Well David I am only going by what Mr. Pilchesky himself has put up on his site ... that he does not work and that DD is his job ... if I am wrong about that then it is Joe's own fault for my thinking the way I do about he and Joanne not working.
Our site ... I wouldn't say that I hate Pilchesky ... do I like him no ... but hate is a very strong word and well I don't know him well enough to say that I hate him ... I actually can't think of one person that I do hate.
And as for the hate ... between this site and Joe's site ... I think that it is non existent as all we really do is respond to their posts ... something that Mr. Pilchesky will not allow us to do at DD ... if he allowed me to have my opinion as is my right ... then this place would not exist. This is just a bunch of people who were denied the freedom of speech by Pilchesky ... you know that freedom that he holds so dear ... but only for people who agree with him.
As far as his style of writing ... well it would be like me trying to write under another name ... and forgetting that I say things like "Hello Pot this is Kettle" and using the dots that I love to use ... you can almost always tell when it's Joe ... because he will make a veiled threat and then try and cover that threat with the use of the words "politically speaking of course" ... and if you go back to the beginning of this thread and read it in it's entirety you will see how we came to the conclusion that Joe is posting under many different names.
The problem Joe has with the PD posters is simple ... we question him ... we don't blindly fall in line and accept what he says as gospel ... just like you don't accept what we say as gospel ... and you know what David there is nothing wrong with that ... you have a right to question us ... as we do you and Joe .... the difference here is you will not be banned for it.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
"Your site and theirskinda reminds me of the Janet hates Chris nonsense. Who's good? Who's bad"
BAD is blaming Mayor Doherty for a suicide...at Christmas Time, no less.
BAD is stating that Judy Gatelli kept someone in jail.
BAD is overt Anti-Semitism.
BAD is overt hate-mongering against people who happen to be both Irish and Catholic [read one of Anti's ICN posts and then substitue "black person" for "Irish Catholic"...now tell me if you still think it's benign]
BAD is is using Judy Gatelli's children and GRANDCHILDREN as a blunt instrument for bashing.
BAD is lewd sexual inuendo.
Really, do I have to continue? I'd suggest that asking "who's good, who's bad" is precisely the problem here. Some folks get lost in the world of "that's just Scranton politics for you" as they check their conscience at the door. Well, sorry, but no.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I carry my conscience with me ... I don't leave it at the door and let me tell you why ... because here at PD ... you are allowed to call us bad if that is your opinion ... at DD I was not allowed to question the false things that were being said ... and I knew that they were false ... and when I questioned them I was banned ... I was not able to ask questions as you are able to do here ... so I think that in and of itself makes this place good compared to the bad ... nobody is jumping all over you for your difference of opinion because you are doing it in a respectful manner ... which is leading to an open and honest disucssion ... how many times have you seen that across the hall?
We have only banned one poster from this site ... and that was because they were talking about stalking DPW workers ... that is an illeagle act and a clear cut violation of our rules of conduct ... we gave many warnings to the poster ... and then took a vote on banisment ... that does not happen across the hall.
I will tell you one more thing that is something that you will never see across the hall ... moderators ... and these moderators hold me to the same rules of the board that you are held to ... I have been edited ... and have even had posts deleted by moderators ... tell me now that we are bad ... I guess it's all just a matter of opinion ... you are entitled to yours as I am mine.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
On this one David I think you have to give me it all .... Joe does is not subject to editing ... unless he himself edits his own posts ... he bans people who don't agree ... not as much now as before but he still does it ... you can't have a different opinion across the hall ... if you do ... they slam on you and call you all kinds of unholy names .... so I think that you have to give it all to me on that post David.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
To answer dave's question yes I do believe they have this much time it is called an obsession.
Here is another and note the common gay theme....funny for a guy who pretends to be such a he-man he spends an awful lot of time thinking about gay sex. Makes me wonder.......
North Pocono thought the storm was over with DeFazio out the door, well paid to keep his mouth shut. Not the case at all. He left a mess behind and it's a mess with a paper trial. That's what Pilchesky is after and nothing more. With the whole truth about DeFazio coming out, the expansive coverup comes out with it. There were lots of people involved in protecting DeFazio from beginning to end and Pilchesky wants any ties of that protection that compromise Jarbola. Bottom line. It's all about Jarbola.The DA is currently at the top of Pilchesky's hit list. Higher than Doherty.
It's personal now. NP knows it. Pilchesky is going to carve up North Pocono into as many pieces as he has to until he gets what he wants.
Now here's an experiment for you David to prove the point Lus is making.
Go to DD and write a posting with the subject "Banned Posters", asking Joe why he claims to represent free speech but yet bans posters who disagree...with his free speech. Let's see:
1. How long it takes Joe to paste multi-paragraph disclaimer about how "free speech" doesn't really apply at his message board. 2. How long it takes his cronies to start bashing the crap out of you. I say Patilla will have something up in 3 hours...it may be unintelligible, but it will be posted quickly. 3. How long it takes Joe to ban your Janet-loving a$$ (and I mean that in a nice way) or threaten to ban you if you "cross the line" again.
