, she doesn't deserve to be inflicted with the blight called Joe Pilchesky.
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
It has come to my attention that you recently removed my 1992 Chevrolet CK2500 blue and white pickup truck from 819 Sunset St., Scranton, PA. This would be VIN# 1GCFC24K4NE219417 with license plate #YGH6689, and title # 45703037102 RI. Joe Pilchesky told the Scranton police that you towed it off the property sometime in late October or early November. That statement is recorded on Police Report 11-50625, dated November 21, 2011.
The truck had an existing valid title, which was titled in my name since the moment I purchased it new in 1992. Joe Pilchesky has never owned it, nor was it ever titled to him individually or jointly, nor was it awarded to him in a divorce settlement. I would like to know how you took legal possession of the truck in order to move my personal property off of my property at 819 Sunset St., which is also only titled in my name.
Although I don't owe anyone a reason for keeping the truck, you should know that my son has obtained his driver's license and we had planned to fix the truck for his personal use. My son has very fond memories of being in that truck with his Dad, who has passed away, and looked forward to keeping it as both his father and I promised our son he could have it. We now need a vehicle for him.
In light of the illegal activities surrounding the disappearance of my truck, it might be easier on everyone if we just replaced the truck with a vehicle that my son can drive, or, come to an agreement on appropriate value, or, restitution.
If I have contacted the wrong Jim Williams, and it is your son instead, I apologize, but I fully expect you to advise me if I have contacted you in error, since there is a potential for a false statement to have been made to the police. I am attempting to reconcile this amicably. Otherwise, we can let the insurance company and the Pennsylvania State Police handle it.
Please be advised that Joe does not represent me in this situation, and that he is not authorized to agree to, or negotiate anything on my behalf. I will wait 5 days after delivery of this letter to hear from you. You may contact me by telephone, by email, or by text.
Sincerely,
Joanne Ricci Pilchesky
joanne.pilchesky@gmail.com
570-840-9828
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I am in receipt of your letter dated Feb. 23, 2012, wherein you claim that I contracted with Joseph Pilchesky to sell my car. I did not contract with him, nor did I contract with Jim Williams Salvage and Surplus to do anything with my car. As you know, contracts consist of signed agreements, or proof of verbal agreements to which each party assents by conduct. Mr. Pilchesky was not given permission to sign my name for any business transaction, nor should any document required for the sale of my truck have been notarized with my signature or name on it.
Please forward to me proof of your claim, including a copy of the contract referenced by you, the salvage transfer documents, the payment of the money for the truck, and the receipt of the payment of the money, otherwise I’ll assume you are manufacturing material facts.
The Consumer Protection law relates to the business practices of Jim Williams Surplus, in that if he were removing my truck from my property under the guise of it being junk, he would have provided a service to me that would have been memorialized in writing under a document known as a contract. I should not have to guide you on the law relating to how salvage and junk dealers operate in accordance with taking a person’s vehicle without their notice, especially when it’s taken from a person’s private property.
I will reiterate that the truck was owned by me individually, purchased long before I was married to Pilchesky, and it was legally parked and stored on my private property, which is owned solely by me. It is a perpetration of a fraud upon me, as a citizen, that no law enforcement department will take action on this issue, since it clearly falls under fraud, and theft of movable property, which is a felony. Please explain to me why I should have to get a lawyer to do what tax dollars pay law enforcement to do?
The following is a brief recitation of what I found by searching online relating to laws governing the conduct of a salvage yard, which Mr. Williams operates. Please pay attention specifically to section (c).
2010 Pennsylvania Code
Title 75 - VEHICLES
Chapter 11 - Certificate of Title and Security Interests
1162 - Transfer to vehicle salvage dealer.
§ 1162.Transfer to vehicle salvage dealer.
(a)General rule.--Any owner who transfers a vehicle or a
salvage vehicle to a vehicle salvage dealer, as defined in
section 1337(c)(2) (relating to use of "Miscellaneous Motor
Vehicle Business" registration plates), shall assign the
certificate of title or salvage certificate to the vehicle
salvage dealer. A certificate of title or salvage certificate
for a vehicle transferred to a vehicle salvage dealer is exempt
from the requirements of notarization and verification by a
corporate officer.
(b)Certificate of title.--Upon transfer of a certificate of
title to a salvage vehicle dealer, the salvage vehicle dealer
shall immediately send to the department or an authorized agent
of the department either of the following:
(1)The assigned certificate of title attached to a form
prescribed by the department indicating that the vehicle is
to be designated as a nonrepairable vehicle. A copy of the
form shall be retained for record in accordance with section
6308(d) (relating to investigation by police officers). The
vehicle shall not be rebuilt, retitled or issued a
certificate of any kind.
(2)The assigned certificate of title with an
application for a certificate of salvage upon a form
prescribed by the department. The certificate of salvage,
when issued to the vehicle salvage dealer, shall have the
same effect as provided in section 1161(c) (relating to
certificate of salvage required).
(c)Vehicles with defective or lost title.--Any person on
whose property is located a vehicle which is a salvage vehicle
and which has a faulty, lost or destroyed title may transfer the
vehicle to a salvor or to a salvage program operated by a
political subdivision for removal to a suitable place of storage
or for scrapping, provided the salvor or salvage program
complies with the requirements of this section, except that the
report to the department that the vehicle is a salvage vehicle
shall be verified by the transferor of the vehicle instead of
the police department.
Cross References.Section 1162 is referred to in section
1161 of this title.
I’ve provided proof and a complaint that the truck was mine, legally stored on my property, and provided the law regulating that transaction, yet you don’t do anything. Nor does any other law enforcement agency that I’ve contacted. Could you please provide an explanation as to the need for the law? You are mistaken if you think that Jim Williams Surplus does not fall under the Consumer Protection Law. This situation clearly involves the alleged purchase of services by a consumer (me) for personal use (removing a vehicle from private property). If Mr. Williams based his business dealings on representations made by Mr. Pilchesky, then that is his mistake, and he can take recourse against Mr. Pilchesky for recovery.
Does it occur to you that Mr. Williams could do this hundreds of times a month on this small scale and produce hundreds of thousands of dollars from the resale of parts from vehicles such as this? He ships them all over the country and internationally, so what’s to stop him from continuing to do business this way? What if it was someone else’s car stored on my property and these two men did the same thing? Could they just get away with it because one of them claims that the owner gave permission to sell the car? Where are the checks and balances? Where is the application of law?
Yet when Jim Williams was the recipient and disburser of information that had a public official’s social security number on it, the District Attorney’s office made a huge publicity splash about it and filed charges against him. That was in the middle of an election however, so the influence of politics seems to determine whether or not the law is enforced apparently.
And so it is with Mr. Pilchesky’s unauthorized practice of law, where he is giving legal advice, preparing legal documents, advising clients on strategy and negotiating fees and compensation for certain results, yet no one will take action against him.
The fact that neither you nor any other agency is pursuing either of these men for charges relating to their collusion and conspiracy to defraud me is a testament to your apathy in our justice system, or your unwillingness to earn your salary.
Please give a copy of this letter to your supervisor. I’m forwarding it to all those I initially contacted about this complaint. I can be reached at the address below.
Sincerely,
Joanne Ricci
24B St. Albans Ave.
Newtown Square, PA 19073
570-840-9828
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I have also been banned ... or had my password changed ... no big deal ... they are not as entertaining as when Joanne was around ... she kept them on their toes across the hall.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.