Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: DD.com Identities


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Oh Aquamg is definetly Faye ... she pretty much attacked Amil Minora at Thursday's meeting ... stating the same things she just wrote ... and I do remember the egg timer she is talking about.

You may not have elected Amil Faye ... but here is the thing ... the Council hired him to replace Mark Walsh when Mark became ill ... he is there to advise the Council on points of law ... you don't have to like it Faye ... but that's his job and so he has to speak up.

I think you are a riot when you do your crazy little things ... best comedy in town ... Chris Barnes should hire you for the comedy Dojo ... anyway ... did I get off track ... I have to agree ... Aquamg is Faye!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 124
Date:
DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


midvalleyflash is NOT bill risse

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


VinceWhirlwind wrote:

midvalleyflash is NOT bill risse



Any thought on who midvalley flash is then if it's not Bill Risse? I have no clue either way as I barely know who Bill Risse is other than that he worked for county at one time.



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 124
Date:
DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


whomever it is they are right on the money!!!

__________________


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Looks liek we'll be confirming and making additions to this thread soon.


http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=65524&p=3&topicID=11860468&commentPage=1


Assuming the names and addresses given actually exist.


edited to make it a link :)

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 16:31, 2007-05-25

__________________



Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Fay just confessed to being aquamg- I forget who and am too lazy to look it up - but someone here called it!

aquamg
Posts: 155
Date: Fri May 25 3:52 PM, 2007
Views: 32
RE: Gatelli Countersues the Pilchesky's...

I absolutely would love to see all of us file a counter suit against Judy Gatelli--I do not like being called a terrorist-- Just lead me to the nearest law office where this can get started--We really need to do this- anyone interested

by the way Judy, this is
Fay Franus
327 Railroad Avenue
Scranton Pa--
your best friend!!



__________________

Make Jack pack!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


me me me I am so proud!! I got one right :)

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


You go girl (?) er...ummm...boy? Good call!

__________________

Make Jack pack!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Art Gordon wrote:

You go girl (?) er...ummm...boy? Good call!



:)) girl


Oh by the way Joey "sanitized" out Fay's name from this post but not before we preserved the post. Dang!! Need to be faster Joey. :)

Aquamg
Posts: 160
Date: Fri May 25 3:52 PM, 2007
Views: 712
RE: Gatelli Countersues the Pilchesky's...
I absolutely would love to see all of us file a counter suit against Judy Gatelli--I do not like being called a terrorist-- Just lead me to the nearest law office where this can get started--We really need to do this- anyone interested

By the way Judy, this is
Your best friend!!


-- Edited by Administrator at 01:12, 2007-06-01



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


How come nobody has anything to say when that assbag and the missus make unsolicited edits to their posts. If Fay wanted her name on the post, there it should remain - address and all. Well he just stomped all over her free speech, didn't he? Hmmm... too bad we couldn't just have stomped on her instead of her rights.

oops - was that threatening??




__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


His Girl Thursday wrote:

How come nobody has anything to say when that assbag and the missus make unsolicited edits to their posts. If Fay wanted her name on the post, there it should remain - address and all. Well he just stomped all over her free speech, didn't he? Hmmm... too bad we couldn't just have stomped on her instead of her rights.

oops - was that threatening??




I do not believe that was threatening at all Girl ...

I have to agree with you ... if someone wants to post something then who the hell is Joe Pilchesky to come along and change it ... he never takes down the threats ... so why take down the name and address of a poster who is more than happy to share with the world who she is.

It's not like nobody knew anyway!



__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Hi everyone. If I may interject on this thread, what threats are we talking about?

__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Girl was making a joke ... if you read an earlier post she stated:


His Girl Thursday writes:

How come nobody has anything to say when that assbag and the missus make unsolicited edits to their posts. If Fay wanted her name on the post, there it should remain - address and all. Well he just stomped all over her free speech, didn't he? Hmmm... too bad we couldn't just have stomped on her instead of her rights.

oops - was that threatening??



if you read the above post ... she made somewhat of a joke ...

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Paul,
I must commend you on your fine gum shoe reporting here. It must have taken you weeks to come up with this list. Especially the Jim Burch, Mary Ann Wardell and Fay Franus mystery names. How did you ever figure them out? You're good!




Janet Evans--Not A Dumb Blond; Flower Child
Bill Moran--Nobody
Nancy Krake--Bo Peep
Kay Garvey--City Haul
James Burch--Jimbu 15
Sam Patilla--Cyberlion
Les Spindler--John Bulwer; DeerParkerLumber; LES IS MORE
Jim Davis -- Antisystemicmovements
MaryAnn Wardel -- MAW
Fay Fanus -- aquamg
Dave Evans --Idon'tdrinkthekoolaid, dingo8mydobee
John Letwinski (sp?) -- Johnny Rotten, member of the Lo(a)D, John (picking on kids)
Joe Pilchesky -- PR Man, Pilcheskys Brain on Drugs


__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


I'm sorry for the confusion. I meant your post below.


I have to agree with you ... if someone wants to post something then who the hell is Joe Pilchesky to come along and change it ... he never takes down the threats ... so why take down the name and address of a poster who is more than happy to share with the world who she is.

__________________


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


I appreciate the sarcasm, lambchop, but it wasn't difficult, and I never claimed that they were earth-shattering. The point was, Joe claims to be so protective of his posters' identities that I figured I'd poke him with a stick and post them here.

If you're impressed, great. If not, that's cool, too. I'll still manage to get to sleep tonight.