Do that and then let's see if you don't give Lus 100% credit on this one.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 07:18, 2008-12-30
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Here is Joey-jerkoff talking to another new alias and an old one. Note as usual he has to use a sexual image. Note also the glorification of a picture of a terrorist.
Posts: 3941 Date: Dec 31 8:28 PM, 2008
Sling shot vs. sophisticated armed government forces This startling photo below, which appeared today on the front page of the Times-Tribune, shows a young boy, perhaps 14 - 15 years old, witha sling shot facing off against fully armed troops in Israel. The picture is stirring. The boy's eyes are fearless. Regardless of where his stone lands, it's nothing more than a spitball against a battleship, but there he is - out in the open - making his intentions known. Takinga stand. Risking his life to let one stone fly.
Here, just in our little patch of freedom we call Scranton, the most ruthless and corrupt politicians ever to have a strangle on our quality of life march right over the masses of adult men and women with nary a peep from any of them. With more constitutionally protected rights than any other people in the world at their disposal to arm themselves in protest, the men and women of Scranton are silent.
Part fearful? Part apathetic? Just fat? Too good of a life to worry abouta corrupt City Hall and Courthouse? 850 channels to choose from? Three cars in the driveway? Fast food and eating out all the time? Watching grown men play with a ball every Sunday afternoon? Lots of big fat pork bellies, but no guts in them. Lots of false bravado on a bar stool three times a week, but can't take 10 minutes to vote the corrupt out. The list could go onand on. The point is, Americans have truely forgotten how to be Americans, haven't they?
A moment ofcourage and heart displayed in this one child's act of defianceis sufficient to embarrass years of this city's apathetic adult population's conduct. It's confounding.Disturbing. UnAmerican.
It's time to have a good talk with the men in this city.
Where in the name of God are all the men in thistown?
Well said, Mr. Pilchesky. And you think that the Lynetts are the cancer of this town?
No, Sir. It's the people. They're really just a mass of cowardly, ethically dwarfed, stupid people.
Scranton is what it deserves to be. It can be nothing else but the laughing stock of Pa. and the country. The center of the political universe is what we're being told now.
What does that say about the political universe?Scary!!!!!!
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 22:19, 2008-12-31
Now there's an instance where wish the "RTK" laws applied.
Speaking of the Right to Know letters, I remember seeing this kind of thing before....it was when I was 12 and I got a new Italian 12 speed bike from Tom Taylors in downtown Scranton. Man did I ride the hell out of that. When you are that age and you get a new toy...oh, wait, bad example...Pilchesky is like 70 or something like that, right?
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Yes Agam at least.No fool like an old fool they say......
This is another one. Here Joey-jerkoff is trying to make others think someone really gives a rat's behind when he is in court again. Which they don't......oh well except for the court case in Erie.... alot of people are real interested in that one.
Wouldn't you wonder why they never bring the court case in Erie up .... even if they are not going to run with it ... whey aren't they wishing them luck ... they wish him luck every other time he goes to court ... why not this time?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
this is probably Edith because while she is dumb as a pile of rocks (being married to the jerk-off is prove positive for me) she is not nearly as offensive in her writing style as the bald ball-less one.
The problem is that the hiring process is not public. We don't get to see the applicants or learn anything about them. It's not that we would try to be a part of the decision making process because that would be too cumbersome, I understand that. But we should be able to know when the job is advertised, how many applicants applied, who they were, and who was hired.
Job applications which have personal information that the public is not privy to on them are not something that anyone is entitled to under the RTK laws ... and I don't know if they have the right to know who applied since they are not actual employees until they have been hired.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
And as we all know ... not every applicant is hired.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Here we have yet another alter ego from the great ball-less bald one. Notice the obligatory crude sexual reference in the form of a hand gesture in this reincarnation and the cheerleading he desperately needs daily.
It seems like a RTK letter is like sending out the plague in an envelope. No one wants to touch it. In my wildest of dreams I'd have never, never known how inept, corrupt and incompetent our government is without this site. Why would Stu Renda want to be made an ass out of in court? They know Pilchesky loves court.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 08:13, 2009-01-06
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 07:53, 2009-01-07
The criminal records are public documents and that's a public podium. Period. Marie needs to think about contacting Joe to file a federal action against council.
RE: Jimmy Connor's 22 yr old son is named Asst Zoning Officer...does he have a criminal record? I'll tell you what, Marie has her style and Hubbard has his, but between them they pounded the piss out of this Zack Connors hire. Nice work to them both.
There's two council candidates right that who would walk right in on the republican side. Maybe even on the democratic side.It's a shame neither one of them have announced any intention to run.
For shame, for shame. What's a crony to do in Scranton now with the Internet as aplayer? First, Jimmy flips to the dark side to get his drunken kid a job and then the drunken kid makes it front and center in the Political Center of the world, and then he quits.
Some genetics you got going there, Jimmy. Love it.
Hands down I think that Joes most disfunctional personality is his very own ... Joe Pilchesky ... I don't think that he could be more disgusting if he tried!
Gatelli: I want a raise to $20,000 and give the mayor another $40,000.00 a year, too - Next meeting Judy Gatelli wants a raise in pay to $20,000.00 a year for being a councilwoman. She also wants the mayor to get a nearly 100% increase in pay up to $90,000.00 a year. And, she believes that Rose Novembrino, who has paid everything and anything shoved under her nose, should be making $55,000.00 a year. Ya' gotta get it while the gettin' is good and no one knows better than Jude that her days as a councilthief are numbered.Nothing stands in her way, either. McGoff and Fanucci are already on board with it.Well, a lawsuit challenging it would stand in the way, but who's the fruitcake that's going to do that?
SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH............
Keep that under your hat, you didn't hear that here. I'm in enough trouble with Judy Gatelli the way it is. And if Sherry finds out she may not let me play with her chest anymore or get into her drawers.
He's a pig ... I wonder how Joanne feels when she sees what her husband writes about other women ... how much respect does he actually have for women ... NONE ... if he did respect women he would not write something like that ... Joe you are a pig ... and you must be dreaming about Sherry as you are always referring to her in this manner ... Are you going to return to your post and add "Politically speaking of course" ... What a PIG you are!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Yeah, ha ha ha, joe - we know you bought a chest of drawers from Sherri - and ha ha ha, you had a good chuckle as you tried to insinuate a sexual reference on your pitiful website - and ha ha ha , some of your little followers actually wanted to believe you actually copped a feel on the unsuspecting councilwoman. ewww ...
Many of his negative comments about quite a few persons of the female persuasion, were laughable, if not completely ridiculous, but sexual inuendo from that psycho is just plain creepy ... frikkin. ass. creepy !
He has now graduated from just your regular, run-o-the-mill wannabee counselor to "dirty old pervert". There's no place to go but UP, fella ...
Speaking of a lack of respect for women, note the following...note the use of the word "girl"...I'm sure that the woman in question is probably over say 12 years old.
Posts: 4004 Date: Jan 12 7:26 AM, 2009 Gilette has been loyal to which ever way the wind blows at City Hall. New mayor - new loyalty. Can't blame a girl for wanted to protect her job, although I believe she gets moved around a lot. Isn't she in the Controller's Office now, or I'm I thinking about the wrong girl?
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I unwittingly posted a remark about him saying " There's no place to go but UP" -- Boy was I wrong ...
Seems as though he's got yet another brand-spankin' new moniker "mayor something" or "something mayor" with a dd based picture of some old pervert and young "girl ". Typical true colors for the skanky old pervert that he has become. Yes folks, this is the kind of guy you want to place all your hopes and dreams in --
Personally, I'd pick family man Chris Doherty any day. He's got a loving and attractive wife, a group of well-mannered (and cute) children, a beautiful home and friends he can count on.
What do YOU have ? Well, you've got a wife who's about to be jailed for pilfering from her father, the few remaining pennies he had before he died; you've got ... what ... how many kids? ... who, I am sure are the product of learning by example in your "the world owes ME" mentality; a home that you ( as carpenter extraordinaire) seem to not be able to maintain and will always be in a constant state of renovation; and finally ... you surround yourself with the likes of Spindler, Franus, Evans, Evans, Quinn, oh yeah ... and Evans.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I'm not sure if this is Joe posting about Joe (or Edith having soldier fantasies), but it's pretty hillarious once you read it.
Freedom is not free Posts: 51 Date: Jan 19 8:36 AM, 2009 Joe Pilchesky is America's newest kind of hero - the Super Citizen - a selfless, sacrificing, in-your-face, get-it-done, won't-back-down, determined man of a will too strong for the machine to defeat, deter or intimidate.
The courts can't ignore that. Tom Munley, above all judges, can't ignore that. He's a Vietnam vet. He put his own life on the line in the name of freedom for people in a country far away.He watched mengo to their own slaughterfighting for freedom. I don't think he has to try too hard to bring that up in his mind. When Mr. Pilchesky appears before him he seesthe fighter. He sees the sacrifice. At this point what choice is there but to honor it? Doing the right thing here is the only thing to do for the kids.
When last I checked neither the fictional Rambo nor the real-life Bufford Pusser ever...
...beat up a sleeping drunk with a tire iron ...took a Little League to court ...sued people as a hobby ...used gross sexual inuendo as a means of intimidating people ...hid assets in his wife's name to avoid judgements (errr may not be such a good idea, come March)
...but then again I think "Freedom is not free" is more interested in fantasy than reality.
By the way, does anyone know if Pilchesky served in the military?
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.