Enjoy your visit.

__________________



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Hi Shari! Welcome to our board. :)

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Sorry for the sarcasm Paul, I can't help it sometimes. Please put up with me. I promise to bring something to this forum. I can probably bring some good, honest debatefor you.Thanks for the welcome!

__________________


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Hi Shari, welcome aboard.

Bring all of the wit and sarcasm you like. Leave the Pilchesky worship at home and we'll get along fine. Regardless, you'll find this site to be funny and informative, both light and serious at various times, and unless you do something completely illegal - free of editing.

Keep your eye on Paul. He's a witty one. (and I think he has a man crush on me)

__________________

Make Jack pack!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Oh Art!! I though you only had keystrokes for me?? I am crushed!! LOL LOL

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Thanks Art. I remember you from "across the hall".After reviewing many threads, I can see Paul is the firecracker here. I'll see what I can do to tame the wildbeast in him.

__________________


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


IHavehadenoughofhaters wrote:

Oh Art!! I though you only had keystrokes for me?? I am crushed!! LOL LOL



C'mon baby, you know you're the only one for me ( in a non-creepy, platonic, anonymous Internet posting kind of way). Besides, I can't help how Paul feels.



__________________

Make Jack pack!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Thank you I feel much better now! :)

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Lus?
I still didn't see what threats you were talking about. Can you fill me in?

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Girl was making a joke about having said the part in red below.

His Girl Thursday writes:

How come nobody has anything to say when that assbag and the missus make unsolicited edits to their posts. If Fay wanted her name on the post, there it should remain - address and all. Well he just stomped all over her free speech, didn't he? Hmmm... too bad we couldn't just have stomped on her instead of her rights.

oops - was that threatening??

Which is a repeat of one the DD nuts comments. Inside joke basically.

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Ok, sorry. I thought Lus's post said something about Pilchesky taking down threats. Sort ofexactly what he wrote. he never takes down the threats ... refering toPilchesky.I thought the crux of the thread was refering to the non existent threats about Gatelli and Fanucci. You do know the "threats" were made up, don't you?

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


NO I don't know that and yes that comment you mentioned was about him. However the joke was what girl said.



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


ok?

__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


sharilewis wrote:

Ok, sorry. I thought Lus's post said something about Pilchesky taking down threats. Sort ofexactly what he wrote. he never takes down the threats ... refering toPilchesky.I thought the crux of the thread was refering to the non existent threats about Gatelli and Fanucci. You do know the "threats" were made up, don't you?



Sorry Shari ... you will get used to the confusion of this place ... he never does take down the threats ... and it my just be my opinion ... but an avatar that shows someone blowing the head off of someone (I don't care if it's from a Movie) would make me feel threatened ... it is somewhat implied don't you think ... what if someone were sending you creepy pictures annonomously through the mail ... would you be upset or would you call it freedom of speech.

We all seem to think that we can say whatever we want about the families of politician and that we have a right to delve into the personal relationships of the public officials ... what we have a right to is simply this ... we have the right to make sure that they are fulfilling their obligations to their office to which they were elected ... but we don't have the right to say what we want about their children and grandchildren ... what we do not ever have the right to do is to go through the garbage of these people .. or to stalk these people ... what would ever make one think that when people are following these women (and men) around just because that they should not feel threatened by that ... the avatars that show total violence ... that is threatening ... and that is a matter of opinion ...

You don't have to agree with me as I do not agree with you.





__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: DD.com Identities
Permalink  
 


Sorry Shari ... you will get used to the confusion of this placeI'm starting to see that already... he never does take down the threatsagain, what threats?... and it my just be my opinion ... but an avatar that shows someone blowing the head off of someone (I don't care if it's from a Movie)it is from a movie, and the head blowing off is not from a gun. I guess gatelli was afraida si-fi movie charactor would make her head explode?would make me feel threatened ... it is somewhat implied don't you think No, nothing was implied until she was caught in her lie. Remember, first it was threats, when asked about the threats, there was silence. Then it was "death threats" the we were made to believe by the Times that the DA's office was notified and the police were notified. that was lie number 3. then all of a sudden it was "implied threats" a day later it was }perceived threats". She had to keep lying to cover all the other lies. She's in deep **** over her lies about Evans and Pilchesky "conspiring" to employ the threats that were lies to begin with.... what if someone were sending you creepy pictures annonomously through the mailbeen there... would you be upset or would you call it freedom of speech. that depends on if the contents of the mail were true or not. big difference.

We all seem to think that we can say whatever we want about the families of politicianthat's where I draw the line. I never post about someone's family unless they are a direct player in an issueand that we have a right to delve into the personal relationships of the public officials depends on the actions. I wouldn't want my kids principal or teachergetting caught by a child, getting laid in a school. That kind of indiscretion is fair game and calls for removal from their position... what we have a right to is simply this ... we have the right to make sure that they are fulfilling their obligations to their office to which they were electedtotally agree! I post about a failure of elected officials to fullfill their obligations... but we don't have the right to say what we want about their children and grandchildren totally agree... what we do not ever have the right to do is to go through the garbage of these peopleagree .. or to stalk these peopleagree... what would ever make one think that when people are following these women (and men) around just because that they should not feel threatened by thatwho was following who?... the avatars that show total violence ... that is threateningit absolutely is not. ... and that is a matter of opinion i respect that...

You don't have to agree with me as I do not agree with you. I agree!



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 510  >  Last»  | Page of 10  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard